Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian astronomer's 'extraordinary account' of mishap
SMH ^ | Feb 2, 03 | AAP

Posted on 02/02/2003 4:48:38 AM PST by SLB

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: dyed_in_the_wool
During the last freepathon when giving a donation, a list appeared giving total donations per state. FWIW, both times I donated California freepers were at the top.
21 posted on 02/02/2003 6:04:33 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SLB
There apparently is amateur video footage taken from the vicinity of St. George, Utah, just northeast of Las Vegas, that also shows glowing debris trailing Challenger.
22 posted on 02/02/2003 6:07:27 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spandau-guard
At the time you witnessed these events, didn't the shuttle astronauts still have communication abilities? I can envision them being unaware of say, tiles falling off. But you'd think they could hear whatever was causing the bright flashes - explosions maybe. On the other hand, I suspect the noise level when traveling 12,500 mph is incredible.

Thank you for posting what you witnessed. I am sure you experienced a feeling that something was terribly wrong. This is so sad.
23 posted on 02/02/2003 6:10:53 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
Anything coming out of California, whether or not from an Australian, is suspect.

Yet another astronomer photographed what appears to be the disintigration of Columbia beginning over central California. These images were recorded with a digital, motion picture camera from his back yard in Springville, CA (southeast of Fresno in the Sierra Neveda foothills).

His images show one event the created a large plasma plume and a seperate, glowing projectile emerging from the flight path of Columbia that appeared to seperate from Columbia. Not the spectacular multiple seperations over east Texas but none the less discernable.

24 posted on 02/02/2003 6:11:18 AM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
Anything coming out of California, whether or not from an Australian, is suspect.

Please refer to the snail mail address of FreeRepublic at the bottom of this page before you bash the entire state.

(Hint: The CA doesn't stand for Canada.)

25 posted on 02/02/2003 6:15:03 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
On the other hand, I suspect the noise level when traveling 12,500 mph is incredible.

At 12,5000 mph, the shuttle was going much faster than sound travels. Any sound from an explosion behind them wouldn't catch up to them.

26 posted on 02/02/2003 6:17:57 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: thinking
Just the color of the light given off by heating the debris in the atmosphere should tell whether it is silica from the tiles or aluminum from the wing itself, or both.
27 posted on 02/02/2003 6:19:21 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bob
(Hint: The CA doesn't stand for Canada.)

But man, was I confused the first time a pilot announced we had just landed in Onterio, CA.

28 posted on 02/02/2003 6:20:26 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bob
Excellent reasoning, thanks!
29 posted on 02/02/2003 6:34:39 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
>>...The pictures, taken with a Nikon 8 camera on a tripod...<<

Never heard of a "Nikon 8" camera.

Reporter, as usual, probably got the facts wrong. Guy may have been using an 8" telescope with a Nikon camera body attached.

30 posted on 02/02/2003 6:37:18 AM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: js1138
But man, was I confused the first time a pilot announced we had just landed in Onterio, CA.

Yep, we've got ours and they've got theirs. :=)

31 posted on 02/02/2003 6:39:50 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SLB
I remember the earlier landings the first image of the shuttle coming in was using an infrared video(just showed the heated outline of the tiles below the shuttle but showed the entire surface below).

How far into the re-entry\landing process were these cameras able to pick up the heat signatures of the shuttle and is it possible some independent astronomer could have had a similar infrared telescope fixed on the shuttle at the time and perhaps could have viewed a wing separation, etc. with it?

Just a thought.
32 posted on 02/02/2003 6:39:51 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tscislaw
Never heard of a "Nikon 8" camera.

Neither has Google. There doesn't appear to be any such model.

33 posted on 02/02/2003 6:44:28 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SLB; Fred Mertz
Then you missed this thread yesterday!


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/834060/posts?page=256#256

34 posted on 02/02/2003 7:13:49 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SLB
I saw Anthony Beasley´s interview yesterday on ABC. His explanation was extremely believable. He referred to the tile loses as the “zipper effect.” Once the first tile dislodged, the rest followed like unzipping a zipper.

Another surprise I got was from one of the NASA panel members (I don’t recall which one). I hadn’t realized the object that fell off the shuttle and struck the left wing as the Columbia was lifting off was the size of a door. In my mind’s eye, it was something small and insignificant.

35 posted on 02/02/2003 7:22:52 AM PST by GatĂșn(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archangelsk
Appreciate the ping. Wish I could add something here, but I really can't. As more evidence is found and analyzed, perhaps the picture will become more defined. I think it will be several months before any conclusions are drawn and made public. Of course if I hear anything among my own circles, I'll pass it on.

Regards,
36 posted on 02/02/2003 7:48:48 AM PST by Magnum44 (remember the Challenger 7, remember the Columbia 7, and never forget 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
You're welcome and I'm stealing and modifying your tag line. :-)
37 posted on 02/02/2003 7:55:23 AM PST by Archangelsk (Remember the Apollo I 3, the Challenger 7, the Columbia 7 and above all the heroes of 911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dyed_in_the_wool
Anything coming out of California, [...], is suspect. (LOL) You should stay away from FreeRepublic then, foolish one...California is prominently structural to FR.
38 posted on 02/02/2003 9:14:18 AM PST by no-s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
It came up during the NASA news conference yesterday but was discounted by one NASA expert as being the hot plama which is normally seen trailing the shuttle on re-entry.

For some reason he was talking about Hawaii.

39 posted on 02/02/2003 9:18:39 AM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SLB
bttt
40 posted on 02/02/2003 9:35:33 AM PST by wasp69 (The time has come.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson