Skip to comments.
Hillary Is Running
www.newsmax.com ^
| 29 Jan 2003
| newsmax staff
Posted on 01/29/2003 6:49:47 AM PST by defeat_the_dem_igods
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
To: Cicero
Ciecero, she plans to run in '04. She believes that the "Daley" machine will be in place, and enough voter fraud will get her in. Also, her criminal activities may start to have legs if she waits too long. Not to mention those FBI files could become useless due to attrition, retirement, etc. of blackmailees. She must have had a cow when Lott stepped down.
To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Hillary Is RunningHmmm, with the size of her calves and ankles this seems a rather extreme impossibility.The fact of the matter is she's never physically run anywhere in her life.Her 'Socialist Sycophants' always have to wait for her to arrive.
62
posted on
01/29/2003 11:17:53 AM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug , Holier-Than-Thou Socialist.)
To: defeat_the_dem_igods
I think she probably will run in 2004 and one of the items on her platform will be bailing out the overspending States.
To: Types_with_Fist
Hillary is festering ...
64
posted on
01/29/2003 12:48:09 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
To: al_c
Look for Lieberman/Clinton in 2004.That angry b_tch could never be under a man. I don't think she'd run unless she was on top.
To: waterstraat
Hillary can see that the economy is a disaster, factory closings, tens of millions of unemployed, surpluses changed to massive federal deficits, the stock markets way down, lots of threats of war and terrorism, etc. If things dont change for the better soon, ANY!! democrat will win in 2004.
Well, especially with people like you making up things about the economy.
Assuming 150 million people are of working potential (kids and the retired don't count) 6 percent unemployment equals 9 million. Tens of millions is WAY out of line. 9 million is probably high. How big are you saying "tens of millions" is? 30 million, 40 million, 80 million? Is unemployment REALLY 50%?!?!
The stock market crashed before Bush. Yes, people will try to blame Bush and statements like yours do a good job of helping them think that way.
Geeze, we've got a bunch of whiners on FR...
To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Well, I guess being on the Defense Committee now should pump up her contributions in that sector. (The lowest, of course, with the most to gain.)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
I don't think she'd run unless she was on top. I did NOT need that mental image! YUK!!
;o)
68
posted on
01/29/2003 1:16:10 PM PST
by
al_c
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Not only is unemployment under-reported, but there are also millions of additional people who are "under-employed", who are now working at a much lower level lower paid job after being layed off, after their factory closed, after they were replaced by indians or mexicans, or because they cannot find anything, whether a recent college grad, or an experienced professional computer or engineer.
I dont need to make up how bad things are now, how much the markets have tanked, how many cant find good jobs, how many factories have closed, or how much worse the economy is now.
Bush will be blamed, regardless of when it started. Bush can be blamed for the loss of american jobs, he has not addressed the legal and the illegal immigration problem at all, he has not proposed anything to get business to re-open or build new factories, or to get businesses to employ american computer people instead of foreigners.
To: defeat_the_dem_igods
Dear Mrs. Clinton,
Thank-you for your interest in the job of President of the United States. However we regret to inform you that the majority of the American people are not ready for four more years of Clinton scandals in the White House. Please understand that there were very many highly qualified applicants for this position, and that this letter is in no way meant as a reflection on your personal abilities. However after Travelgate, the FBI Files incident, and the questions surrounding the Vince Foster investigation, and the other numerous scandals attendent to your previous occupancy of the White House, the voters simply felt that this position required a person of greater integrity. We wish you the best of luck on your future endeavors.
Sincerely,
The Electorate
70
posted on
01/29/2003 1:41:23 PM PST
by
dano1
To: al_c
I should have posted a "Do Not Read Before Dinner" disclaimer. Barf...
To: defeat_the_dem_igods
It would be great fun to see her suffer a humiliating loss.
72
posted on
01/29/2003 2:16:49 PM PST
by
Bullish
To: snopercod
Hillary is running? Monistat 7 should cure that. Oh Gawd! I was eating a sandwich when I read this.
I almost hurled.
73
posted on
01/29/2003 2:19:27 PM PST
by
Bullish
She's too smart to run for Senator from New York again, so she can't wait until 2008 to run. Being a Senator is the only thing she's got. It's 2004 for her, probably as VP candidate.
74
posted on
01/29/2003 2:27:04 PM PST
by
vollmond
To: waterstraat
Here are the numbers for you, in case you wanted them. Sorry the look so good:
The Labor Department said the number of workers drawing unemployment benefits for more than a week fell to 3.289 million from 3.345 million during the latest week for which that information is available.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson