Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peace Activists Chained to Tanks As British Army Set for Iraq Invasion (Greenpeace again)
Islam Online ^ | Februari 04 2003

Posted on 02/04/2003 4:36:28 PM PST by knighthawk

LONDON, February 4 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - As several activists of the Green Peace organization chained themselves Tuesday, February 4, to tanks in the southern British city of Southampton, protesting the looming U.S.-led war on Iraq, the British army received orders to be on standby for a forthcoming invasion of Iraq.

The demonstrators went to a military harbor in the city and chained themselves to the tanks in a bid to impede the transit of U.K. weaponry to the Gulf, BBC news online reported.

"It is worth taking such a risk if we are to succeed in heading off war on Iraq. I stand ready to stay here to that end," said one Green Peace activist.

Over the past six days, the Green Peace's Rainbow ship blocked up the way of the British warships heading to the Gulf, however, the British police embarked on the ship and forced its captain to steer it away.

This came as senior British army officers were told to prepare for an occupation of Iraq lasting up to three years in the event of war and the ousting of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, said the BBC.

"The Army had been told to prepare for a very long presence indeed in Iraq," BBC quoted a top army brass as saying.

About 31,000 British troops have already been sent to the Gulf, including 26,000 soldiers, drawn from 1 UK Armored Division, 7 Armored Brigade - the main British army formation going to the Gulf (The Desert Rats) - 16 Air Assault Brigade, and 102 Logistics Brigade.

About 4,000 marines are being sent, from 40 and 42 Commando of 3 Commando Brigade.

The British army, in addition, plans to deploy 60 Royal Air Force fighter jets and support aircraft to the Gulf region.

Many British troops being sent to Kuwait would probably be used for peacekeeping and "rearguard" duties rather than in combat at the front lines, the BBC quoted British defense officials as saying.

And some units in 7 Armored Brigade said they have been asked to protect the Americans' rear during any invasion, and to deal with prisoners. Other units, however, would be closer to the front line.

More than 3,000 Royal Marine commandos are, meanwhile, traveling with the naval task force, which comprises about 15 ships.

It would be "more politically acceptable" for the international community to have British forces leading an occupation, Agence France-Presse (AFP) quoted Alex Ashbourne, a director of London-based defense consultants, as saying.

"Because there are quite strong anti-American tensions among some of the Arab states, it would be seen as much more acceptable for the British to lead such a force," Ashbourne argued.

"One of the things that many Arab states are very worried about is an American-led peacekeeping force after the conflict is over.

"There are great concerns that the Americans want to impose their type of democracy on Iraq," she said.

In the House of Commons on Monday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair appealed for strength in what he called the "final phase" of a 12-year showdown with Iraq over its alleged development of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

"We are entering the final phase of a 12-year history of disarmament of Iraq. Show weakness now and no one will ever believe us when we try to show strength in the future."

On Sunday, February 2, U.K. and U.S. defense officials unearthed details of their plans to topple Saddam Hussein.

They said that the invasion of Iraq will start with a devastating bombing campaign ahead of a massive ground attack by thousands of troops from Kuwait.

They have drawn up a list of targets, including Saddam's home town of Tikrit, as well as key ministries and properties owned by members of Saddam's family and senior Iraqi officials.

As part of the air campaign, these sites will be razed to the ground as well as other targets such as formations of Saddam's Republican Guard, Special Republican Guard, police and intelligence services.

Ireland to Protect U.S. Planes at Shannon Airport

The Irish government, meanwhile, approved Tuesday the deployment of soldiers at Shannon airport to protect planes carrying U.S. troops and equipment to the Gulf for a possible war on Iraq on a round-the-clock basis.

"The government has a very clear duty to ensure the law of the country is upheld. Nobody has the right to damage property and to use the threat of violence or engage in mindless vandalism," AFP quoted Irish Defense Minister Michael Smith as saying.

Anti-war protestors set up a peace camp at the airport as part of a campaign against the use of Shannon to transit and refuel U.S. military planes and civilian aircraft chartered to carry troops to the Gulf.

The Irish move follows two breaches of security in a week at the airport in Ireland's southwest that resulted in attacks by anti-war activists on the same U.S. Navy Boeing 737 transport aircraft.

Six people have been charged in connection with the attacks on the U.S. plane that suffered an estimated 500,000 euros ($542,500) worth of damage after being struck with hatchets and hammers.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: britisharmy; chained; greenpeace; iraq; southampton; tanks; targets; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I say: let's roll! Load the tanks with the chained hippy and ship 'em off to Iraq. The peacenik can act as a 'human shield'-armor in case an Iraqi shell hits the Challenger!

Greenpeace protesters board Gulf-bound ship

1 posted on 02/04/2003 4:36:28 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 02/04/2003 4:37:01 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Roll anyway, heck tanks can take out chains without a problem. Sure, the protesters scream real loud at first, and it's a bit messy; but it all washes off.
3 posted on 02/04/2003 4:38:07 PM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Hehehhehehe! You don't hear the racket they make if ya button up the hatch real tight.
4 posted on 02/04/2003 4:45:05 PM PST by EricT. (Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Pinky?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"It is worth taking such a risk if we are to succeed in heading off war on Iraq. I stand ready to stay here to that end," said one Green Peace activist.

"Mr Dent," he said.

"Hello? Yes?" said Arthur.

"Some factual information for you. Have you any idea how much damage that bulldozer would suffer if I just let it roll straight over you?"

"How much?" said Arthur.

"None at all," said Mr Prosser, and stormed nervously off . . .

—Douglas Adams, The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy


5 posted on 02/04/2003 4:46:07 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Yes, their bodies will make little difference compared with the armor in protecting the tank's occupants.

Still, you've got to give them this; they're doing what they can to help the war effort. Do you think there's any point in feeding them, or would it just be a waste?

6 posted on 02/04/2003 4:50:06 PM PST by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Two words: hood ornaments.
7 posted on 02/04/2003 4:51:33 PM PST by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I say: let's roll!

I'll second that. LET'S ROLL!

8 posted on 02/04/2003 4:52:05 PM PST by barker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Passed a tank headed east on my to work this morning!

God be with you all.
9 posted on 02/04/2003 4:52:12 PM PST by SwinneySwitch (Pass the Ban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Drag them all the way to Iraq
10 posted on 02/04/2003 4:53:07 PM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NovemberCharlie
Or mud flaps.
11 posted on 02/04/2003 4:53:18 PM PST by small voice in the wilderness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RansomOttawa
LOL!
12 posted on 02/04/2003 4:59:39 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
their bodies will make little difference compared with the armor

It's the thought that counts. And a protesters body would be great as a bumper too. If you drive your tank up against a wall the paint won't scratch too much. The problem with feeding them is that they are likely veganists. So lets feed them some grass or treebark. And that is a lot cheaper. That will teach them to protest against defence spending too!

13 posted on 02/04/2003 5:02:39 PM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Now we need to hand cuff him to 3 other tanks going in different directions and then.....
14 posted on 02/04/2003 5:09:09 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
My Brother left for Kuwait Monday Morning. He is a civilian employee of Brown and Root keeping the massive Generators in A1 working order. He will be on an American Base I told him to heep his head down and do a lot of praying.
15 posted on 02/04/2003 5:26:58 PM PST by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cksharks
He's got my prayer and respect.
16 posted on 02/04/2003 5:29:25 PM PST by Porterville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
Why do I laugh at the mental image of those tank engines turning over and the dirty hippies scrambling for the keys to the chain locks?

Does this make me a bad person?

17 posted on 02/04/2003 5:33:47 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (Grenpeace the other white meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
Thanks!
18 posted on 02/04/2003 5:37:58 PM PST by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
chained themselves to the tanks in a bid to impede the transit of U.K. weaponry to the Gulf

The extra weight won't slow the tanks noticeably, and after a few days most of it will have dissipated.

19 posted on 02/04/2003 5:42:10 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

20 posted on 02/04/2003 6:01:13 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson