Skip to comments.
Sorry, Mr. Franklin, “We’re All Democrats Now”
Hon. Ron Paul ^
| Jan 29 2003
| Hon. Ron Paul
Posted on 01/31/2003 1:55:30 PM PST by EBUCK
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: EBUCK
Bump
41
posted on
01/31/2003 7:35:08 PM PST
by
kcar
To: kcar
bookmarked, saved as html, and emailed to self.
To: EBUCK
homogenous = homogeneous
43
posted on
02/01/2003 5:27:34 AM PST
by
robertpaulsen
(FR needs a spell checker - actually RP needs one)
To: Carry_Okie
What would you have Lincoln do instead?
And of I meant to say Sic Semper Tyrannus.
To: EBUCK
"Unfortunately, too many people confuse the democratic elections of leaders of a republic for democracy by accepting the rule of majority opinion in all affairs. For majorities to pick leaders is one thing. It is something quite different for majorities to decide what rights are, to redistribute property, to tell people how to manage their personal lives, and to promote undeclared, unconstitutional wars. The majority is assumed to be in charge today and can do whatever it pleases. If the majority has not yet sanctioned some desired egregious action demanded by special interests, the propaganda machine goes into operation, and the pollsters relay the results back to the politicians who are seeking legitimacy in their endeavors. The rule of law and the Constitution have become irrelevant, and we live by constant polls."
Two great paragraphs!
Be Well - Be Armed - Be Safe - Molon Labe!
45
posted on
02/01/2003 1:00:48 PM PST
by
blackie
To: Princeliberty
What would you have Lincoln do instead? Outlaw importation of slaves and then buy the remaining domestic slaves from their owners for full market value. Then set them free.
46
posted on
02/01/2003 2:01:23 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
Slave importing had been illegal sense 1808
states began to leave Union before
Lincoln took office.
To: Carry_Okie
I don't think the south wanted its slaves bought
and set free.
Certainly not set free in the South.
To: Princeliberty
bttt
49
posted on
03/18/2003 12:32:00 PM PST
by
Zon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson