The Communist Heart of the Anti-War movement. Spread the word!

Right-Thinking.com ^ | January 20th, 2003 | Myself

[Green Knight]

I'm posting this, cause I need some help from fellow FReepers. Only minutes ago I clicked on the above linked blog, which showed pctures of Anti-War protests in San Francisco (With color commentary by the writer of the blog ;) ).

One thing that struck me about the protest is how, underlying it, was communism. It was at the heart of that protest. As it's in the heart of every so-called "peace protest". This guy can see it. So why can't the media? Or why WON'T the media?

Well, you and I know why, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't try to call attention to this. Personally for my part, I intend on e-mailing Fox News Channel, Rush, Hannity, and a few other folks about this. See if Fox News at least can't cover this. Fox News IS the highest rated cable news channel, so if they DO cover this then the truth about these "peace protests" will reach the ears of a lot of Americans, who'll see these activists for what they are. America hating communists.

So I'm asking my fellow FReepers to help me out, here, and e-mail Fox News, Rush, etc about this. Ask them to call attention to the Communist heart of the peace movement. The light of truth needs to be shined on this nest of vipers. Thank you.

[Brad's Gramma]

---

HELP!!! Mo1 needs help dumping her Girl Scout Cookies!!!!!!!!!
	Free Mo1 so she can sell GirlScout cookies Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[Weimdog]

Exactly what David Horowitz thought -

America Under Siege
Frontpagemagazine.com ^ | 1/20/03 | David Horowitz

America's enemies within turned out in force on Saturday in Washington DC and San Francisco under the auspicies of the Communist Workers World Party operating under its front organization, A.N.S.W.E.R. Once again the demonstrators pretended to be peace activists, who found violence abhorrent and a willing media played along with the charade. Neither the New York Times nor the Los Angeles Times nor any media I saw identified the organizers as Communists who have a long record of support for world terror and its leaders including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Kim Jong Il, Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein.

As reported by the unfiltered cameras of C-Span, the pretense, in fact, was pretty thin. One of the featured speakers  was a spokesman for the narco-terrorists in Colombia who opened his rant (all the speeches fell into this category) with, "We have to stop America's war against the people of Iraq, and the people of Palestine, Colombia and the world." America is supporting the government of Colombia against a brutal communist guerrilla force that has been waging civil war there for half a century. Come to think of it, America's enemies in Palestine are the terrorist organizations Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the al-Aksa Martyrs terrorist brigade. And in Iraq, there is a dictator who has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of his own people and has attempted to swallow the country of Kuwait. The spokesman for the Colombian narco-terrorists was quite candid (and why not, since he knows that the American media will present him as a "peace activist" anyway). "As revolutionaries," he said to the crowd, "as progressives, we have to resist American imperialism."

Then came Imam Mussa from the mosque Masjid al-Islam,. Like most of the cast assembled by A.N.S.W.E.R. the Imam had also been a speaker at the Millions For Reparations March last August -- which was more about denouncing America as a racist, imperalist monster than making a case for compensation for any specific injustices (See my report, "Reparations Buffoons On The Washington Mall."). Here is a sample of the rhetoric at that March from Malik Zulu Shabazz (one of the few who was not at the "peace" event): "The President wants to talk about a terrorist named bin Laden. I don't want to talk about bin Laden. I want to talk about a terrorist called George Washington. I want to talk about a terrorist called Rudy Guiliani. The real terrorists have always been the United Snakes of America."

When he got going, the Imam Mussa dotted the i's and crossed any t's that the narco-terrorist spokesman had missed, telling the crowd that the regime change they wanted was in Washington not Bagdhad, and that they really didn't want a regime change at all. "We 're calling for a System change," he said. Revolution. "We won't get any justice as long as that criminal Congress is up there. We're calling for revolution. It's revolution time, brothers and sisters. We have to get rid of greedy murderers and imperialists like George Bush in the White House." The Imam then led the crowd -- are you ready for this -- in the chant the suicide bombers use as they blow up innocent men, women and children  -- Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Akhbar!"

Democratic NY City Councilman and former Black Black Panther Charles Baron was also a speaker at the Millions for Reparations March, where he announced he needed to assault a white person for his "mental health." On this occasion he kept his racism in check, but not his rhetoric. "If you're looking for the Axis of Evil," he raved, "then look inside the belly of this beast." He went on to attack America's "monopoly capitalists" (a technical term which veterans of the left will recognize as the mark of Communist and Maoist sectarians) who of course were the puppeteers pulling the President's strings. Damu Smith, head of "Black Voices for Peace," returned to Baron's theme and made it specific. “Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld," he said, "that’s the Axis of Evil.”

Larry Holmes "co-founder" of the sponsoring organization who also hosted the Millions for Reparations March, then led the crowd in chants to free two convicted murderers, Mumia Abu Jamal and Jamin al Alamin (H. Rap Brown). This was a set-piece also during the Millions for Reparations March.

It would be reassuring if one could report that a single speaker or face in the televised crowd dissented from the stew of anti-American, anti-white, anti-Jew hatred or the violent incitements, but not one did. The crowd relished the show and was in total sympathy with the message. 

Another striking fact about this march in support of global terrorism was the presence of prominent Democrat officials on the platform. In San Francisco, the most powerful Democrat legislator in the state John Burton screamed, "the President is full of shit" and that the President was "fucking with us," while encouraging the general sentiment that America rather than Iraq was the outlaw state. In Washington, Democratic hopeful Al Sharpton attended and DC ex-congresswoman Cynthia McKinney read a speech with the following claim: "In no other country on the planet do so many people have so little as they do in this country." This from a person who notoriously commandeered a taxpayer-funded limousine to take her from her townhouse one block to her congressional offices every morning.

More disturbing by far was the presence of two of the most powerful Democrats in Congress, the potential head of the Ways and Means Committee, Charles Rangel and the potential head of the Judiciary Committee John Conyers, who is of course the author of the Reparations Bill and the icon of the Communist organizers of both marches. Rangel's appearance was especially troubling because he has been a nightly face on TV news shows presenting himself as a patriot and a veteran (he served fifty years ago in Korea) who wanted a military draft so that all America would be invovled in the nation's defense. His critics thought he had other agendas, like using conscription to sabotage the war effort. Apparently his critics were correct.

Americans who care about their country and its future should think about the following. This anti-American pro-terrorist movement is now larger than the anti-Vietnam pro-Communist "peace" movement was until the very end of the Sixties. Yet there is no draft. Before the draft the anti-Vietnam movement was very very small. Its demonstrations were numbered in the hundreds of participants, not even the thousands. The first big manifestation of the anti-American left was the Stop the Draft March in Oakland in 1965, which was four years after America's involvement in Vietnam got serious.

The second thing Americans should think about is the fact that this anti-American support movement for America's enemies has deep roots in the Democratic Party. I am a firm believer in the two-party system. I find it extremely worrying, therefore, that one party can no longer be trusted with the nation's security. This problem will not be easily fixed. But it won't be fixed at all unless attention is drawn to it, and we cannot do that unless we stop the charade of calling this a "peace" movement and recognize instead that it is anti-American movement to divide this country in the face of its enemies and give aid and comfort to those who would destroy us.

---

David Horowitz is the author of numerous books including an autobiography, Radical Son, which has been described as “the first great autobiography of his generation,” and which chronicles his odyssey from radical activism to the current positions he holds. Among his other books are The Politics of Bad Faith and The Art of Political War. The Art of Political War was described by White House political strategist Karl Rove as “the perfect guide to winning on the political battlefield.” Horowitz’s latest book, Uncivil Wars, was published in January this year, and chronicles his crusade against intolerance and racial McCarthyism on college campuses last spring. Click here to read more about David

[Kerberos]

"Another one of the organizers who took the microphone, a woman, spoke of how nobody could trust the UN,"

Ok, I can agree with that.

[Let's Roll]

Rush covered this in detail today. Read off a list of peace movement sponsors - almost all are known Communist fronts. It's featured on his website tonight.

[DrDeb]

I just posted the following comments on the DOSE:

We must protest the media's refusal to ACCURATELY identify the sponsorship of and participants in the ANTI-AMERICA demonstrations this past weekend!

SAMPLE E-MAIL ON THIS TOPIC:

Mr. Brokaw:

Why do you refuse to identify the anti-America (aka, anti-war) protesters for who and what they are? Why do you force viewers like me to search the blogosphere for the TRUTH?!

Give me FACTS not DNC talking points!!

Deb Clark, PhD

America Under Siege
By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | January 20, 2003

America's enemies within turned out in force on Saturday in Washington DC and San Francisco under the auspicies of the Communist Workers World Party operating under its front organization, A.N.S.W.E.R. Once again the demonstrators pretended to be peace activists, who found violence abhorrent and a willing media played along with the charade. Neither the New York Times nor the Los Angeles Times nor any media I saw identified the organizers as Communists who have a long record of support for world terror and its leaders including the Ayatollah Khomeini, Kim Jong Il, Slobodan Milosevic and Saddam Hussein.

As reported by the unfiltered cameras of C-Span, the pretense, in fact, was pretty thin. One of the featured speakers was a spokesman for the narco-terrorists in Colombia who opened his rant (all the speeches fell into this category) with, "We have to stop America's war against the people of Iraq, and the people of Palestine, Colombia and the world." America is supporting the government of Colombia against a brutal communist guerrilla force that has been waging civil war there for half a century. Come to think of it, America's enemies in Palestine are the terrorist organizations Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the al-Aksa Martyrs terrorist brigade. And in Iraq, there is a dictator who has slaughtered hundreds of thousands of his own people and has attempted to swallow the country of Kuwait. The spokesman for the Colombian narco-terrorists was quite candid (and why not, since he knows that the American media will present him as a "peace activist" anyway). "As revolutionaries," he said to the crowd, "as progressives, we have to resist American imperialism."

Then came Imam Mussa from the mosque Masjid al-Islam,. Like most of the cast assembled by A.N.S.W.E.R. the Imam had also been a speaker at the Millions For Reparations March last August -- which was more about denouncing America as a racist, imperalist monster than making a case for compensation for any specific injustices (See my report, "Reparations Buffoons On The Washington Mall."). Here is a sample of the rhetoric at that March from Malik Zulu Shabazz (one of the few who was not at the "peace" event): "The President wants to talk about a terrorist named bin Laden. I don't want to talk about bin Laden. I want to talk about a terrorist called George Washington. I want to talk about a terrorist called Rudy Guiliani. The real terrorists have always been the United Snakes of America."

When he got going, the Imam Mussa dotted the i's and crossed any t's that the narco-terrorist spokesman had missed, telling the crowd that the regime change they wanted was in Washington not Bagdhad, and that they really didn't want a regime change at all. "We 're calling for a System change," he said. Revolution. "We won't get any justice as long as that criminal Congress is up there. We're calling for revolution. It's revolution time, brothers and sisters. We have to get rid of greedy murderers and imperialists like George Bush in the White House." The Imam then led the crowd -- are you ready for this -- in the chant the suicide bombers use as they blow up innocent men, women and children -- Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Ahkbar! Allahu Akhbar
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5620

[NOTE: I mentioned the blogosphere because I know it drives the network types absolutely CRAZY!]



SEND YOUR OWN E-MAIL TO THE FOLLOWING MEDIA OUTLETS:

ABC NEWS:
http://www.abcnews.go.com/service/Help/abcmail_news.html
[Remember to select the appropriate ABC News program]

CBS NEWS:
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/home/main100.shtml
[Scroll to the very bottom of the page and select the 'Feedback' icon]

NBC NEWS:
http://msnbc.com/news/435157.asp?066=m1#nbc
[Select the "How do I contact NBC News or MSNBCTV?" option toward the bottom of the page.]

FOX NEWS:
http://foxnews.com/foxfan/contact.html

USAToday:
http://contact.usatoday.com/feedback/print/feedback-form.asp?type=USAT+-+LT
[Choose a Category: Letter to the Editor]

[Gorilla44]

By far, this is the best blog I've seen on the subject. You must check this out:

http://www.tacitus.org/archives/000327.html#000327

I love how the blogger then goes on to wonder what the reaction would be if the KKK were the organizers of a pro-war protest. How would the left react? How would the press react?

[The Cuban]

As I was sitting at home the other day eating my cereal in front of the TV, my ears (as I was not paying attention to the TV) caught on a very telling slogan chanted by the anti-war protestors in front of the White House: "A people united will never be divided." Upon hearing this slogan, reality smacked me right in the face. This is the same slogan used by Fidel Castro and his minions in their rants againsts Yankee imperisalist agression: "Un pueblo unido jamas sera vencido." It is only then I realized that terrorism, colombian guerillas, communists, Chavez, Lula and Dodd Leahy and Daschle are all part of one huge conspiracy to destroy our civilization as we knoe it. That there have been attacks not only on our morals, and our religious institutions, along with massive terrorist attacks and economic upheaval since the reign of Clinton is no coincidence, or an unwanted effect of bad leadership on Clinton's part. WE ARE IN DEEP TROUBLE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN! Pray. Castro's promise to the Iranians that together they can bring us to our knees is coming true.

[Just mythoughts]

Yes and they all vote Democrat. Democrat Party protesting war to protect Americans.

[John Lenin]

I'm getting the same thoughts as you listening to the rhetoric coming from the left. What I am hearing is so against my beliefs I now realize these people will stop at nothing to get their agenda through. I see riots in the streets coming and will be cheering the National Guard on when they beat the crap out of these morons.

[Marauder]

You're right, Cuban; that's why these liberal worms love Castro so much. It isn't because he dovetails with what they preach: He is after all a multi-millionaire and has extorted his money literally on the backs of his people, among the most destitute in the Caribbean.
When you hear the drivel espoused by these creeps, you'd think they would hate his guts, but no, they think he's a sweetheart. When one steps back and takes a long, studied look at these liberal chumps and their behavior (forget what they say, they're lying) that's the only conclusion you can come to.
Yes, we're in deep trouble, and the only way out of it is to awaken the "sleeping giant," aka the masses. Get them to get off their collective duff on election day and make an informed vote. Failing that, who knows?
There are those who think Revolutionary War II is on the way. I hope not.

[El Gato]

two of the most powerful Democrats in Congress, the potential head of the Ways and Means Committee, Charles Rangel and the potential head of the Judiciary Committee John Conyers

Fortunately, neither of these Pinkos are going to be the head of any Congressional Committee, ranking minority member yes, but not head. :)

[EternalVigilance]

BUMP to bookmark!

Your written materials, e-mails, etc., are excellent.

Very well done.

[El Gato]

Protesting is very communistic. While protesting you, the individual, must submit to the collective good. That itself is like communism. This is why conservatives don't protest very often, and join the military instead.

Liberals protest, conservatives enlist

Not making a lot of sense here, CCC. Joining the military is the ultimate submission to the collective good. It's a matter of which collective. The one envisioned by Marx and Engles, and put into practice by the like of Lennin, Stalin, and Mao (not mention Pol Pot) or the one envisioned by Jefferson, Madison, Adams, Lee(s), Franklin, Washington, et. al. Since the military members swear an oath to support and defend not a person nor a party, but the Constitution of the United States, it's pretty clear which collective they've chosen. But in the final analysis the military is a socialistic organization. Actually a bit less so these days than in the past, say before WW-II, when the military was for the most part a completely separate society.

[lavaroise]

Gee whiz, maybe Russia and China are not our friends in the war on terror after all... in this final phase of civilization destruction...

http://www.thefinalphase.com
http://pub15.ezboard.com/fthefinalphasefrm18

Could the truth be boiling up?

[GOP_1900AD]

The truth appears to be very, very painful. It is even more painful when, like myself, one conned one's self into believing that when the wall came down, APPARENTLY in response to Reagan's statement, and, the USSR "collapsed," APPARENTLY in systemic failure, that, as Reagan's successor said, it was a "new world order." How convenient it all was. The West "won" the Cold War, peace and liberty for ever. The entire world appeared to be on the verge of embracing our Western ways, especially in the realm of commerce. However, going back over the past 12 years, one must make a note of the fact that, also very "conveniently," the seeming "vacuum" left by the "demise of Communism" (well, at least in part of the world) was magically and quickly filled, almost as if scripted, by Islamism and so called "rogue nations" many of which just happened to be, if not satellites, at least on good terms with the "former" USSR and, strangely, continued to be with Russia. And now, when the mess that slowly grew throughout the 1990s has slugged us in the face, and we now respond in kind, also very strangely, the same rabble who were aided by the "former" KGB are once again out in the streets.

The appropriate call to action would be to investigate the chains of command and funds beyond the first couple of layers. We now have implicated the WESTERN agents of Communist influence. Who truly lies behind them, and then behind that layer? Do we have the courage to follow where this leads, all the way to the Kremlin and Forbidden City if that's where an objective series of inquiries takes us?