Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruising Sparks Debate, Salinas Residents Speak Out About Checkpoints
Salinas Californian | 2-14-03 | Kelly Nix

Posted on 02/15/2003 6:17:19 AM PST by at bay

While the Salinas Police Department says its anti-cruising crackdown is intended to protect the public, some people reject the strategy as both disruptive and unfair to young people. On Feb. 6, police announced a new campaign to eradicate cruising, the practice of vehicles repeatedly driving a street route to be seen and socialize. They say it breeds illegal activity.

Last Friday and Saturday nights, officers set up checkpoints on North Main Street and threatened to ticket any drivers who passed through twice within six hours. The department plans a similar effort this weekend....

In calls and letters to The Californian, residents and non-residents have blasted police efforts. Others have praised the enforcement.

"I'm sick of the way these kids are being treated," wrote Roger Dean of Greenfield, who said cruising by young people is an American tradition. "They are being cut off by the same people that should be finding ways for them to vent and relieve some of their energy. It's no wonder they resort to drugs, alcohol and gang life."......

John Kaza of Salinas contends the Police Department didn't follow the law when it established checkpoints Saturday night because there was no cruising congestion on North Main Street. The California Vehicle Code defines cruising as "the repetitive driving of a motor vehicle past a traffic control point in traffic which is congested at or near the traffic control point, as determined by the ranking peace officer on duty within the affected area, within a specified time period and after the vehicle operator has been given an adequate written notice that further driving past the control point will be a violation of the ordinance or resolution."

"The law is written to relieve congestion," Kaza said. "It was not written to relieve all social ills." But Assistant District Attorney Terry Spitz said the law was written with a leeway for police interpretation. Salinas police Capt. Cassie McSorley, who supervises patrol units, agreed....

Round Table Pizza received clearance from police so its delivery drivers could travel through the area without being ticketed...

Kaza said he witnessed another result of the cruising checkpoints: clogged traffic on northbound Main Street that forced a fire truck to head north against southbound traffic while responding to an emergency call. He said that potentially could endanger drivers and slow response time.....

What's next-Salinas police officials say they plan to resume anti-cruising checkpoints on North Main Street this weekend, but have not revealed specific days or times.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congestion; cruising; freedomnotfree; roablocks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
This type of enforcement, 12 or more officers stationed all evening to bogusly enforce an infraction designed to be utilized only in a time where congestion is a problem, (which there wasn't) is draconian at best. Has "Swing Kids" become "Cruising kids"?
1 posted on 02/15/2003 6:17:19 AM PST by at bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: at bay
"Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble ..."

United States Constitution, Amendment I.

2 posted on 02/15/2003 6:42:20 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Very disturbing.

The police are harrassing young drivers because their "cruising" breeds illegal activity.

Police are supposed to enforce the law, not engage in behavior modification. Their job is to arrest those engaged in illegal activity, not stretch an ordinance to criminalize a legal activity.

Heads should roll on this one.

3 posted on 02/15/2003 6:46:04 AM PST by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Last Friday and Saturday nights, officers set up checkpoints on North Main Street and threatened to ticket any drivers who passed through twice within six hours.

This is completely ridiculous. Twice in 6 hours?

In my town, the failed attempt to curb 'cruising' on Friday and Saturday nights hasn't work and has totally screwed up traffic flow because the street lights are timed so that you hit every light red. It used to take about 5 minutes to go through the center of town. Now it takes easily twice that long. There's something I've wondered about this: isn't it desirable for a kid who is 'cruising' to hit every light red? I would think so. That way, they can yell to people at the intersections and spend more time calling attention to themselves than if they were moving through the intersections at 35 MPH. This anti-cruising stuff benefits nobody and screws up traffic flow 7 days a week because the cops want to curb cruising on Friday and Saturday nights.

I don't really understand why the cops are so against cruising anyway. The kids are doing whatever they're doing in public where they can be watched. How is driving them underground going to help lessen minor crimes?

The police forces are seriously over-manned if they have the manpower to check every license plate and see if the same one comes up again in a 6 hour period. Otherwise, they're grossly neglecting their other duties, which I suspect is really the case. There's no reason to go after murders, rapes, and muggings when there's (Gulp!!!) kids driving their cars up and down the street.

I've been hearing a lot of stories about 45 year old moms and dads being ticketed for cruising because they're out picking up their spouse and kids at different locations and times and pass a police checkpoint a few times in an evening.

From what I've seen, law enforcement's attempts to curb cruising inconvenience everybody and benefit nobody. The cops need to find a different priority.

4 posted on 02/15/2003 6:50:12 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Call in Sarah Brady. Ban those cars!
5 posted on 02/15/2003 6:51:41 AM PST by Ches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Round Table Pizza received clearance from police so its delivery drivers could travel through the area without being ticketed...

Oh, that's mighty big of them.

So now the you have to seek permission from the cops to be in certain places at certain times, otherwise, you're committing a "crime". What a joke.

6 posted on 02/15/2003 6:54:28 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I've been hearing a lot of stories about 45 year old moms and dads being ticketed for cruising because they're out picking up their spouse and kids at different locations and times and pass a police checkpoint a few times in an evening.

Fund raiser!

7 posted on 02/15/2003 6:55:58 AM PST by Ches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
So now the you have to seek permission from the cops to be in certain places at certain times, otherwise, you're committing a "crime"

...but it can't happen here.

8 posted on 02/15/2003 6:59:36 AM PST by Ches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Cruising breeds illegal activity.

And how did the cops come to this brilliant conclusion? So I guess any activity that brings together kids in public places causes the little tykes to go crazy and become criminals. By this "logic" high school dances, hockey games, pizza restaurants, bowling alleys, and roller skating should be banned immediately.

9 posted on 02/15/2003 7:01:18 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
In my town, the failed attempt to curb 'cruising' on Friday and Saturday nights hasn't work...

Many years ago the town I lived in was successful.
The downtown area promptly began to decline.
Now this town has an annual cruising festival to bring people to the downtown area and generate revenue.

10 posted on 02/15/2003 7:01:31 AM PST by sistergoldenhair (Don't be a sheep. People hate sheep. They eat sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sistergoldenhair
Yep. In Salinas, CA and a lot of other cities, the cops are doing everything they can to drive kids out. I'm sure the owners of game arcades, pizza restaurants, and bowling alleys love having their customers run off by the cops who obviously don't have anything else better to do.
11 posted on 02/15/2003 7:09:08 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
And how did the cops come to this brilliant conclusion?

Easy Conclusion. They use the milk theory, that nearly 100% of drug users and cruisers start out on milk and move on to heavier stuff. Connect the dot.

12 posted on 02/15/2003 7:13:28 AM PST by Ches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Last Friday and Saturday nights, officers set up checkpoints on North Main Street and threatened to ticket any drivers who passed through twice within six hours.

Does anyone really doubt that the police state has arrived anymore?

Let me see if I understand:

I pay a hefty tax to register my car with the state when I buy it.

I pay an annual tax to "renew" my license plate.

I pay another tax to get a drivers license.

I pay gas taxes and sales taxes to maintain and build the roads.

But now if I want to drive on these roads built with MY money, I risk having to pay another tax after being harassed by police officers who are paid by my property taxes.

What would Thomas Jefferson do?

13 posted on 02/15/2003 7:16:32 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
But now if I want to drive on these roads built with MY money, I risk having to pay another tax after being harassed by police officers who are paid by my property taxes.

GRRRRRRR... and I was in a good mood when I got up this morning.

14 posted on 02/15/2003 7:23:54 AM PST by Ches
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
What would Thomas Jefferson do?

Thomas Jefferson would find a couple of useful idiots to agitate with the mayor and town council, then he would hire a friendly newspaper editor to whom he could feed stories behind the scene, all the while maintaining "plausible deniability" and leaving no fingerprints.

15 posted on 02/15/2003 7:32:58 AM PST by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
This is the Police State that the Left wanted.
16 posted on 02/15/2003 7:36:10 AM PST by JoJo Gunn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: at bay
I grew up in Salinas, and when I was old enough to drive, I was one of those cruisers. Back in the early 1960's, the cruising occurred on South Main Street, from John Street to Valley Center, where the parking lot (or the old Mel's Drive-In) was used to turn around. I must admit that congestion was so bad that on some Friday and/or Saturday nights, traffic was near gridlock condition. I remember they tried to stop it by calling it "loitering", and a measure similar to this one. The problem in Salinas, though, is there is nothing much else for yougsters to do.
The local recreation center was known for their drug dealing hoodlums -- and that was even before the "drug culture" came along.
17 posted on 02/15/2003 7:37:13 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Thomas Jefferson would find a couple of useful idiots to agitate with the mayor and town council, then he would hire a friendly newspaper editor to whom he could feed stories behind the scene, all the while maintaining "plausible deniability" and leaving no fingerprints.

Your contempt for Jefferson gets you an "A" for your history class. Excellent job, comrade. Keep up the good work, and you might get a special pass allowing you to pass through the checkpoints unmolested on weekends.

But there is a waiting list for these passes, so please be patient. Just know that the central committee appreciates your service and you WILL be rewarded.

18 posted on 02/15/2003 7:49:01 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
This is the Police State that the Left wanted.

And they've taken over the Republican Party as well.

19 posted on 02/15/2003 7:49:58 AM PST by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: at bay
Many resort towns have these sorts of laws as well. Virginia Beach, VA and Myrtle Beach, SC both have signs plastered all over their main beach drags about it, something to the effect that "passing the same point x times in y hours is prohibited."

This is nuts. I grew up in Lynchburg, VA, which used to have a fairly active cruising scene on Friday nights. Kids would shine up their low-riders or jacked-up Jeeps or Camaros or riceburners or whatever (this was in the mid-'80s when I was home from college) and go out and ride around, up and down a mile-long stretch of highway, over and over and over again, or they'd pull over in parking lots and just hang out and talk.

Why? There wasn't anything else for a teenager to do in town on Friday night! They couldn't go to bars, and the city was hellbent against opening any sort of alcohol-free supervised place they could go to hang out. When churches tried to have booze-free teen dance halls and the like, the city shut them down or wouldn't grant them the permits. The only video arcade on that stretch of highway got booted out of a shopping center after the Chinese restaurant next door pulled some strings.

If somebody wants to block their private property so cruisers can't hang out or park or turn around there, fine, it's their property. If police departments want to ticket people for true illegalities--speeding, drag racing, DUI, etc.--fine. But why make driving up and down the street a crime?

}:-)4
20 posted on 02/15/2003 7:50:48 AM PST by Moose4 (The game is over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson