Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld's Role as War Strategist Under Scrutiny
Reuters ^ | 3-30-03 | By Will Dunham

Posted on 03/30/2003 5:49:20 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2003 5:49:20 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Hit piece.

Liars and morons.
2 posted on 03/30/2003 5:50:22 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Where's the barf alert?
3 posted on 03/30/2003 5:51:31 AM PST by LarryM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
It's interesting to watch pack journalism at work. This is about the umteenth article about Rumsfeld's role in the planning and implementation of our war plan.
4 posted on 03/30/2003 5:52:01 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Have you kept track of how many of these types of stories are out today?

5 posted on 03/30/2003 5:53:11 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
It's interesting to watch pack journalism at work. This is about the umteenth article about Rumsfeld's role in the planning and implementation of our war plan.

It's likely to get much worse before it gets better...

6 posted on 03/30/2003 5:54:04 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rumsfeld's Reuters Role as War Strategist Correspondent Under Scrutiny
7 posted on 03/30/2003 5:54:39 AM PST by EggsAckley (A little more Shock and Awe, please. A little less Shuck and Jive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If it's Reuters criticising Rumsfeld, he must be spot on.

He's the new "Donald"
8 posted on 03/30/2003 5:55:31 AM PST by Blueflag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
rummy is getting under the rats skin
9 posted on 03/30/2003 5:56:41 AM PST by teokee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
They're just mad because their nice little office in Baghdad was put on the target list.

I say hit em again, there was way too much of it still standing.
10 posted on 03/30/2003 5:58:21 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Former, Retired, Press, they just hate to see someone suceed when they have failed.
11 posted on 03/30/2003 6:01:27 AM PST by gulfcoast6 (Never pass up the chance to keep you mouth shut.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Have you kept track of how many of these types of stories are out today?

 

Rumsfeld's Role as War Strategist Under Scrutiny
Reuters, UK - 12 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's influence in crafting
the plan for the Iraq war is facing scrutiny as it becomes apparent the ...

       Rumsfeld's war plan is hotly debated - Everett Herald
       Defense chief taking flak daily on war progress - Chicago Sun Times
       Prince and Subjects Were Let Down - Newsday
       The Globe and Mail - Hindustan Times - and more »

New Yorker Weekly: Rumsfeld 'Rejected War Planners' Advice
Voice of America - 4 hours ago
A published report says US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld rejected advice from
Pentagon military planners about the size and strength of the American ...

       Rumsfeld in the firing line - BBC
       Iran's UN ambassador critical of Rumsfeld strategy - ABC Online
       War planners at odd with Rumsfeld - Irib
       Melbourne Herald Sun

Rumsfeld's Imperious Style Turns Combative
New York Times - 15 hours ago
WASHINGTON, March 29 In the best of times, Donald H. Rumsfeld parried questions
from the Pentagon press corps in the same imperious way Professor Kingsfield ...

       A war of 'shock' turns complex - Boston Globe
       Hope and pray this Iraq war ends real soon - South Coast Today
       Syria rejects American charge - Toronto Star
 

12 posted on 03/30/2003 6:03:19 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (Let's Roll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
McCaffrey commanded all the units in Latin America. Now that's a real hot bed of military activity!

Gettin Civilians in charge of the military is a good thing and I can't believe the Pentagon called the shots when Clinton was prez.

However, I do remember a lot of people pissed at Rummy because he only asked for half the money for defense that people thought he should as for.

13 posted on 03/30/2003 6:04:39 AM PST by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
Since Barry McCaffrey while retired, still holds the rank of General as he did not resign his commission, the DOD should recall him to active duty and start court martial proceedings against him under the UCMJ Article.

888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

That would cool some of these arm chair generals.
14 posted on 03/30/2003 6:05:06 AM PST by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rumsfeld and the Bush administration have been allowed exactly zero mistakes in this war by the media and the Hollywood misfits....who in turn are anxious for another American failure.

This is just a repeat of how the Media and Hollywood lost the Vietnam war by carefully cultivating the public to aquire a loser's attitude.


15 posted on 03/30/2003 6:05:11 AM PST by rmvh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Reuters vs. Rumsfeld

Oh, such a tough decision as to whose side to take.

One is a press agency that sides with people who vow in the name of Allah to conduct a jihah to kill American civilian and military personnel.

Another is a Defense Secretary whose vow to destroy the terrorists and will accept no outcome but victory in defeating those who have vowed to kill American civilian and military personnel.

I really have to think about this before making a decision. ;-)
16 posted on 03/30/2003 6:06:17 AM PST by cgbg (We have seen the enemy--and it is Reuters, the New York Times, CNN, and CBS News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Little doubt that it is orchestrated.

What I hate most about this is that the desired affect is to create doubt, and cause more grief to those families who have lost family members in Iraq.

Picking up the banner where the so-called "PEACE" protesters, have failed so totally. Got to bring those poll numbers down.

This bunch has the same mindset of Saddam. Pure "evil".
17 posted on 03/30/2003 6:09:07 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
By the way I forgot to tell you, thank you so much for the list.

Have a good day.
18 posted on 03/30/2003 6:10:10 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Military analyst Jack Spencer of the Heritage Foundation said Rumsfeld is facing the huge task of bringing change to an institution, the military, that resists it mightily.

That's what this is all about. It really has nothing to do with the war in Iraq.
For what it's worth I'm sure Rumsfeld and the President knew they would come under this kind of attack.

"Bureaucracy defends the status quo long past the time when the quo has lost its status."
Laurence J. Peter (1919 - 1988)
19 posted on 03/30/2003 6:10:18 AM PST by Valin (Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Everyone seems to be forgetting that we needed to start this thing PRONTO!!

Plus the turks screwed us!

20 posted on 03/30/2003 6:11:22 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson