Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beware of 'suicide prisoners', troops told
The Times ^ | March 17, 2003 | Chris Ayres

Posted on 03/16/2003 3:39:38 PM PST by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
This could be the biggest problem in the war.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 03/16/2003 3:39:39 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis; meema; headsonpikes; TEXOKIE; Pan_Yans Wife; mumbo; Siouxz; ...
Bump!
2 posted on 03/16/2003 3:39:55 PM PST by MadIvan (Learn the power of the Dark Side, www.thedarkside.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Put all prisoners under the control of the Iraqi Opposition and the Kurds.
3 posted on 03/16/2003 3:42:46 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Seems simple enough to me. You halt the prisoners at a safe distance and tell them to strip! I mean take it ALL off! Then, if you find they have explosives you give them a choice of removing same at a safe distance or being shot!
4 posted on 03/16/2003 3:46:11 PM PST by teletech (Can we bomb Saddam, NOW!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I don't understand why they don't make prisoners strip at a distance. Those that are clean can be marked, and we don't have to worry about them anymore.

This was a problem in Afghanistan, too--remember how the uprising at the prison started? Hopefully, we have worked out some procedures that minimize the risk.

5 posted on 03/16/2003 3:51:06 PM PST by Defiant (Human Shield Posted in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant; teletech
make prisoners strip at a distance.

Horrible mental image. Yuk! What will we give them to wear? Do we have 2,234,541 orange suits available?

6 posted on 03/16/2003 3:59:30 PM PST by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
They would get back in their clothes once it had been checked and all military hardware removed. We could let them keep their stained underwear.
7 posted on 03/16/2003 4:03:44 PM PST by Defiant (Human Shield Posted in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Seems simple enough to me. You halt the prisoners at a safe distance and tell them to strip! I mean take it ALL off!

Probably just to their briefs. We have womenfolk among our soldiers. They can't hide too much in their briefs.
8 posted on 03/16/2003 4:11:29 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Probably just to their briefs. We have womenfolk among our soldiers. They can't hide too much in their briefs.

Would you rather our women soldiers see something they have all probably seen before or be sent home in body bags because we got careless? I say the former.

9 posted on 03/16/2003 4:20:54 PM PST by teletech (Can we bomb Saddam, NOW!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: teletech
My first solution too.

Prairie
10 posted on 03/16/2003 4:24:34 PM PST by prairiebreeze (I'm wearing my full FReeper uniform 24/7 these days, and remain alert and ready with shields up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Another possibility that I hope we have thought of is that Sadaam infects "soldiers" with some contagious disease and then lets them surrender. Fortunately, I believe the troops are well innoculated for what is expected to be possible.
11 posted on 03/16/2003 4:26:19 PM PST by TimPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Absolutely make them strip at a distance! Safety first!
12 posted on 03/16/2003 4:29:20 PM PST by Judith Anne (What's another word for Thesaurus? -S.Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Would you rather our women soldiers see something they have all probably seen before or be sent home in body bags because we got careless? I say the former.

I expect they won't make them strip at all. I do recall that in the Iran-Iraq war, POW's were shown shirtless, apparently that is pretty standard surrender procedure in the region.

Pretty hard to hide real explosives big enough to kill a bunch of people on the pelvis or along the legs, even with baggy pants. Suicide bombers don't go for one-to-one exchanges. They seem to have a need to take at least 5-10 people with them. And that usually only happens on a bus or in a crowd or some other very confined space where their explosives are more effective.

Also, you have to consider that planting a suicide bomber in the midst of a large group might be difficult because the soldiers trying to surrender might worry that they might get shot if they allow a suicide bomber to kill their captors.

At any rate, I think our military has a good enough handle on the problem. Except maybe for how to feed and handle so many of them over a very long supply line. But I'm content to leave it to the professionals, not the armchair generals.
13 posted on 03/16/2003 4:43:14 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Probably just to their briefs. We have womenfolk among our soldiers.

As a womanfolk, I'd rather look at a bunch of butt-ugly naked men than get blown up by a suicide bomber.

The naked men might have a problem being surveyed by a mixed crowd, however.

14 posted on 03/16/2003 4:54:51 PM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
My first solution too.

Prairie

Safety first!

15 posted on 03/16/2003 5:03:04 PM PST by teletech (Can we bomb Saddam, NOW!?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
I doubt any of this will happen. Let the military professionals handle it. The danger is pretty small compared to the climatic problems, NBC danger and regular combat hazards our troops will face.
16 posted on 03/16/2003 5:09:08 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
I imagine it will be similar to what we were told in RVN.

If a combatant tries to surrender to you, and fighting is still going on, you do not have to accept his surrender.
If all fighting stops, and they surrender en mass, then
volunteers will go out and begin to disarm them.

Volunteers, yeah right.
17 posted on 03/16/2003 5:09:53 PM PST by tet68 (Jeremiah 51:24 ..."..Before your eyes I will repay Babylon for all the wrong they have done in Zion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
I see you liked the way I typed my messages, LOL!
18 posted on 03/16/2003 6:24:14 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Which messages?
19 posted on 03/16/2003 6:29:48 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Real simple solution .... all EPW's strip and are searched .... THEN their clothes are searched and everything stripped of weapons.

If ANY prisoner resists ... shot all of them.

Precede this by a loudspeaker announcement in Arabic to prevent people from getting stupid.

20 posted on 03/16/2003 6:33:11 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Take charge of your destiny, or someone else will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson