Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BAD LANDS, BAD VOTES
NATIONAL REVIEW | 12-23-02 | BYRON YORK

Posted on 12/09/2002 10:01:50 PM PST by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Mia T; oldglory; Luke FReeman; gonzo; Seeking the truth; imhere; dorben; Captainpaintball; ...
Dirty Little Louisiana Secret Revealed
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home

December 9, 2002

All right, so what happened in Louisiana? Some are saying that the Democrats figured it out because they kept Clinton, Gore, Hillary, and Daschle away, and most of that's true. The Boston Globe has a story about the Louisiana race – all about how the Democrats are jazzed and unified now over this victory – and the AP credits Louisiana native Donna Brazile with getting out the vote for Landrieu, but the dirty little secret is found in Monday's New Orleans Times-Picayune.

Let me take you to Election Day. It's Saturday, about 11 o'clock in the morning, and they are panicking at Landrieu headquarters. Mary Landrieu is panicking, because the vote turnout in New Orleans is nowhere to be found. There is sheer panic because if Landrieu is to have a chance, she needs a huge New Orleans turnout, which translates to a huge black turnout, and it wasn't happening. But something happened. Something changed it. Voter turnout in New Orleans that afternoon and into the early evening erupted statewide. Something caused it – and that something was a phone call from Bill Clinton to State Senator Cleo Fields.

Here's a quote from the Times-Picayune story, "About 1 p.m., Kenner native and former Al Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile set up a conference call with Landrieu; state Sen. Cleo Fields, D-Baton Rouge; and former President Bill Clinton. In blunt terms, according to a member of the Landrieu campaign, Clinton told Fields, a onetime Landrieu nemesis, to step up his get-out-the-vote machinery in African-American neighborhoods and to do it fast."

We talked about Cleo Fields last week, when I told you that Fields, who did not help Landrieu in her primary race, probably got a Bob Torricelli phone call from Bill Clinton: "Hey, Cleo, baby, how you doing? Yeah, it's Bill here. Hey, Cleo we really need you on this pal. Remember how it was with Torricelli? I don't need to tell you the name Andrew Cuomo, both of those things ought to have significant meaning to you. Now, look, Cleo, I have this thing I want you to sign that says you're going to do something for Mary but we're either going to get your signature on it, Cleo, or you're going to be found in a field somewhere. It's just that simple, man. We really need it."

It turns out that did happen, but it didn't happen until Saturday afternoon. They had Cleo Fields turn up the get out the vote apparatus – and it worked. They didn't keep Clinton out of it. Clinton was involved privately, not publicly, but had Clinton not made that threatening phone call to Cleo Fields, then who knows what would have happened. However even though it won them this race, this is not a recipe for Democrat victories. They already have the black vote. They're losing white votes and union votes. That's the bigger picture for them – as you can hear more about in the audio link below.

This is a temporary victory for Democrats, but it's not a lesson for how they continue to win in the future. This election actually illustrates their weaknesses and vulnerabilities. They're already taking the wrong signs of victory from this. They're already feeling the wrong reasons for euphoria and happiness, and the things that they're going to now use to reinforce all their euphoria and happiness are things that aren't going to help them, particularly in the south and future elections. You wait and see.

Read the Article...
(The New Orleans Times-Picayune: Clinton call turns tide to Landrieu)

http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/newsstory/senate09.html

Clinton call turns tide to Landrieu

Last-minute drive nets the support of black voters
12/09/02

By Bill Walsh and Bruce Alpert
Staff writers/The Times-Picayune

The mood inside Sen. Mary Landrieu's re-election campaign headquarters was glum by midafternoon Saturday. Checks of key precincts showed turnout among African-American voters wasn't nearly what the Democratic incumbent needed.

The monthlong national Republican blitz for challenger Suzanne Haik Terrell appeared to be working.

Then the Landrieu team made two critical on-the-fly tactical decisions. About 1 p.m., Kenner native and former Al Gore campaign manager Donna Brazile set up a conference call with Landrieu; state Sen. Cleo Fields, D-Baton Rouge; and former President Bill Clinton. In blunt terms, according to a member of the Landrieu campaign, Clinton told Fields, a onetime Landrieu nemesis, to step up his get-out-the-vote machinery in African-American neighborhoods and to do it fast.

About 4 p.m., the campaign also shifted the focus of its turnout efforts to eastern New Orleans and Gentilly, aides said. Landrieu raced to the area to canvass the heavily African-American precincts with New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin; U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans; and a platoon of volunteers. They worked the streets until the polls closed at 8 p.m.

Black turnout propels win

In a race she won by 39,814 votes statewide, Landrieu carried Orleans Parish by a 4-to-1 margin with an stronger showing than she made in the Nov. 5 primary. Turnout among African-American voters was one of the major keys.

"Statewide, we turned the tide after 4:15 p.m.," Brazile said. "That's when it turned to our favor."

Conventional wisdom held that Landrieu's campaign was vulnerable in what looked to be a low-turnout election, but she won with a slightly smaller turnout than in the primary by incrementally improving her showing in major population centers across the state.

The highly touted Republican get-out-the-vote strategy, which had been so successful elsewhere with recorded phone messages from political celebrities, fell short.

The Landrieu victory, as well as the surprise win in Louisiana's GOP-heavy 5th Congressional District by Democrat Rodney Alexander, was a marked divergence from the Republican gains made in the House and Senate on Nov. 5. But Jennifer Duffy, an analyst with the Cook Political Report, said that doesn't necessarily mean the Louisiana runoff signaled a significant blow to Republicans or President Bush.

She said reports of a Bush juggernaut emerging from the Nov. 5 election were overblown and that just 35,000 votes in Missouri and Minnesota were the difference in Democrats controlling the Senate instead of the Republicans.

"Runoffs are really races that stand on their own," Duffy said. "Given that Louisiana hasn't had a Republican senator since Reconstruction, in a lot of ways the deck was stacked against them. They had the benefit of coming out of November with a lot of momentum, and that kept them in the game in the runoff."


Negative ads 'overkill'

The runoff seemed to illustrate both the potential and the limits of outside political money in state races.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee propelled Terrell, a relatively unknown lame-duck state elections commissioner, into the runoff by bankrolling a $4 million attack-ad campaign labeling Landrieu's new Capitol Hill home as a "Washington mansion" and saying she had "turned her back" on Louisiana. The surge intensified in the runoff as a parade of political stars swept into the state on Terrell's behalf, capped by the president's visit to Shreveport and New Orleans on Tuesday.

After Bush's visit Terrell moved up in the polls, and by midweek surveys showed the race was neck and neck. Rep. Chris John, D-Crowley, said that if Bush had made his campaign swing closer to the election, perhaps just 48 hours out, it might have given Terrell the edge.

But the Republican Party's assistance showed signs of diminishing returns. Terrell said she got complaints from supporters angry about the number of automated "robo calls" to their homes from special interest groups and Republican personalities, such as Iran-contra figure Oliver North, Gov. Foster and Barbara Bush, the wife of former President George Bush. Terrell said even she wasn't aware of everything done by others on her behalf.

Analysts say the negative tone of the Republican TV and radio ads, one of which featured a Clinton impersonator talking about how liberal Landrieu is, also took a toll.

"The negative ads gave her campaign the original boost," University of New Orleans political scientist and author Douglas Brinkley said. "But they overdid it. It was overkill."


'There's no excuse'

Republicans attributed Terrell's loss partly to a surprisingly poor showing by Republican House candidate Lee Fletcher in the 5th District, where 53 percent of the voters are registered Republicans. A week ago an independent poll showed Fletcher comfortably ahead of Alexander by 8 percentage points. But GOP voters failed to turn out Saturday in the high numbers that the party had hoped and undercut Terrell in an area where she was expected to be strong.

"There's no excuse for having lost the 5th District by any margin," said Chad Colby, a Republican National Committee spokesman who was in the state working for Terrell.

Landrieu strategists also think that in the 5th District, Landrieu managed to peel off some voters who had supported retiring Rep. John Cooksey, R-Monroe. Cooksey endorsed Terrell after finishing third in the primary, but he didn't have an active role in her campaign, saying he was angry about the negative campaign she ran in the primary.

Colby also attributed the Landrieu victory to her late barrage of TV ads coinciding with the president's visit. The ads said Bush had cut a secret deal with Mexico to double sugar imports. Although the White House and the U.S. Trade Representative's Office denied any deal had been inked, the ads raised questions in the state's substantial sugar industry. It was an ad that underscored Landrieu's campaign message that independence in a senator is an important attribute and her accusations that Terrell would be a "rubber stamp" for the president.


'Thank God for sugar'

According to Brinkley, the ads also reached out to an important constituent group, blue-collar workers, that had been skeptical of her candidacy in the primary, when she touted her support for Bush policies.

The Landrieu team also said the sugar campaign sweetened her appeal.

"Thank God for sugar," Brazile said. "It stalled Suzie's momentum at a critical time."

Landrieu supporters say Landrieu would likely have been swamped by the Republican wave had it not been for the efforts of her colleague, Sen. John Breaux.

Even as Republican radio ads touted his effectiveness as a senator, the popular conservative Democrat rarely left Landrieu's side during the last week of the runoff. Landrieu supporters think having Breaux stand beside her helped deflect criticism that she was a closet liberal.

The Landrieu campaign showed signs of desperation toward the end. Strapped for cash, the campaign stopped taking daily tracking polls. Instead workers relied on leaks from the Republicans to figure out where Landrieu stood in public opinion.

Despite good weather, voter turnout Saturday was marginally lower, at 44.4 percent, than during the rainy primary election, when 45.2 percent of the state's 2.8 million voters went to the polls. Parish-by-parish returns show Landrieu won by incrementally improving her performance in heavily African-American areas across the state. In majority-black Orleans Parish, her home base, she got 11.5 percent more votes than she got in the primary. In East Baton Rouge Parish, the base of Fields' political operation, she surged by 14 percent.

But Landrieu also improved in some areas where Republicans had hoped to contain her vote. Although she lost Jefferson Parish, where she enjoyed the support of Republican Parish President Tim Coulon, Landrieu picked up 7,878 votes in the past four weeks, a boost of 16.3 percent.


Terrell for governor?

The Terrell campaign was not without its benefits. A supporter interrupted Terrell's concession speech at Le Meridien Hotel on Saturday night with a shout of "Suzie for governor!" -- an outburst that drew the loudest applause of the night.

Terrell declined to speculate on her political future but also wouldn't rule out a run next year, when Gov. Foster, a Republican, is barred by term limits from seeking re-election. If nothing else, her Senate campaign gave her broad name recognition and the heightened stature of having been vigorously supported by a popular Republican president.

"I have to figure out which way the wind takes us," Terrell said. "In my experience the people of Louisiana put you where you need to go."

Among other things, the Landrieu victory may have helped ease the long-standing animosity between her and Fields. He criticized her in the primary for what he said was her embrace of Bush and for taking African-American voters for granted.

But on the morning after the election, he said he was heartened in the runoff by her willingness to fight a popular president when she believes his policies aren't in the best interests of the state. The change of heart paid off for Landrieu. His decision to shift his African-American turnout apparatus into high gear on election day helped put her over the top.

"All that talk about support for the president turned my stomach," Fields said. "To her credit, she changed all that in the runoff and worked hard to distinguish herself from the Republicans and really reached out to African-American voters. If she keeps up that attitude, only God knows what she can do."

. . . . . . .

Bill Walsh can be reached at bill.walsh@newhouse.com or (202) 383-7817. Bruce Alpert can be reached at bruce.alpert@newhouse.com or (202) 383-7861.

12/09/02© The Times-Picayune. Used with permission.

Listen to Rush...
(…read and analyze the Times-Picayune coverage of the Clinton call to Fields)
(…take a caller who says black folks need Democrats to find the polls)
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120902/content/truth_detector.guest.html



21 posted on 12/10/2002 6:29:45 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

 

NOTE: This FLASH movie was supposed to be farce.
As the clintons never fail to demonstrate,
a farce of a greater farce just doesn't parse.
(Remember Hollywood's "Wag the Dog," which paled next to the real life, realtime version?)
 
Another example:
Designs on designs...
Although a reliable source had previously warned me about the wife's designs on the people's designs -- she had apparently acquired the nasty habit of pilfering from the White House drapery fund -- when I created the following metaphoric musing a year before the clintons "moved," I never imagined that she would -- that they would -- in real life -- in real time -- actually swipe the sofa.
 
Smaller objects neatly tuck-able in nuncupative deals & unnumbered Swiss accounts, without question...

BUT THE SOFA??

Jan. 1, 2000
 
hillary's "interior" design scheme
(an animated how-to)

by Mia T

copyright Mia T 2000

The White House Booty
 
 
 
Letters .. thanked Lee and Joy Ficks for their 1993 donation of a
kitchen set to the White House. Joy Ficks said she was surprised to
hear the Clintons are keeping the kitchen set as a personal gift.

White House Gifts List

 
 
 
• $19,900 two sofas, an easy chair and an ottoman from Steve Mittman,
New York.
 
• $3,650 kitchen table and four chairs from Lee Ficks, Cincinnati.
 
• $2,843 sofa from Brad Noe, High Point, N.C.
 
• $1,170 lamps from Stuart Schiller, Hialeah, Fla.
 
• $1,000 needlepoint rug from David Martinous, Little Rock.
 
Following are gifts the Clintons received in 2000 and are paying for:
 
• $9,433 china cabinet, chandelier and a copy of President Lincoln's
Cooper Union speech from Walter and Selma Kaye, New York.
 
• $7,375 two coffee tables and two chairs from Denise Rich, New York.
 
• $7,000 dining room table, server and golf club from Mr. and Mrs. Ron
Dozoretz, Washington.
 
• $6,282 two carpets from Glen Eden Carpets, Calhoun, Ga.
 
• $5,000 rug from Martin Patrick Evans, Chicago.
 
• $5,000 china from Mr. and Mrs. Bill Brandt, Winnetka, Ill.
 
• $4,994 flatware from Ghada Irani, Los Angeles.
 
• $4,992 china from Iris Cantor, New York.
 
• $4,967 flatware, Edith Wasserman, Beverly Hills, Calif.
 
• $4,967 flatware, Mr. and Mrs. Morris Pynoos, Beverly Hills, Calif.
 
• $4,787 china from Mary Steenburgen and Ted Danson, Los Angeles.
 
• $4,920 china from Mr. and Mrs. Steven Spielberg, Universal City,
Calif.
 
• $3,000 painting from Joan Tumpson, Miami.
 
• $2,993 televisions and DVD player from Paul Goldenberg, La Habra,
Calif.
 
• $2,400 dining room chairs from Arthur Athis, Los Angeles.
 
• $2,110 china and jacket from Jill and Ken Iscol, Pound Ridge, N.Y.
 
• $1,588 flatware from Myra Greenspun, Green Valley, Nev.
 
• $595 pantsuit and sweater, Margaret O'Leary, San Francisco.
 
• $524 golf driver and golf balls from Richard Helmstetter, Carlsbad,
Calif.
 
• $500 antique book on George Washington, Mr. and Mrs. Bud Yorkin, Los
Angeles.
 
• $499 golf driver from Ely Callaway, Carlsbad, Calif.
 
• $450 leather jacket from Vin Gupta, Omaha.
 
• $350 golf driver, Jack Nicholson, Beverly Hills, Calif.
 
• $350 framed tapestry, Mr. and Mrs. Vo Viet Thanh, Vietnam.
 
• $340 two sweaters from Robin Carnahan and Nina Canci, St. Louis.
 
• $300 flatware from Colette D'Etremont, New Brunswick, Canada.
 
• $300 painting of Buddy, Brian B. Ready, Chappaqua, N.Y.

 

Chair Lift
 

Among the gifts that former president Bill Clinton says he is keeping as
personal presents he accepted last year are $28,000 worth of furnishings
that documents and interviews indicate were given to the National Park
Service in 1993 as part of the permanent White House collection...
 
Two of the furniture makers whose donations Clinton took with him on
leaving the White House last month say they gave them to the White House
as part of a widely publicized, $396,000 redecoration of the executive
mansion and not to Clinton personally.
 
"When we've been asked to donate, it was always hyphenated with the
words, " 'White House,' " New York manufacturer Steve Mittman said of
his family-owned business, which gave two sofas, an easy chair and an
ottoman, worth $19,900 and listed by Clinton as part of the gifts he
took with him. "To us, it was not a donation to a particular person."

Gifts Were Not Meant for Clintons, Some Donors Say

Sen. Clinton made another assertion - one that is equally misleading.

She contends she was not obliged to report the first Leiber bag she received "because it was received before the Clintons entered the White House."

But this bag, valued at $3,500, was received after the election and during the transition and therefore obviously was related to the Clinton presidency.

HILLARY'S STORY ON HER WHITE HOUSE GIFTS IS FULL OF (LOOP)HOLES, Dick Morris

 

 
But he said the Socks purse was given to Clinton during the transition in late 1992, before her husband took office...
--HILLARY: I RETURNED GIFTS TO THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE

TRANSLATION: An earlier example of the clinton post-election/pre-swearing-in klepto-bribery scheme...

 

MORE: HILLARY: I RETURNED GIFTS TO THE NATIONAL ARCHIVE [SOCKS BAGS BAG]

22 posted on 12/10/2002 7:06:22 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123; All
Who decides if an election is invalid ?

Generally, I believe county election officials can declare individual ballots invalid, but not an entire election. Only the courts can do that.

In Florida, for example, the standard for invalidating an election was spelled out in a 1998 Florida Supreme Court decision, Beckstrom v. Volusia County Canvassing Board.

If reasonable doubt exists about whether the election result expressed the will of the people, the court ruled, the election results could be declared invalid. But the burden of proof weighs heavily on the party contesting the election.

The case laid out three measures for invalidating an election:

 

If the GOP continues to refuse to go after Democrat vote fraud, then it seems that we, the voters, can--and must--take on the problem.

 
We must start suing to overturn tainted elections. Perhaps we at FR can begin such a movement...

23 posted on 12/10/2002 7:36:22 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All

SENATORS FOR VOTE FRAUD

By ARNOLD ALHERT

October 19, 2002 -- IT'S more than a little ironic. On the same day it was announced that Saddam Hussein has been "unanimously" re-elected, the only two senators preventing a unanimous vote in the Senate on the election-reform bill were New York's own Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.

Why? "This would make it more difficult to vote in New York. It's designed to suppress minority voting participation," said Sen. Clinton.

The "this" Sen. Clinton is referring to is the new anti-fraud provisions in the bill. They require that every person wanting to vote show a driver's license, Social Security number or other approved ID in order to cast a ballot.

Clinton and Schumer preferred a system where a potential voter merely had to sign his or her name.

So who is it exactly that this bill is "suppressing"? U.S. citizens have all the requisite ID - no matter what their ethnicity. Could it be that Clinton and Schumer are "sensitive" to some of the leftist fringe groups in this country who are clamoring for the right of illegal aliens to vote?

It is no secret that New York is home to thousands of undocumented "residents" - who would vote overwhelmingly Democratic if they could just get past these darn ID requirements.

New York's dynamic duo have a lot more 'splainin' to do on this one.

E-mail: ahlert@mindspring.com

Q ERTY4 double bagel REALITY CHECK

bump!


24 posted on 12/10/2002 7:54:17 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I understand Thune not wanting to be a Gore-like whiner, but absentee voter registration fraud was known to be going on in South Dakota long before the election. While Thune and the republican lawyers on the case knew that a simple recount would not change the results, they could have put up a fight in the courts. (Especially since a former Daschle aide was in charge of Indian voter registration.) But think about it...a court fight would have been portrayed by Democrats and the media as Republicans versus Native Americans. Wouldn't the democrats have had fun with that?

Republicans didn't challenge Sanchez out of the same Cowardice x 2. Republicans versus a Hispanic Woman.
Double doo doo

It's laughable when you think of Mary Frances Berry going after imaginary voter fraud against Republicans in Florida, but our hands are tied when it comes to the real deal.

I don't think there's a thing we can do nationally to clean up dirty voting practices. It's got to be at the precinct level.

25 posted on 12/10/2002 8:15:09 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Of course, it did help to have FBI poll watchers fanned out all over the country to suspect voting places. I'm sure that will continue.....as long as President Bush and John Ashcroft are in office.
26 posted on 12/10/2002 8:17:24 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
The notions of freedom and democracy and rule of law have apparently become too quaint for post-clinton America.
27 posted on 12/10/2002 8:47:57 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Diver Dave
"Let's not forget the voter fraud when B-1 Bob Dornan was shafted by the DNC and Loretta Sanchez. Did the RNC go to bat for B-1 Bob? Not at all. As a matter of fact, they were more than happy to see a conservative hit the unemployment lines. He made too many waves. So now California and the House of Representatives is stuck with the Sister Act."

Amen to that brother!

28 posted on 12/10/2002 8:56:09 AM PST by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cinnamon Girl
When the Republican candidate doesn't even ask for a recount -- honest Americans are the losers.
29 posted on 12/10/2002 9:53:34 AM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson