Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IN CASE YOU FORGOT WHAT IMPEACHMENT WAS ABOUT
the Net | 12-8-02 | dfu

Posted on 12/08/2002 3:40:13 PM PST by doug from upland

Text of articles of impeachment

The articles of impeachment voted on by the House of Representatives.
   
    Article 1
    This article alleges President Clinton "willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony" before independent counsel Kenneth Starr's grand jury on Aug. 17.
   
    In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of justice, in that:
    On August 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth before a Federal grand jury of the United States. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony to the grand jury concerning one or more of the following: (1) the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee; (2) prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a Federal civil rights action brought against him; (3) prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action; and (4) his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.
    In doing this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
    Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.
   
    Article II
   
    This article alleges President Clinton "willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony" in sworn, written answers on Dec. 23, and during his videotaped testimony on Jan. 17 in the sexual-harassment suit filed by Paula Corbin Jones.
    In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has willfully corrupted and manipulated the judicial process of the United States for his personal gain and exoneration, impeding the administration of justice, in that:
    (1) On December 23, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton, in sworn answers to written questions asked as part of a Federal civil rights action brought against him, willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony in response to questions deemed relevant by a Federal judge concerning conduct and proposed conduct with subordinate employees.
    (2) On January 17, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton swore under oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth in a deposition given as part of a Federal civil rights action brought against him. Contrary to that oath, William Jefferson Clinton willfully provided perjurious, false and misleading testimony in response to questions deemed relevant by a Federal judge concerning the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate Government employee, his knowledge of that employee's involvement and participation in the civil rights action brought against him, and his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of that employee.
    In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
    Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.
   
    Article III
   
    This article alleges President Clinton "prevented, obstructed and impeded the administration of justice and has to that end engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover up and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony" related to the Paula Corbin Jones sexual-harassment suit.
    In his conduct while President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, and has to that end engaged personally, and through his subordinates and agents, in a course of conduct or scheme designed to delay, impede, cover up, and conceal the existence of evidence and testimony related to a Federal civil rights action brought against him in a duly instituted judicial proceeding.
    The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:
    (1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.
    (2) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.
    (3) On or about December 28, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.
    (4) Beginning on or about December 7, 1997, and continuing through and including January 14, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.
    (5) On January 17, 1998, at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.
    (6) On or about January 18 and January 20-21, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.
    (7) On or about January 21, 23 and 26, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.
    In all of this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
    Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.
   
    Article IV
   
    This article alleges that President Clinton "engaged in conduct that resulted in misuse and abuse of his high office" in his responses to the 81 questions posed to him by the Judiciary Committee.
    Using the powers and influence of the office of President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has engaged in conduct that resulted in misuse and abuse of his high office, impaired the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, and contravened the authority of the legislative branch and the truth-seeking purpose of a coordinate investigative proceeding in that, as President, William Jefferson Clinton, refused and failed to respond to certain written requests for admission and willfully made perjurious, false and misleading sworn statements in response to certain written requests for admission propounded to him as part of the impeachment inquiry authorized by the House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States.
    William Jefferson Clinton, in refusing and failing to respond, and in making perjurious, false and misleading statements, assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the sole power of impeachment vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives and exhibited contempt for the inquiry.
    In doing this, William Jefferson Clinton has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.
    Wherefore, William Jefferson Clinton, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.
   


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certifiable; degenerate; impeached; liar; littleboy; perjurer; pervert; psychopath; rapist; scumbag; sinkmaster; worsethancarter
The Sinkmaster tried to fix a federal civil rights lawsuit. He committed perjury. He suborned perjury. An attorney and our chief law enforcement officer tried to deny a woman he abused her day in court. He used the office for his personal benefit. That is what impeachment was about. Does anyone see "BJ in the Oval Office" anywhere in the articles? That is still what RAT supporters are claiming. We will not lay off Clinton until the truth --- including the rape of Juanita Broaddrick --- is known by everyone. He should have also been impeached for the perjury in the criminal trial of Herbie Branscum and Robert Hill as well as for taking a 900K bribe to let traitor Bernie Schwartz off the hook.
1 posted on 12/08/2002 3:40:13 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I always thought III and IV were vague and difficult to prove legally, but BJ should have been NAILED on I and II, because there was no disputing of the facts.

Then again, if he had been removed, Gore would be Pres now, with the country rallying around him post-9/11 - scary! So maybe it was better just to hold our noses for 2 years and clear the whole bunch out in 2000.
2 posted on 12/08/2002 3:46:41 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Thanks for hanging in there, doug. Yes, we can never forget or lay off him until justice is served, regardless of what Bush/Ashcroft don't do.
3 posted on 12/08/2002 3:52:40 PM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Funny you should mention that. On many occasions I sent e-mail, faxes, and postcards, and made calls to Gore's office suggesting that he invoke Section 4 of the 25th Amendment and declare Clinton unable to carry out his duties. He would have been a sitting president who acted for the good of his country and would have easily won election. Instead, he stood behind The Rapist, he denied knowledge of the rape of Juanita Broaddrick, and he now makes appearances looking like the court jester.

25TH AMENDMENT - for reference

4 posted on 12/08/2002 3:55:06 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
He was disbarred for committing perjury. It doesn't hurt to remind everone that he's also a sexual predator, though.
5 posted on 12/08/2002 3:55:39 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Only 11 days to Impeachment Anniversary bump!


Unanimous Supreme Court: "Like every other citizen who properly invokes that jurisdiction, respondent has a right to an orderly disposition of her claims. "

6 posted on 12/08/2002 3:55:45 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The worst thing he did was not even included in those Articles: Selling American military secrets and technology to our enemies in exchange for mere campaign contributions.

That whole sorry episode was a farce of Shakespearean proportions. Trent Lott played the part of Lady MacBeth.

7 posted on 12/08/2002 3:58:27 PM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: All
DEFENDING AMERICA
David H. Hackworth
17 March 98

LOOSE LIPS, SINK SHIPS..

While at the Pentagon, Monica Lewinsky traveled with Defense Secretary William Cohen, sat in on briefings where the highest secrets were discussed and routinely handled highly classified documents ­ top-secret documents, which, if they fell in the wrong hands, could put America at high risk and cost the lives of our warriors.

But no sweat. Lewinsky had all the appropriate clearances, right?

No doubt her background had been thoroughly checked out by investigators. Or perhaps she'd been given a top-secret clearance in a hurry on order of a high White House official, thus expediting her transfer from the White House firing line to safer turf in the five sided puzzle palace.

Bet on the second scenario and you've got a winner.

A Pentagon source says that Lewinsky was given an instant top-secret clearance, that "they rushed her clearances through and she didn't get the normal fine-toothed security combing."

Another Pentagon security source reports the White House is "spy heaven."

He says "Bill Clinton delegates clearance approval to White House flunkies who waive all sorts of criteria. A standard background investigation would have picked up Monica's promiscuity and devious nature in a heartbeat."

Normally, a security background investigation takes months. Investigators dig into every corner of your life. Did you cheat at marbles when you were 10? Were you a straight arrow in high school? Did you drink too much beer while at college? Were your mother and father stable and all-the-way-with-the-U.S.A.?

Yet, Lewinsky received her top-secret clearance in days. All her dirty laundry was left in the basket. Nothing came out about her college affair with a married teacher who says she "stalked" him using "emotional blackmail" to trap him into continuing their romance or her mailing him White House documents that could have national security implications or her being accused of being a "scheming truth-mangler."

Lewinsky was awarded one of the Pentagon's highest security clearances even though she was considered by White House insiders to be a flake with poor work habits.

And now the same White House gang that got her a quickie top-secret clearance is whispering she's an "unstable air head."

Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y., providing the overworked White House Spin team with fire support, said "The poor child has serious emotional problems." He went on to say that she lives in fantasyland. "And I haven't heard she plays with a full deck."

Those in power should have checked out her background and where her head was at rather than where her body had been prior to hiding her in the Pentagon to shuffle through secrets of state like they were pages in her date book.

A former CIA agent says "The Clinton administration has played fast and loose with the rules. Given their politicized approach to intelligence and security matters, it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of people at the White House besides Monica Lewinsky had not been properly vetted for security clearances."

CIA Director George Tenet recently said "The executive branch leaks like a sieve." He told a Senate committee that "there are people all over this executive branch who have violated a trust."

According to former CIA and FBI agents, there are hundreds of security political appointee timebombs inside the Beltway. Take John Huang, formerly of the Commerce Department and now inches away from the slammer. He also had a top secret clearance. During an 18 month period, Huang received 37 personal briefings from the CIA and eyeballed thousands of secret documents. Frequently after a briefing, he was quickly on the phone to Indonesian, the land of his birth. When he was reassigned to the Democratic National Committee to raise money, he set a new record: the only Commerce Department employee ever to retain his top secret clearance after departing.

With such a loose security program, it's no wonder that an Iraqi spy recently passed information from the Pentagon to a senior intelligence official in Baghdad about the planned February U.S. air attack on Iraq or that a well dressed dude popped into an office near Madeline Albright and carted off a briefcase full of secret documents.

Congress should give Sexgate a miss. The real issue should be Securitygate. Right now it's wide open and our secrets are taking a walk.

THE END

9 posted on 12/08/2002 4:01:45 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Doug, as I recall, article II was not approved... Even stalwarts like Lindsey Graham didn't vote for that perjury charge because at the time, the charge had been dismissed BECAUSE of Clinton's perjury (which was confirmed in his admissions under oath to Ken Starr's lawyers). Judge Susan Webber Wright decided to hold her decision on Clinton's perjury until after the Impreachment process -- as a result, according to the "strict interpretation" that Lindsey Graham applied, you couldn't hold Clinton accountable for that perjury before Judge Wright's court.

Clinton would later agree to an $850,000 settlement -- but Begala-Carville would say "he admitted no wrong" -- and this would lead to Judge Wright fining him for perjury and he would be disbarred.

As someone said: he may not have been the worst president ever, but he was the worst person ever to be president.

Thanks for reminding everyone about this historic anniversary.

10 posted on 12/08/2002 4:09:09 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
George Will made the comment to which you refer. I disagree with Will. He is the worst president as well as the worst person to be president.
11 posted on 12/08/2002 4:14:44 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Don't forget the after the fact summary of the cowardly Senate sellout!

Schippers Speech About Impeachment Of Clinton
http://www.ashbrook.org/sounds/ram/schippers_99-12-08_speech.ram

12 posted on 12/08/2002 4:19:55 PM PST by Wolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Heroes:

Paula Jones
Linda Tripp
Larry Nichols


13 posted on 12/08/2002 4:23:22 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Shhh......don't remind the media, they continue to think of him as their saint and saviour.
14 posted on 12/08/2002 4:41:45 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackie
Heroes:

Please don't forget Kenneth Starr - who went into this mess fully aware that the likes of Carville were going to muddy him over and over and over and over again.

15 posted on 12/08/2002 4:42:17 PM PST by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Good post.

Of course the Senate prevented anything related to money and the corruption from the Chicoms.

Any idea why Mitch McConnell didn't want to push for investiagtions and charges in that direction?

16 posted on 12/08/2002 4:57:52 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
I thought Starr was weak. No one else can come CLOSE to the three heroes I named. However, Gary Aldrich was a major star.
17 posted on 12/08/2002 5:14:38 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
Note: here is a blast from the past. Several witnesses were prepared to testify that Clinton lied under oath during the criminal trial of bankers Herbie Branscum and Robert Hill. Good job, Robert Ray.

=============================

ROBERT RAY: How About Perjury in a Criminal Trial?

Crime/Corruption News Keywords: PERJURY IN CRIMINAL TRIAL
Source: Dr. Paul Fick; transcript of Clinton testimony
Published: 12-28-99 Author: Doug from Upland
Posted on 12/28/1999 23:15:49 PST by doug from upland

In July of 1996, Bill Clinton testified on video in the criminal trial of Little Rock bankers Herbie Branscum and Robert Hill.

Here is a portion of the transcript:

Q: Did you know that Mr. Hill told him, "We're taking money down to Governor Clinton because we want to make Herby look good for the highway commissioner's job?"

A: Did I know that the mayor said that Rob said that to him? Is that --

Q: Correct. Correct.

A: No, I didn't know that.

Q: Have you -- in making appointments, have you ever authorized anyone to go out and say to anybody, if you raise such and such amount of money, I'll appoint that person?

A: Absolutely not. But that's not the question you asked me. The previous question didn't imply that anyone said that.

During the impeachment investigation, I had the opportunity to talk to the chief investigator for the House of Representatives. He was astounded at some of the information I was giving him and I was astounded that he had never heard some of it before. He was particularly interested in Clinton's testimony in the Branscum/Hill trial.

Dr. Paul Fick, author of THE DYSFUNCTIONAL PRESIDENT, has done several interviews with me for FreeRepublic. In doing research for his book, he discovered a witness and friend of Bill Clinton named Bert Dickey. Dickey really opened up to Fick and told him that he and seven other people had either purchased state commissions from Gov. Clinton for cash or helped launder the money.

I helped arrange a meeting and Fick flew to Washington D.C. to meet with the investigators. In addition, I e-mailed them a link to the complete transcript of Clinton's testimony. The investigators were shocked. They recognized that Clinton had committed perjury in a criminal trial. Fick is convinced that his information was what was referenced by David Schippers in his closing arguments before the House. Schippers talked about new evidence and the fact that there was no time to now investigate it.

In his video testimony, Clinton denied selling state commissions for cash. I know that Bert Dickey was interviewed by the FBI and that he named the other players. Why Starr would not follow up on the information remains a mystery.

In front of former trooper L.D. Brown, Clinton accepted $5,000 in cash to name someone to the police commission whom Brown deemed unqualified. Clinton's comment to Brown was, "Well, L.D., sometimes you've got to do bad things in order to do good things." Although I've not talked to Brown in several months, I am certain he would be prepared to meet with Ray and tell his story under oath.

Robert Ray is said to be an aggressive prosecutor. He has already shown some backbone by immediately answering the White House spin machine which falsely claimed he was leaking information. Now, Mr. Ray, why don't you actually do something about perjury in a criminal trial?

18 posted on 12/08/2002 5:17:53 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
A year of his party defending the indefensible is the thing that really leaves damage in so many American lives. It remains a defining characteristic for the clinton cronies that still loose elections for the DNC today.
19 posted on 12/08/2002 5:19:21 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Thanks, Doug, for this reminder. Let's us hope that history doesn't forget either.

X-42,Hillary!, Gorebatross, and Sasquatch Reno need to be in the Federal pen in orange jumpsuits.

The real crime was the Chinese military campaign cash in '96 for the military/tech secrets through Schwartz. Ken Starr, who I have no respect for, allowed this whole thing to become about X-42's sex life. When he said Vince Foster's death was a suicide, I knew justice would not be done. There was, in my opinion, a huge bi-party containment operation to make this thing blow over. And thanks to Trent "Gutless Wonder" Lott, this succeeded, much to the detriment of this country.

Maybe someday, the truth about the Rapist in Chief will resonate with Americans. Until then, we must never forget the criminal this man was, and is. Thasks for the reminder.
20 posted on 12/08/2002 7:08:48 PM PST by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
THE REAL STORY BEHIND THE 'March For Justice' by A Navy Vet, PartI

Photos from The March For Justice

The March for Justice, the Free Republic and what it means to be a Freeper

Daily Index 10/31/1998 - The March for Justice, Washington D.C.

FreeRepublic--March for Justice

My e-mail to Clinton News Network on March for Justice Coverage

The Dittomom Report on the March for Justice

Highlights of the March for Justice

Fabulous Photos of March For Justice

MARCH FOR JUSTICE ANNIVERSARY - HOW WILL YOU REMEMBER THIS INSPIRING EVENT?

proof that us FReepers succeeded with The March for Justice:^)
 

21 posted on 12/08/2002 7:16:39 PM PST by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I hear that the "Counter Clinton Library" in Little Rock is asking for citizen donations. Clinton selling favors while in office in exchange for large "contributions" to his presidential liebrary is another of his supreme corruptions. These library fundings are non-public slush fund piggy banks.

Short of tar and feathers, I vote for a $20+, pay at the "Counter".
22 posted on 12/08/2002 7:21:50 PM PST by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
Nothing subs for doin' the right thing. The right thing would have had the murdering rapist out of office and behind bars. Yes, perhaps Algor Mortis would be Prez now -- but that is only a what if.

Every Senator voted to cover-up Clinton's crimes and misdemeanors by holding and setting a mockry of a precedent of a sham "trial". Even the Chief Justice played along -- he could have walked out and marked us all a good mark in History's Ledger.

Thanks G-d the articles got voted through the House, and have left us smaller but permanent mark on the record. Otherwise we'd be headless or butts up pates towards Mecca in the near what-if future had even the House failed it's duty.

23 posted on 12/08/2002 7:23:20 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
bttt
24 posted on 12/08/2002 7:23:40 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Letter of Thank You to ex President Bill Clinton

Dear Mr. Ex-President:

I recently saw a bumper sticker that said, "Thank me, I voted for Clinton-Gore." So, I sat down and reflected on that, and I am sending my "Thank you" for what you have done, . . . specifically:

1. Thank you for introducing us to Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky (WH intern), Juanita Broaddrick (campaign worker), Dolly Kyle Browning (high school classmate), Beth Gladden Coulson (Ark. Court of Appeals judge), Sherrie Densuk (WH intern/nutcase), Robyn Dickey ("White House Director of Special Projects and Special Needs" I Kid You Not), Elizabeth Ward Gracen (Miss America - fled country), Connie Hamzy (yes, THAT "sweet, sweet Connie" of Grand Funk fame), Marilyn Jo Jenkins (Ark. friend), Shelia Lawrence (Arlingtongate widow), Sally Perdue (Miss Arkansas), Debra Schiff (campaign plane stewardess hired at White House), Shelia Swatzyna (campaign plane stewardess), Kathleen Willey (White House volunteer), Cristy Zercher (campaign plane stewardess), ect.... Did I leave anyone out?

2. Thank you for teaching my 8 year old about oral sex. I had really planned to wait until they were older to discuss it with them, but now they know more about it than I did as a senior in college.

3. Thank you for showing us that sexual harassment in the work place (especially the White House) and on the job is OK, and all you have to know is what the meaning of "is" is. It really is great to know that certain sexual acts are not sex, and one person may have sex while the other one involved does NOT have sex.

4. Thank you for reintroducing the concept of impeachment to a new generation and demonstrating that the ridiculous plot of the movie "Wag the Dog" could be plausible after all.

5. Thanks for making Jimmy Carter look competent, Gerald Ford look graceful, Richard Nixon look honest, Lyndon Johnson look truthful, and John Kennedy look moral.

6. Thank you for the 73 House and Senate witnesses who have pled the 5th Amendment and 17 witnesses who have fled the country to avoid testifying about Democratic campaign fund raising.

7. Thank you, for the 19 charges, 8 convictions, and 4 imprisonment's from the Whitewater "mess" and the 55 criminal charges and 32 criminal convictions (so far) in the other "Clinton" scandals.

8. Thanks also for reducing our military by half, "gutting" much of our foreign policy, and flying all over the world on "vacations" carefully disguised as necessary trips.

9. Thank you, also, for "finding" millions of dollars-I really didn't need it in the first place, and I can't think of a more well deserving group of recipients for my hard-earned dollars than jet fuel for all of your globe-trotting. I understand you; the family and your cronies have logged in more time aboard Air Force One than any other administration.

10. Now that you've left the White House, thanks for the 140 pardons of convicted felons and indicted felons-in-exile. We will love to have them rejoin society.

11. Thanks also for removing the White House silverware, I'm sure that Laura Bush didn't like the pattern anyway. Also, enjoy the housewarming gifts you've received from your "friends."

12. Thanks to you and your staff in the West Wing of the White House for vandalizing and destroying government property on the way out. I also appreciate removing all of that excess weight (China, silverware, linen, towels, ash trays, soap, pens, magnetic compass, flight manuals, etc.) out of Air Force 1. The weight savings means burning less fuel, thus less tax dollars spent on jet fuel, thank you!

13. Thank for letting your nick names be used by children all across America: "Billy Blowjob", "BillieBlobSlick" and many more.

14. And finally, please ensure that Hillary enjoys the $8 million dollar advance for her upcoming "tell-all" book and you, Bill, the $5 million advance for your memoirs. Who says crime doesn't pay!

Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth? What a guy!! If you agree that the American public must be made aware of these fact, pass this on. God bless America and THANK YOU (once again) for spending my taxes so wisely and frugally.

SINCERELY,

A US Citizen

25 posted on 12/08/2002 7:24:31 PM PST by jws3sticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
In terms of lasting damage to the country, I'd nominate either Woodrow Wilson or Franklin Roosevelt as worst President. It's too early to know what the true extent of the Clinton legacy is.
26 posted on 12/08/2002 11:36:06 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: altair
I chose Clinton specifically because of the sale of missile technology to China.
27 posted on 12/08/2002 11:42:34 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I'm agreed that selling missile technology to the Chinese was probably the worst thing he did, but we don't know how it's going to turn out. We still might not get into a shooting war with them. On the other hand, we know about the long term effects of the IRS, the UN and the massive socialization of the New Deal.
28 posted on 12/08/2002 11:55:38 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: altair
I take your point. But I certainly worry about China.
29 posted on 12/09/2002 7:37:11 AM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I certainly worry about China.

As do I, however, I am slightly less worried about them since the Kyoto Protocol (AKA international welfare for India and China) was declared DOA. China is a dirty filthy place (Beijing air makes Los Angeles look like a pristine paradise) and will choke themselves in their own pollution if given a chance. Enforced abortion and the genocide of female children will take its toll as well.

30 posted on 12/09/2002 5:46:40 PM PST by altair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All

Time to bring back some truth. I couldn't find anywhere that the Rapist was impeached for a BJ. I'll keep looking.


31 posted on 12/27/2006 3:55:52 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Don't forget, if not for a few sell-outs in Congress he would have been impeached. Why else did John Glen get to go back up in space?


32 posted on 12/27/2006 3:59:41 PM PST by MissEdie (Liberalscostlives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

"Clinton would later agree to an $850,000 settlement -- but Begala-Carville would say "he admitted no wrong" "

The classic Clintonian "non denial, denial"!


33 posted on 12/27/2006 4:04:40 PM PST by CarolinaGOP ("Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The Sinkmaster tried to fix a federal civil rights lawsuit. He committed perjury. He suborned perjury. An attorney and our chief law enforcement officer tried to deny a woman he abused her day in court. He used the office for his personal benefit. That is what impeachment was about. Does anyone see "BJ in the Oval Office" anywhere in the articles? That is still what RAT supporters are claiming. We will not lay off Clinton until the truth --- including the rape of Juanita Broaddrick --- is known by everyone. He should have also been impeached for the perjury in the criminal trial of Herbie Branscum and Robert Hill as well as for taking a 900K bribe to let traitor Bernie Schwartz off the hook.

Thanks for posting bump...

34 posted on 12/27/2006 4:06:47 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson