'Eco-extremists' planning to eliminate humans

InvestigativeJournal.com. ^ | 1/23/2003 | Jim Slinsky

[E.G.C.]

BTTT!!!!!!

[farmfriend]

Eliminate humans? Can we start with the eco-nuts?

They are not human, they are apes.

[DuncanWaring]

I've never seen a map for anywhere other than the US Lower 48. I suspect those who created the maps I referenced have them, they're just not putting them online.

Even these are getting scarce.

www.archive.org is our friend.

[jpl]

Are there similar maps of Asia, Africa and Europe . . . or is the US the only target of this nonsense?

I know of no other nation in the world that is being subjected to such evil designs. American private landowners are the one and only target.

[F.J. Mitchell]

They seem to have unlimited funds and influence. These inmates definately pull the strings of those who run the asylum.

[F.J. Mitchell]

"Can we start with eco-nuts?"

If they go good with beer, their days are numbered.

[maxwell]

Well I for one can't have very much respect for their cause as long as they ain't startin' with themselves...

[aruanan]

...which if successful, will effect every citizen living in PA.

I have difficulty giving credence to people who don't know the difference between 'affect' and 'effect'.

[zip]

Buffalo are delicious and nutritious!

Buffalo calves taste like spotted owl.

[martian_22]

***Wrongo! Much of the Agenda21 was written in Santa Cruz, California.***

The UN is in New York City, New York. That doesn't mean everything they write is American.

Point is even in Santa Cruz the idea is not an American original. It comes from those who would subdue us - Same as the UN who promotes Agenda 21.

[Carry_Okie]

Here is what you wrote:

Funny how all of these bio-diversity ideas to partition and restrict the US population come from foreign(UN-American) sources.

To which I responded about how the Agenda21 document, the original, was written in Santa Cruz, in the US, BEFORE THE UN EVER ADOPTED IT. Ignoring that, you go on...

Point is even in Santa Cruz the idea is not an American original.

Yes it is. It was written in America, by American commuists. You still don't get it. The documents were LATER used by the UN.

The UN is in New York City, New York.

The headquarters building is. The IUCN (the UN's environmental arm) headquarters is in Switzerland. So? The organization is global; it has offices all over the world.

I was on the first Agenda21 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Roundtable in the nation in 1994. I was there to prevent a disaster and got rolled. I have since researched the origins of the governing document. I have since authored original published material on it. Best you learn more about what you are up against before spuoting off pretending that it is the product of foreign influence. It isn't.

The point that you choose to remain in denial about is that the nexus of Sustainable Development, global communism, is not an extranational phenomenon; it is in the UNITED STATES. It certainly isn't the extranational/European influence you were inferring in your post.

[martian_22]

Don't get your panties in a bunch about my ignoring your origin testimony - I accept that; you were there.

My point was and still is if 5 generations of Americans were trained in communism and wrote an entirely new manifesto, out of the heartland, I would still consider it an un-American(anti-American by practice) and foreign idea regardless if it came from europe or not.

Any unconstitutional idea that serves to subdue or enslave us and our posterity is un-American no matter how "American" the idea is portrayed, IMHO.

Thank you for your work.
Do I get it yet?

[Free Vulcan]

The problem is, the U.S. economy would collapse into dust long before things reached that point. There would be a fraction of the tax money collected, so none of what they want could be enforced because the U.S. govt wouldn't have the ability to oversee and maintain a rewilding of an area that size.