Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats for Tort Reform
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Tuesday, March 4, 2003

Posted on 03/04/2003 6:41:46 AM PST by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:48:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Democrats in Washington have long stymied medical malpractice reform at the behest of their check-writing supporters in the plaintiffs' bar. But maybe these politicians should look at a new poll that suggests they are out of step with the views of their own party's rank-and-file.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/04/2003 6:41:46 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
The Dems are a virtual arm of the trial lawyers. I can't see them cutting their biggest campaign donors off at the knees. If y'all are looking for them to sign onto tort reform, I wouldn't hold my breath looking for Democrats to end the reckless ligitation that's harming the best system of medical care the world has ever seen.
2 posted on 03/04/2003 6:47:05 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scholar
HA!!
Check this out.

Unbelievable.
About all I can think right now?

..."beware of Greeks bearing gifts."

3 posted on 03/04/2003 6:47:40 AM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
AAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

No pictures, Please!

4 posted on 03/04/2003 6:52:36 AM PST by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
No pictures, Please!

No pictures, no peace.

5 posted on 03/04/2003 6:54:59 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
The Democrat voters seem to be in favor of tort reform, but not the majority of Democrat politicians.

But note this: in the state that has so many other economic woes, California, the cap on non-medical damages has been set at $250,000, and the malpractice insurance costs have been largely contained. The Democrats in California have benefitted indirectly, both as voters and as the party that controls very nearly everything at a state level. The tort lawyers, if they just went low-key, could probably overcome the objections raised by the voters that turned to Republicans for tort reform, and they would then (possibly) migrate back to the Democrats, as they have in California. Medical care in California is probably one of the better bargains available in that state, partly because of the lowered premiums on medical malpractice insurance, attributable directly to the cap on non-medical damages, and also the number of cases which are adjudicated out-of-court by arbitration, that never come before a jury.

This probably is what resuscitated the otherwise moribund Democrats in that state, in an election that common sense and the conventional wisdom said, they should have lost.

6 posted on 03/04/2003 7:00:35 AM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Once in a long while DiFi does something right. That cap they have in CA was vital in getting their medical costs in line (now if they could only stop giving away free health care to illegals they coudl avoid breaking the state budget). However, I expect the full force of trial lawyers to come down on DiFi and she will fold.
7 posted on 03/04/2003 9:02:21 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson