Posted on 01/11/2003 2:31:49 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
NEW WAVERLY -- The Sam Houston National Forest will be a testing ground for a Bush administration policy to expedite timber harvesting and controlled burns in fire-prone federal forests.
About 7,500 acres of dense pine forest 60 miles north of Houston are to be thinned and burned this year after undergoing a scaled-down environmental review that advocates say masks the true impact and opens publicly owned lands to timber companies.
The woodland is one of 10 forests nationwide that will be subjected to the new policy, the Healthy Forests Initiative, which is aimed at reducing the paperwork and lawsuits that U.S. Forest Service officials say have hindered management and led to one of the worst wildfire seasons on record in the West last summer.
Besides the streamlined review, the initiative, first announced in August, expands the number of projects exempt from environmental oversight and makes it tougher for advocacy groups to file appeals.
The other test projects are in Idaho, Nevada, California, Oregon, Utah, Michigan and Washington.
Eventually, however, the policy will be applied to as much as 190 million acres of public land that is at high risk of fires and debilitating insect infestations.
"It will speed up the process. It will make it harder for the public to figure out what is going on," said Brandt Mannchen, forestry chairman for the Houston Sierra Club. "It will make it seem like everything is benign and innocuous when, in fact, over a period of time, we are converting the forest."
Forest managers and timber companies call the changes necessary to reduce fire risk.
"These common-sense reforms would reduce the overlapping studies required by current law that result in undue delay," said James Houser, president of the Texas Forestry Association, a trade group of timber and wood-product companies.
At the Sam Houston forest, management efforts will be focused on a 15,555-acre area known as Four Notch that has a long history of controversy. Here, the forest borders private homes, a church camp and the gymnastics training facility of world-famous coach Bela Karolyi.
But over the past decade, only 20 percent of the area has been thinned and slightly more than 2,000 acres burned -- actions that foresters say were delayed by Southern pine beetle infestations, weather, protests and lawsuits.
The controversy erupted in the 1980s, when a beetle outbreak destroyed 2,600 acres. When the Forest Service attempted to clear and replant the area, environmentalists chained themselves to trees and equipment in protest.
Now, forest rangers say, it is only a matter of time until the beetle, or a catastrophic fire, breaks out.
"We have areas where we feel we have to be doing more management of vegetation, and we are not moving very fast with it," said Tim Bigler, the district ranger for the Sam Houston National Forest. "The process has really slowed us down. We need to take action whenever biology is dictating something needs to be done."
And in the Four Notch area, the trees are telling foresters they need help.
Patches are so dense -- what biologists call "dog-hair stands" -- that it is difficult to walk and the canopy above blocks the light from the younger trees below.
These young, scraggly stands drive away the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker while encouraging Southern pine beetle populations to explode and fires to burn out of control, biologists say.
Still, over the past five years, only two of the 53 fires that broke out in the 162,000-acre Sam Houston National Forest were in the Four Notch area.
Under the expedited review, foresters here plan to decide on what will be thinned and burned by August, after a biological survey and 30 days of public comment. Then, depending on the degree of the impacts, the Four Notch project could require a full environmental impact statement.
Bigler says the new policy won't affect what he does.
Starting next week, he and other foresters will begin studying the area slated for thinning. They will determine how many trees are on a given acre, measure the diameter of their trunks and assess whether the area is home to any threatened or endangered species, such as the woodpecker, which could be affected by logging and burning.
Using this information, foresters will decide which trees -- and how many -- should be cut down, and seek bids from timber companies.
Environmentalists worry, however, that not all of the information gathered will be present in the pared-down environmental assessment, making it difficult to judge the environmental impacts and whether further analysis is needed.
"I'm concerned that a lot of information won't show up on the radar screen for folks," said Mannchen. "They are just zipping projects right through."
There are other organizations, like the Sierra Club, who concentrate on lobbying for public policy rather than direct action. They have formed offices all over the country and lobby the government for environmental preservation by using petitions, phone call campaigns, and affiliating themselves with political groups to gain support. And like the Sierra Club, these methods are sometimes effective, sometimes not. All organizations have their problems and are constantly trying to increase their impact.***

Stephanie saddened by the destruction of the Redwoods

Julia Butterfly Hill from the top of Luna
Rep. Doug Ose, R-Calif., chairman of a House Government Reform subcommittee on natural resources, hailed the administration action. He said it will clear up uncertainty for regulators and developers while allowing each state to adopt its own regulations.
Sen. James Jeffords, I-Vt., outgoing chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, said the administration guidelines "strike at the very heart of the Clean Water Act" at a time when 40 percent of the nation's waterways still do not meet basic clean water standards.
Housing industry representatives who have been pressing the administration for a new rule in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling voiced disappointment that the guidance letter wasn't more specific in defining the "isolated" streams and wetlands that no longer would be afforded environmental protection.
"The wetlands guidance issued today ... will only perpetuate the confusing disarray of wetlands regulations that currently exists in the field," said Gary Garczynski, president of the National Association of Home Builders.
The administration has been wrestling with the enforcement issue for weeks, and there were indications that the EPA and the White House decided to narrow the effect of the new guidelines at the last minute, in response to criticism from environmental groups.***
Why do I get a "kick" out of this picture???? Makes me laugh?
It's soooooooooooo stupid. Who does this stuff?
What are they going to go tree hunting?????
I thought camo was for hunter's.
Oh it must be the green they like in the camo.
Fools!
Are you psychic or psycho? ......Rolaids chewing MotleyGirl70
Slash and burn is the most efficient way to maintain forests.
The ashes provide nitrates and kill insects. The larger trees are not affected.
The only thing these people have in common with nature is that they go to the bathroom. HA!
We can all "rough it" but must we not all "get clean" and shower?....ooops My bad, look we are talking about, they know all about "living off the land." LOL
Be strong. Ditch her.
Total flamers!
Flame on Badgers!
You've got a good heart, Motley. But it's gotta be tough love, for liberals.
I'm not saying it's easy; I haven't spoken to Mom since she bought me a Barbra Streisand record in '96, and I'll admit, the first few Christmases were tough.
Nah... that would disturb the eco-system.
They just go in their pants and feel warm and cozy.
If they ever ventured off the road into the woods they would be dead meat.
Just as Rush listens to.
Chip Davis is a musical genuis!
College graduates from Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington. Probably other colleges have "enlightened" grads like this too.
Here's a confession. As a kid in elementary school in the midwest in the late '60's. I was told by a moronic history teacher that "the indians" cleaned up like this. Well, I had to try it since I spent most of my free time in the woods after school. The only thing I didn't know was how to identify poison ivy!
A woman I worked with spent a weekend on her back with her boy-friend at a secluded spot.
HA! I felt sorry for her. Poison ivy sucks!
Once got it on my hands when I was told to use the jack-hammer.
What happened was all the blisters popped and spread.
I KNEW you were going to say that. These premonitions make me crazy.
---
Support Your Houston FReeper Chapter!
---

Same spot, before and one year after thinning. It was one stump with 31 trees. The groundcovers came back as soon as they had light.
It's my land.
Here's an oak forest choked with weeds and dying vegetation.

Here's what it looks like when you get done (it's taken six years for the groundcovers to come back (poor soil)).

It's my land.
Here are two types of forest, both requiring completely different kinds of management technology on one 14 acre place. We also have meadows, buckeye forest, deep chapparal... Each has its own regimen, each has its own kind of weed infestations, each requiring a unique array of processes for control. Then there is revegetation. Replanting native species is complex, because the plants have ways of relating to each other without which they don't do well.
It is responsibly estimated that the Healthy Forest Initiative will cost the taxpayer a net of $100 billion dollars and not even keep up with the accrual of fuel in an already overstocked condition.
The Forest Service spends 40% of its budget on lawyers. Are they going to get laid off? Where will they go? Activist NGO payrolls?
The point is: How is the Federal government going to learn to manage all that complexity correctly with all that variation among individual parcels and with all that bureaucratic and legal overhead?
It can't. There is a better way.
Yeah, in buckets, up in the trees.
Control burning is a form of cloud seeding? That would be a study I'd be interested in reading.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.