Skip to comments.
Republicans look to new Senate leader to help repair Lott damage (WE MUST BE GOOD TO MINORITIES)
Associated Press ^
| 12/23/2002
| LEIGH STROPE
Posted on 12/23/2002 6:57:59 AM PST by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: M. Thatcher
You are right, and, once the bombs start to fall in late Jan.- early Feb. the big mo will swing back.
21
posted on
12/23/2002 7:33:04 AM PST
by
wtc911
To: sinkspur
You forget that the GOP immune system is on constant hair trigger alert. Those who were frightened of being labeled "racist" are now satisfied.
KISS BAN ON PB ABORTION GOODBYE THANKS TO THE PRESIDENT
22
posted on
12/23/2002 7:36:51 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
It ain't going to happen. The liberal establishment has overplayed their hand. Get ready. Things will get rolling now. Don't blink or you might miss one, as the items on the Republican agenda gets passed, one after another. It is a new day. Enjoy.
23
posted on
12/23/2002 7:37:29 AM PST
by
maxter
To: wtc911
I think not, half the country has forgotten we are at war, another quater thinks the Islamists are just fine people, another 10 percent don't give a damn one way of the other, and the last 15 per cent know we are at war, but nobody listens to that group.
Open borders, rights down the crapper, and what is the big news story Trent Lott.
I have a real reason to be optimistic, don't I.
Guess I will go support the war effort and spend a couple more bucks.
24
posted on
12/23/2002 7:42:30 AM PST
by
dts32041
To: maxter
"There are some people in Washington who have been trying to nail me for a long time," Lott said. "When you're from Mississippi and you're a conservative and you're a Christian, there are a lot of people that don't like that. I fell into their trap and so I have only myself to blame."
He wouldn't say who those political enemies were.
Trent Lott
the enemy is the gutless republicans
25
posted on
12/23/2002 7:46:16 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: sinkspur
Indeed. It is very likely Frist will let the partial birth abortion (which is really another name for infanticide) ban die in Congress.
Bush will not push it forward, that is for certain.
I imagine Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and NOW are well-pleased, as are the population planners in the UN.
26
posted on
12/23/2002 7:47:34 AM PST
by
fogarty
To: TLBSHOW
Lott had just finished hanging a swing for his granddaughter. Lott made no comment to reporters about resigning his Senate leadership post, and just wished everyone a Merry Christmas.
27
posted on
12/23/2002 7:49:04 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: fogarty
Indeed. It is very likely Frist will let the partial birth abortion (which is really another name for infanticide) ban die in Congress.
Bush will not push it forward, that is for certain.
I imagine Planned Parenthood, NARAL, and NOW are well-pleased, as are the population planners in the UN.
BUMP
it was all about pb abortion which the president now has stopped by this knife in lotts back
28
posted on
12/23/2002 7:50:15 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: fogarty
Bush will not push it forward, that is for certain. If Bush doesn't mention it in his State of the Union, you'll know it's dead.
29
posted on
12/23/2002 7:51:33 AM PST
by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
These folks can wreck the GOP in elections. Pass the PBA and all will be well. The pro-lifers will be happy and the pro-choicers will be smart enough to stay away from the issue. It's time we quit caving.
To: TLBSHOW
Lott has taken responsibility for his ill advised statements. He has done the right thing by stepping down. What you portray would definitely happen if he remained in his post. The republicans, for their part, had little choice. They have essentially made the play that will get this controversy behind them to a great extent.
31
posted on
12/23/2002 7:56:45 AM PST
by
maxter
To: maxter
Lott will remain in the Senate, but not in a leadership role. Republican sources said it appeared that Lott, a senator since 1989, had waited too long to end the controversy and lost any leverage he might have had to cut a deal to become a committee chairman.
"There is no apparent position of influence to which we can elect him," McConnell said. "He will, in my view, have enormous influence as someone who knows a lot about how the Senate works."
The Lott controversy may have a direct influence on the president's judicial picks, Hagel suggested.
One test could come soon: Bush's possible renomination of U.S. District Judge Charles Pickering for a federal appeals court seat.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=512&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20021223/ap_on_go_co/senate_leader
32
posted on
12/23/2002 7:59:14 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW
So what should we do? Be nasty to minorities?
I work with the president's urban outreach program to bring more minorities into the party. Should I go and tell them all to go screw themselves and vote for the dems so we can lose more races and become a more liberal country?
I don't judge people by the color of their skin, I judge them in how they treat others.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
of course not
34
posted on
12/23/2002 8:00:55 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
To: TLBSHOW; M. Thatcher
Pat kinda forgot about good ol' Trent's coziness with the Council of Conservative Citizens in recent times.
In case no one wants to look at their site, they still believe in racial segregation as a principle.
In other words, Trent Lott meant exactly what we thought he meant, and confirmed it during his interview on BET when he talked of race and immoral leadership.
I intend this to be my last post on this topic, so I'll leave everyone with this set of thoughts:
1. There is no objective standard by which anyone can state that government imposed segregation and the Jim Crow laws were good.
2. There is no objective standard by which ooposing the end of segregation and Jim Crow were good.
3. There is no objective standard by which anyone can say that the systematic exclusion of a race of people from the economy of their communities was good.
4. There is no objective standard by which anyone can say that opposition to full voting rights by blacks was good.
That century of apartheid that followed the Civil War left a stain on our history - and there are many people alive today who remember what that was like. It isn't remote and long past - so when blacks cringe over the type of remarks made by Lott, or by talk of states rights, it is particularly chilling.
It isn't PC pandering to feel some sense of shame over the things people in our parents and grandparents' generation did. My folks were Wallace voters in '68 - something they're not proud of now. I brought my own grandmother up short this week, when she tried to support Trent Lott based on a very little knowledge and a lot of stored up racial vitriol.
Anyway, I've said my piece on Trent Lott and race, and I'm really and truly sick of it.
Merry Christmas to all.
To: TLBSHOW
Ok, so why the " WE MUST BE GOOD TO MINORITIES" in your changed headline? That's a very racist statement.
We should be good to everyone.
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Change my "were" in #s 1 and 2 to "was".
Jim needs a grammar check sometimes for those of us who don't proof before posting, LOL.
To: TLBSHOW
38
posted on
12/23/2002 8:05:42 AM PST
by
Polybius
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: TLBSHOW
The Republicans are the stupid party. This has never been about Trent Lott. Not from day one. Rush Limbaugh is one fo the few people who gets it. The progression of the attacks were coming and we did nothing about it. With the exception of El Rushbo, no one is defending the GOP, conservatives, US history, and the whole south which are being tarred by the media because of Trent Lott.
Just take a look at the arguements. Whenever some leftist complains about Lott and we point out their deafening silence on Robert Byrd using the "n" word and other democrat transgressions. The response is always, "But this is about Trent Lott". Then they go on to falsely attach rascism by proxy to all other political enemies while we stand by and watch it happen.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson