Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three mystery ships are tracked over suspected 'weapons' cargo
independent.co.uk ^ | 2/19/03

Posted on 02/18/2003 4:47:00 PM PST by knak

Three giant cargo ships are being tracked by US and British intelligence on suspicion that they might be carrying Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

Each with a deadweight of 35,000 to 40,000 tonnes, the ships have been sailing around the world's oceans for the past three months while maintaining radio silence in clear violation of international maritime law, say authoritative shipping industry sources.

The vessels left port in late November, just a few days after UN weapons inspectors led by Hans Blix began their search for the alleged Iraqi arsenal on their return to the country.

Uncovering such a deadly cargo on board would give George Bush and Tony Blair the much sought-after "smoking gun" needed to justify an attack on Saddam Hussein's regime, in the face of massive public opposition to war.

The ships were chartered by a shipping agent based in Egypt and are flying under the flags of three different countries. The continued radio silence since they left port, in addition to the captains' failure to provide information on their cargoes or their destinations, is a clear breach of international maritime laws.

The vessels are thought to have spent much of their time in the deep waters of the Indian Ocean, berthing at sea when they need to collect supplies of fuel and food. They have berthed in a handful of Arab countries, including Yemen.

American and British military forces are believed to be reluctant to stop and search the vessels for fear that any intervention might result in them being scuttled. If they were carrying chemical and biological weapons, or fissile nuclear material, and they were to be sunk at sea, the environmental damage could be catastrophic.

Washington and London might also want to orchestrate any raids so that they can present the ships as "evidence" that President Saddam is engaged in "material breach" of UN resolutions. This could provide the trigger for military strikes. While security sources in London last night were unable to provide information on any surveillance operation, the movement of the three ships is the source of growing concern among maritime and intelligence experts.

A shipping industry source told The Independent: "If Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction, then a very large part of its capability could be afloat on the high seas right now. These ships have maintained radio silence for long periods and, for a considerable time, they have been steaming around in ever-decreasing circles."

The ships are thought to have set sail from a country other than Iraq to avoid running the gauntlet of Western naval vessels patrolling the Gulf. Defence experts believe that, if they are carrying weapons of mass destruction, these could have been smuggled out through Syria or Jordan.

Despite hundreds of searches by UN inspectors, no evidence has yet been found of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programmes. A succession of "dossiers" presented by Downing Street has been criticised for providing inaccurate information, with the most recent one subject to ridicule because a student's 11-year-old doctoral thesis was being passed off as current intelligence. There was a further setback for Washington and London when the accuracy of satellite photographs shown to the United Nations by Colin Powell, the Secretary of State, purporting to show Iraqi officials moving incriminating evidence from a suspected site, was questioned by Hans Blix.

Mr Blix said: "The reported movement of munitions at the site could just as easily have been a routine activity as a movement of proscribed munitions in anticipation of an imminent inspection."

Attempts to link the Iraqi regime to al-Qa'ida and other Islamist groups have also been met with scepticism. The UN says, though, that Iraq has failed to account for 1,000 tonnes of chemical agents from the war against Iran; to reveal the whereabouts of 6,500 missing chemical rockets; to produce evidence it has destroyed 8,500 litres of anthrax; and to account for 380 rocket engines smuggled into Iraq with chemicals used for missile propellants and control systems.

Intelligence reports, and some Iraqi defectors, have maintained that incriminating material and documents relating to weapons of mass destruction have been buried in remote parts of the country and have also been hidden in a variety of locations including homes of officials and scientists, as well as mosques. There have also been claims that chemical and biological products have been smuggled into Syria.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 200211; 200302; 20030219; 20031018; alnashiri; alqaeda; armssmuggling; blix; bokastar; cristi; egypt; hansblix; indianocean; interdiction; iraq; iraqiwmd; jordan; maritimesecurity; mysteryships; navy; nova; portsaid; portsecurity; radiosilence; sara; seaportsecurity; ships; syria; tonga; twillinger; warlist; wmd; wmdships; yemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2003 4:47:00 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knak
Sink 'em. Ask questions later.
2 posted on 02/18/2003 4:48:08 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Sounds like a job for the Seals - via fast attack or SF subs.
3 posted on 02/18/2003 4:50:16 PM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
This could prove interesting.

Have to see how it plays out.

4 posted on 02/18/2003 4:50:54 PM PST by evad (It IS a Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
The Independent seems to be doing its very best to commit treason.

This is the second egregious leak in two days. And the leak yesterday wasn't disinformation, because it was released by German prosecutors during a trial, not by some tip from the CIA.

Loose lips sink ships.
5 posted on 02/18/2003 4:51:05 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
flying under the flags of three different countries

France, Germany and Russia?

6 posted on 02/18/2003 4:51:12 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
I think we have submarines that could provide the necessary surprise to board these ships.
7 posted on 02/18/2003 4:51:28 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Potentially deadly WMD-laden cargo ships at sea?

No problem. Cap'n Blix will nab 'em.
8 posted on 02/18/2003 4:52:20 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
What will they do now that this is on the internet, in the Independent, and all over the place? It is no longer a secret. Their movements NOW in light of this exposure will be interesting.

Maybe they are also carrying a 'package' at North Korea's request, too. NK said they would attack Americans everywhere with weapons of mass destruction.

9 posted on 02/18/2003 4:52:26 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Heading to the store to turn in my unused Perrier for a refund; gonna' buy British scones instead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
why hasn't anyone checked them?
10 posted on 02/18/2003 4:52:31 PM PST by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Lion's Cub; Squantos; Howlin; Miss Marple; Alamo-Girl
fyi
11 posted on 02/18/2003 4:53:08 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Sounds like a James Bond 007 movie plot. Maybe Tony Blair can Play Bond and Dubya can be his American buddy, Felix Leitner.
12 posted on 02/18/2003 4:54:01 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: knak
...The vessels left port in late November....

???? what port??? this report smells bad to me.

14 posted on 02/18/2003 4:55:18 PM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
There isn't any point in revealing a smoking gun until we're fully in position to do something about it. In fact, it could be rather detrimental.
15 posted on 02/18/2003 4:55:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
France, Germany, and China/North Korea...
16 posted on 02/18/2003 4:55:38 PM PST by Darksheare (<----- I am the THIRD man on the grassy knoll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knak
Maybe they can go dock in France.

Actually this is very serious. And if they know of three ships, there may be others. I hope we are keeping all suspect ships thousands of miles from our shores.
They could have anything, that they could release close to shore, not to mention some missiles filled with chemical or biological weapons -- which we can't intercept, because the Democrats and Clinton kept National Missile Defense on the drawing board, instead of developing and deploying it.
17 posted on 02/18/2003 4:56:18 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
i'm begining to think a moderate application of fissile material to this situation would be not only appropriate, but entertaining. pictures at 11.
18 posted on 02/18/2003 4:56:42 PM PST by glock rocks (honest. i took the meds. really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: knak
American and British military forces are believed to be reluctant to stop and search the vessels for fear that any intervention might result in them being scuttled. If they were carrying chemical and biological weapons, or fissile nuclear material, and they were to be sunk at sea, the environmental damage could be catastrophic.

Ok then we watch them until after the regime change. Then we make them port in Iraq, where they will be searched.

19 posted on 02/18/2003 4:56:55 PM PST by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Sink 'em.
20 posted on 02/18/2003 4:57:06 PM PST by Redcloak (Jn th lton t Prvnt the bs of nnssrl Lngth, Vrbs nd Nnsnsl Tg Lns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson