Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China readies for future U.S. fight
CNN ^ | 3/25/03 | Willy Wo-Lap Lam

Posted on 03/26/2003 8:20:29 PM PST by AnimalLover

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

CHINA READIES FOR FUTURE U.S. FIGHT March 26, 2003 CNN reports: "The Iraqi war has convinced the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership that some form of confrontation with the U.S. could come earlier than expected. Beijing has also begun to fine-tune its domestic and security policies to counter the perceived threat of U.S. 'neo-imperialism.' As more emphasis is being put on boosting national strength and cohesiveness, a big blow could be dealt to both economic and political reform. That the new leadership has concluded China is coming up against formidable challenges in the short to medium term is evident from recent statements by President Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao. Hu indicated earlier this year Beijing must pay more attention to global developments so that 'China make good preparations before the rainstorm ... and be in a position to seize the initiative.' Wen also pointed out in the first meeting of the State Council, or cabinet, last Saturday the leadership 'must keep a cool head.' 'We must boost our consciousness about disasters and downturns -- and think about dangers in the midst of [apparent] safety,' he said

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: china; confrontation; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Nayt2
Honey, they can do it from Panama. They have been acquiring property down there just for this purpose.
21 posted on 03/27/2003 9:21:01 AM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nayt2
IMHO, China will NOT attack us UNLESS the Taiwanese declare independence, and we fight on the side of the TW
22 posted on 03/27/2003 9:22:16 AM PST by The Pheonix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Pheonix
Who do you think is rattling North Korea?
23 posted on 03/27/2003 9:22:46 AM PST by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
a friend of mine who served in the Canadian reserves (48th Highlanders) in the early 90s told me much of their training was in preparation for fighting the Chinese. Take that for what it's worth, but they're a proud unit.
24 posted on 03/27/2003 9:24:56 AM PST by eBelasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nayt2
china isn't capable of attacking the us in the forseeable future. its simply impossible. the only place china could fight us is on the asian mainland, or maybe in japan.

A couple of megatons hidden in the hold of a COSCO ship berthed at the new LA facility would take out a big chunk of Southern California. Do you seriously believe that they would NOT do so?

25 posted on 03/27/2003 9:30:19 AM PST by JimRed (Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Hal Lindsey is great.
26 posted on 03/27/2003 9:32:28 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
You won't get a response discouraging ANY Chinese development in California.

Dianne Feinstein will make sure of that - she and her husband have millions riding on Chinese trade with the U.S.

27 posted on 03/27/2003 9:34:35 AM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jmouse007
"Snort - Can Yu Beweeve it! - Snort - Snort"
These Stupid Merikans - Gave Us Owr Own Seaport!!

28 posted on 03/27/2003 9:36:32 AM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
You could add that it would be near impossible to trace it back to them as well.
29 posted on 03/27/2003 11:09:17 AM PST by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
bttt
30 posted on 03/27/2003 12:39:38 PM PST by Kudsman (LETS GET IT ON!!! The price of freedom is vigilance. Tyranny is free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
And you are correct...China has never made any bones about conquering the USA. Last I read, China was well on it's way to beating us as the world's leading economic power. They claimed it would take 20 years, but things are progressing so well that now they advise it will be under 10.

And Arthur Andersen verified their numbers, right?

31 posted on 03/27/2003 12:42:10 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
A couple of megatons hidden in the hold of a COSCO ship berthed at the new LA facility would take out a big chunk of Southern California. Do you seriously believe that they would NOT do so?

It would take out a SMALL chunk of Southern California.

And, just out of idle curiousity, what, EXACTLY, would China gain in return for detonating a thermonuclear bomb in Long Beach? What price would they pay in exchange?

In short, please give us a coherent theory of victory for the Chinese in the scenario you describe.

32 posted on 03/27/2003 12:46:19 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Why does everyone think it will be a military attack? An economic attack is far more likely. With Greenspan, Bernahke, and the rest of the band of arrogant apparatchniks at the Fed trashing out the dollar, an economic attack seems more likely. What would happen if China decided to convert their currency to a gold standard? How many foreigners would be interested in owning paper US dollars?
33 posted on 03/27/2003 12:57:06 PM PST by Cicero5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
Oh, we'll trace it alright.

By its Los Alamos "signature."

[Courtesy of the traitors KKKli'toon, Goreleone, O'Leary, Gubbnah-Bill Richardson, Lee Wen Ho et al!]
34 posted on 03/27/2003 1:00:05 PM PST by Brian Allen (I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
If a nuke was to blow up in a US port, what are the chances we would be able to tell exactly where it came from?
35 posted on 03/27/2003 1:05:38 PM PST by winodog (The problem is sin. The solution is Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: winodog
If a nuke was to blow up in a US port, what are the chances we would be able to tell exactly where it came from?

Close enough to unity that the odds of us NOT identifying the source of the device are roughly on a par with the odds of me hitting the gazillion dollar slot machine jackpot in Vegas...AFTER I get a date with Jennifer Love Hewitt.

A large enough device to destroy a large area limits the likely source down to a very few countries. The fallout products are easily identified by their unique trace elements.

36 posted on 03/27/2003 1:10:55 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
You could add that it would be near impossible to trace it back to them as well.

You could...if you wanted to be factually incorrect.

37 posted on 03/27/2003 1:12:08 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com; John H K
John HK has no credibility. He's a professional nay-sayer and rabble rouser, whose posts all essentially say the same thing: "this article is bullsh/t." He hardly ever contributes anything of value to a discussion.
38 posted on 03/27/2003 1:19:13 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
>>>COSCO

Probably take less than a platoon to get it back. Take the money, reposess later.

snooker
39 posted on 03/27/2003 1:21:06 PM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
John HK has no credibility. He's a professional nay-sayer and rabble rouser, whose posts all essentially say the same thing: "this article is bullsh/t." He hardly ever contributes anything of value to a discussion.

Honestly...his comments are more grounded in reality than those of the professional Chicken Littles and panic-mongerers.

40 posted on 03/27/2003 1:25:09 PM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson