Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel scorns 'anti-semitic little Belgium'
Guardian UK ^

Posted on 02/13/2003 9:19:38 PM PST by RCW2001

Conal Urquhart in Jerusalem Friday February 14, 2003 The Guardian

Israel accused Belgium of anti-semitism yesterday following a court decision which could lead to the prosecution of Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister. The Belgian supreme court ruled on Wednesday that Israeli military commanders could be prosecuted for complicity in the massacre of 800 Palestinians in Lebanon in 1982.

Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's foreign minister, summoned the Belgian ambassador yesterday and told him that the action of the court was equivalent to a "blood libel" against the Jewish people. He also asked the Israeli ambassador to Belgium to return for consultations.

The Israeli justice minister described Belgium as a "small and insignificant" country while one of the country's leading rabbis accused Belgium of standing by and watching, "when Jewish blood was spilt like water and ignored victims' cries".

The blood libel accused Jews in medieval Europe of murdering Christian children and using their blood to bake unleavened bread. There is no evidence that it ever happened although the rumour led to the massacres of Jews in several European cities.

Israel's attack on Belgium is the latest dispute between Israel and Europe. In January, Mr Sharon said the EU had no relevance in proposed peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. He also undermined a conference organised by the UK government on reform in the Palestinian Authority.

Mr Netanyahu told the ambassador: "Israel will not accept another blood libel against the Jewish nation.

"It's an outrageous decision and it reminds us of 'Old Europe', and all its sicknesses."

The Palestinians were massacred by a Christian militia following the retreat of the PLO's forces from Sabra and Chatilla refugee camps, outside Beirut.

Reports at the time said the Israeli army allowed the militia into the camps which they guarded while the massacre continued. The Israeli government carried out an inquiry into the massacre and Mr Sharon was forced to resign as defence minister.

The Belgian decision means that Mr Sharon could be prosecuted when he steps down as prime minister, and other commanders could be prosecuted immediately if they are extradited to Belgium.

A spokesman for the Belgian embassy in Tel Aviv said it would not comment on what was a "judicial matter".

Belgium is Israel's biggest trade partner after the United States mainly as a result of the diamond trade. In 2000 it exported £854m of goods and services to Israel and imported £2.2bn.

Meir Sheetrit, Israel's minister of justice, said Belgium was a "small and insignificant country", adding, "it is a disgrace for the legal system in that country.

"It has the clear scent of a personal hunt for Prime Minister Sharon, which originated from a deliberate Palestinian initiative.

"Legally, this is practically a world precedent, a law which allows for the prosecution of a person for alleged actions in the past. It has a clear retroactive nature to it and is, therefore, unprecedented."

The Ashkenazi chief rabbi, Yisrael Meir Lau, said he was outraged that Belgium was taking on the role of world policeman. "It is regretful that a state which remained quiet at a time when it should have been screaming out in the name of humanity, is now expressing itself with such a pretentious and hypocritical voice," he said.

Other countries, including Britain, have legislation to try foreign nationals for crimes that have been committed outside their territory.

Israel has tried a foreign national for crimes committed in the past in another country.

In 1960 Israeli agents abducted Adolf Eichmann, the Austrian chief of the Jewish office in the Gestapo and an important implementer of the Final Solution, from Argentina. The next year he was found guilty of crimes against the Jewish people and humanity and subsequently executed.

Senior Israeli sources said the minister's reaction and the decision to recall the ambassador was an overreaction.

A former director-general of the foreign ministry Alon Liel told Army Radio: "Recalling an ambassador is a very serious step. We have to remember that we are talking about a decision from a court, not from the Belgian government."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: pollard; ussliberty

1 posted on 02/13/2003 9:19:38 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
There was a report not too very long ago about the rise
of active anti-Semitism in Belgium, producing fear among the Jews there. This is not an isolated incident.
2 posted on 02/13/2003 9:31:11 PM PST by Clint Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"It's an outrageous decision and it reminds us of 'Old Europe', and all its sicknesses." - Netanyahu

I'm glad to see Bibi is hip to the new (Rummy inspired) lingo.

Belgium may very well run this ridiculous charade through their courts, but the chance of Sharon actually being punished is exactly nil. Anti-semitism rages throughout Europe, and has for many centuries. Envy kills.

3 posted on 02/13/2003 9:33:30 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Fine. Let the Belgians try to abduct Sharon and take him back to waffle land to prosecute him. Belgium has been worthless since John Moses Browning died.
4 posted on 02/13/2003 9:37:12 PM PST by EricT. (Are you pondering what I'm pondering, Pinky?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The Israeli justice minister described Belgium as a "small and insignificant" country [it is] while one of the country's leading rabbis accused Belgium of standing by and watching, "when Jewish blood was spilt like water and ignored victims' cries".

Exposing the hypocrisy of Old Europe only angers them. If there's one thing they can't stomach, it's their own reflection in the mirror.

5 posted on 02/13/2003 9:40:29 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Israel accused Belgium of anti-semitism yesterday following a court decision which could lead to the prosecution of Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister. The Belgian supreme court ruled on Wednesday that Israeli military commanders could be prosecuted for complicity in the massacre of 800 Palestinians in Lebanon in 1982.

It sais there will be a court case proceedings. It does not say Sharon was found guilty. The man is innocent untill proven guilty.

This reaction by the Israelies can be interpreted as knowledge and admission of guilt.

I can't belive how as soon as an Israeli is blamed for something they bring up the "Anti-Semitism" issue.

6 posted on 02/13/2003 9:47:04 PM PST by bobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams
There is a darkness in the heart of Europe that will never see the light.

The "evil" Jew will never be truly accepted in this petty little part of Gods green earth.

It is no accident that the French and the Germans are pissy with us : We support Israel.

7 posted on 02/13/2003 9:48:38 PM PST by zarf (2003 All Rights Preserved in a White Wine Sauce with Shallots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bobi
For any European country to stand in judgement of the State Of Israel is an affront to all Jews everywhere.

It will be a cold day in hell before any Arab is brought to account in the same forum.

Belgium can stick this one up their as*.

8 posted on 02/13/2003 9:52:18 PM PST by zarf (2003 All Rights Preserved in a White Wine Sauce with Shallots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bobi
Do you have any earthly idea what your talking about?
9 posted on 02/13/2003 10:01:36 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
If the act commited by the Christian militia was a crime, then before any Israeli is accused of complicity, shouldn't the Pope be tried first?
10 posted on 02/13/2003 10:07:39 PM PST by ConvictHitlery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
no - he doesn't. but just ignore him because booby is a provocateur.
11 posted on 02/13/2003 10:09:39 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: pgkdan
yup I do.

Sharon is not guilty of war crimes. He has nothing to worry about. I don't see what is the main fuss about.

13 posted on 02/13/2003 10:30:00 PM PST by bobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bobi
Sharon is not guilty of war crimes. He has nothing to worry about

Correct on both counts. The Belgians are merely masturbating.

14 posted on 02/13/2003 10:40:06 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Arafat, Saudi royal family and Saddam Hussein finacially backing suicide bombings of isreali civilians? No problem there.
15 posted on 02/13/2003 10:47:43 PM PST by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobi
It sais there will be a court case proceedings. It does not say Sharon was found guilty. The man is innocent untill proven guilty.

Belgium has only decided to excercise this option against Sharon. They have not done so in unquestionale cases of crimes against humanity. There is a double standard.
The reason for the double standard is open to interpretation. I see only a few possibilities:
1. Anti-Zionism, but not anti-Semitism (a very rare proposition among gentiles)
2. A geo-political move.
3. Blatant anti-Semitism.

16 posted on 02/13/2003 11:05:01 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Remind me again what is the basis of jurisdiction for this extremely odd court, which one might say is rogue court?
17 posted on 02/13/2003 11:06:14 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constructionist
Please see post 16 and explain where I am wrong.

Is there not a double standard?

18 posted on 02/13/2003 11:06:46 PM PST by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Constructionist
It is without question that Yasir Arafat is far more directly complicit in the murder of hundreds of Jews, than Sharon is in the Sabra and Chatilla case. There has never been any allegation let alone evidence that Sharon knew of or approved of any massacre. The finding of the inquiry was that he should have known that the Phalangists would take revenge for numerous Palestininian masacres of Lebenese Christians, and was neglegent in not taking measures to prevent it. On the other hand, the Palestinians under Arafat have a deliberate policy of murdering as many Jews as they possibly can, which nobody can seriously dispute. Yet Belgium does not indict Arafat or any other Palestinian leader. Somehow only Isrealis are fair game. Therin lies the "anti-Semitism". The double-standard is only the latest installation of centruries old anti-Jewish bigotry, whatever it's current political rationale.
19 posted on 02/13/2003 11:55:40 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rmlew; Constructionist; bobi
You don't have to look far for the Belgian, double standard, it's made self evident by the fact that they've never uttered a word about the 150 or so arabs who committed the massacre, nor their commander Elie Hobeika.

They're not targeting war criminals, rather Israel.

20 posted on 02/14/2003 6:09:12 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson