Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

4 ways Columbia could have been saved. From NASA's Kennedy Space Center Home Page
NASA's Kennedy Space Center Home Page ^ | 04 February 03 | Mitchel Tighe

Posted on 02/04/2003 9:40:32 PM PST by Mitchel Tighe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2003 9:40:32 PM PST by Mitchel Tighe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
You are assuming they knew they had a problem withing the 80 seconds....... where do you have that assumption documented?
2 posted on 02/04/2003 9:43:41 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Calling the Whack-a-mole team. Calling the Whack-a-mole team. Please report.
3 posted on 02/04/2003 9:44:35 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
And they knew there was trouble when??
4 posted on 02/04/2003 9:47:46 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (The Matador! The Matador!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Mitchel Tighe signed up 2003-02-05.
5 posted on 02/04/2003 9:49:11 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (NPR free zone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
I think the Russian Progress resupply spacecraft could have been reconfigured to resupply the Columbia which would have given them enough time to get another shuttle up there for a rescue attempt. We probably would have to break a lot of safety rules to do something like that, but it wouldn't hurt to have some plans in place just in case.
6 posted on 02/04/2003 9:51:00 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
I'm not a scientist, but here's my guess. They have very clearly said, more than once, that they didn't see the piece of foam hit the orbiter when they were watching the launch, as they said, it is not unusual for ice or debris to fall off the tanks, and you can't see much when you are "looking into the plume." They didn't spot the piece of foam until the next day, when they were carefully reviewing film of the launch.

Once they were out of the earth's atmosphere, any "normal" return meant going through the atmosphere, through the heat which ultimately caused the orbiter to break apart.
7 posted on 02/04/2003 9:51:12 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Ok, don't go to NASA's URL then. just be a jerk. Thanks!
8 posted on 02/04/2003 9:53:00 PM PST by Mitchel Tighe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deport
Here's a quote:

The day after Columbia’s launch, engineers reviewed videotapes of the shuttle’s ascent and spotted what appeared to be a chunk of the foam, breaking off and hitting the shuttle.

Hmmm....wonder what his answer will be?

9 posted on 02/04/2003 9:53:16 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (The Matador! The Matador!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
just be a jerk.

Name calling right out of the gate. If you're going to post a theory here, better be prepared to defend it.

10 posted on 02/04/2003 9:54:38 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (The Matador! The Matador!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: deport
Even if it was after the 80 seconds, they still had options. Go read NASA's url. It's their's, not mine!
Thanks
11 posted on 02/04/2003 9:55:00 PM PST by Mitchel Tighe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Ok, don't go to NASA's URL then. just be a jerk. Thanks!

No one was aware there was a foam impact until the next day on reviewing films (as a standard post launch review.)

12 posted on 02/04/2003 9:55:54 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
I don't think you're going to be able to find "bad guy" here -- at least not within NASA.
13 posted on 02/04/2003 9:57:47 PM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Yo Mitch - Challenger exploded at 73 seconds.

Potential damage to Columbia wasn't discovered until over 24 hours.

All of your abort possibilities are irrelevant.

14 posted on 02/04/2003 9:57:50 PM PST by Positive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
I don't think they identified the 'minor' glitch in time to react. That's understandable.

I think they had an opportunity to investigate while the Columbia was in space, but they didn't.
15 posted on 02/04/2003 9:58:17 PM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Even if it was after the 80 seconds,

It was the next day. They were in orbit. They would have had to come back through the atmosphere to land - or do you know of some back door from space to Kennedy?

16 posted on 02/04/2003 9:58:18 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (The Matador! The Matador!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Ok, don't go to NASA's URL then. just be a jerk. Thanks!

What are you, in junior high?

17 posted on 02/04/2003 9:58:24 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
Sorry, pal. The debris wasn't noticed until a day later, when Columbia was already in orbit. Sure, if NASA had noticed the impact at the moment it occurred, there may have been some options available. But once the shuttle reached its orbit, there was absolutely NOTHING that could have been done. So, please stop pulling your hair because it's all for naught.
18 posted on 02/04/2003 9:58:35 PM PST by kwyjibo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
"IT WAS NASA!!!! NASA'S FAULT!!!!!!!!

KILL IT!!!!! KILL IT!!!"

19 posted on 02/04/2003 9:59:08 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks ('I WISH, at some point, that you would address those damned armadillos in your trousers." - JustShe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchel Tighe
WHEN DID THEY KNOW THEY HAD A PROBLEM.


20 posted on 02/04/2003 9:59:55 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson