Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
they're both illegal, Schedule I drugs. Any parent who leaves this type of drug laying around for a 6-year-old child to find is guilty of child endangerment.

Alcohol is more addictive and more deadly than the illegal Schedule I drug marijuana. If leaving the latter laying around for a 6-year-old child to find is child endangerment, then isn't leaving the former laying around for a 6-year-old child to find even greater child endangerment?

49 posted on 01/20/2003 6:23:16 AM PST by MrLeRoy ("That government is best which governs least.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: MrLeRoy
My point was that the severity of the incident was compounded by the fact that the drug was illegal. The parents were engaging in an illegal activity, thereby placing the child at greater risk (see my post #40).

Is alcohol dangerous in the hands of a 6-year-old? Of course. But so is liquid drano, a switchblade, sulphuric acid, a gun, and a whole host of legal products.

What is your hangup with alcohol, for crying out loud?

50 posted on 01/20/2003 6:52:06 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson