Posted on 11/29/2002 7:57:37 AM PST by End The Hypocrisy
I am aware of the "revisionism" to claim that there was little link between slavery and the Civil War, however that is simply not the case. The Confederacy was organized to maintain the institution of slavery. The US government kept trying to limit the scope of slavery for the decades leading up to the war -- and the slave states were constantly reiterating their support for slavery and their anger at federal attempts to restrict it.
The Confederate Flag stood for slavery. That's history. Live with it.
I'll make this post and y'all figure out which flag. The Battle Flag has caught a lot of Hell that is not deserved.
Slavery was a legal institution in this country for over 200 years. Africans were brought here by northern slave traders to be used in northern industry, long before the antebellum South or the Confederacy ever existed. The first American colony to legalize slavery was Massachusetts in 1641, only 17 years after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. "The slave trade became very profitable to the shipping colonies and Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut and New Hampshire had many ships in the triangular trade,"
(72). "The moral argument against slavery arose early in the New England shipping colonies but it could not withstand the profits of the trade and soon died out."
(73). Thomas Jefferson condemned the slave trade in the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, but the New England slave traders lobbied to have the clause stricken. In a short eleven year period form 1755 to 1766, no fewer than 23,000 slaves landed in Massachusetts. By 1787, Rhode Island had taken first place in the slave trade to be unseated later by New York. Before long, millions of slaves would be brought to America by way of 'northern' slave ships. After all, there were no Southern slave ships involved in the triangular slave, it was simply too cruel.
William P. Cheshire, the senior editorial columnist for the Arizona Republic recently noted, the New England Yankee who brought slaves to America, "were interested in getting money, not in helping their cargo make a fresh start in the New World." He adds that northern slave ownership "isn't widely known - American textbooks tend to be printed in Boston, not Atlanta - but early New Englanders not only sold blacks to Southern planters but also kept slaves for themselves as well as enslaving the local Indian population,"
(74). Slavery did not appear in the deep South until northern settlers began to migrate South, bringing with them their slaves. It was soon discovered that while slaves were not suited to the harsh climate and working conditions of the north, they were ideal sources of cheap labor for the newly flourishing economy of the agricultural South. Of the 9.5 million slaves brought to the Western Hemisphere from 1500 - 1870, less than 6% were brought to the United States. This means that our Hispanic, British and French neighbors to the south owned over 94% of the slaves brought to the New World. In the South, less than 7% of the total population ever owned a slave. In other words, over 93% of Southerners did not own any slaves,
(75). Attempts to outlaw the slave trade in the north only increased the profits of smuggling. In 1858, only two years prior to the birth of the Confederacy, Stephen Douglas noted that over 15,000 slaves had been smuggled into New York alone, with over 85 vessels sailing from New York in 1859 to smuggle even more slaves. Perhaps it was their own guilt that drove the abolitionists of the day to point an accusing finger at the South, while closing their eyes to the slavery and the slave trade taking place in their own back yards.
For more than 200 years, northern slave traders mad enormous profits that furnished the capitol for future investments into mainstream industries. Who is more responsible for slavery in America, the Southern plantation owner who fed and clothed his slaves, or the New England "Yankee" slave trader who brought the slaves here in the first place?
From 1641, when Massachusetts first legalized slavery, until 1865, when the Confederate struggle for independence ended, slavery was a legal institution in America that lasted over 224 years. The Confederate battle flag flew for 4 of those 224 years, but the U.S. flag and its colonial predecessors flew over legalized slavery for ALL of those 224 years. It was the U.S. flag that the slave first saw, and it was the U.S. flag that flew on the mast of New England slaves ships as they brought their human cargo to this country. It is clear, that those who attack the Confederate flag as a reminder of slavery are overlooking the most guilty and hateful of all reminders of American slavery, the U.S. flag.
Bibliography: 72. The Concise Dictionary of American History, (Scribner & Sons), p.876 73. Ibid 74. The Arizona Repblic, June 11, 1995 75. Rober William Fogel and Stanley L. Engerman, Time on the Cross - The Economics of American Negro Slavery (New York: Norton, 1974), p.14 http://www.hpa.org/inforec/arg3.html
Not true.
The Confederacy fell and therefore the meaning of its flag is frozen in time. The flaws of the US, however, have largely been self-correcting. The meaning of the US and therefore its flag have evolved. It just wasn't to be that the Confederate slaveholding flag would have a chance to redeem itself. But it didn't. Live with it.
Oh, I'm sure the Democractic South would have pushed for better rights for blacks at the time.
Let's say it's true what you say, but when it ended the Democrat led South sure as heck were quick to jump on the Klan bandwagon, Jim Crow laws, and made dang sure up until the 1960's that black children could even go to school with white children.
Granted equal rights weren't going to happen over-nite, but as far up as the 1960's was unacceptable in the Democratic controlled South. Matt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.