Skip to comments.
Busted! Lawrence Eagleburger outs the New York Times
Fox News - Hannity and Colmes
| 4-02-03
Posted on 04/02/2003 6:32:31 PM PST by jmstein7
Busted! Lawrence Eagleburger outs the New York Times
On Fox News Channels hit debate show Hannity and Colmes, former Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger inarguably exposed the anti-Bush bias of the New York Times for all to see. Secretary Eagleburger recounted how he was approached by the Times to write an op-ed piece. The Times told him, explicitly, to be critical of the administration.
This is an indisputable example of how the Times bends the news and its editorials to forward its radical left-wing agenda.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: antiamerican; antibush; bushbashing; culture; elections; enemywithin; extended; iraqifreedom; lovedclintonswars; mediabias; news; newyorktimes; ny; oldgraylady; propaganda; times; unamerican; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: jmstein7
I'm beginning to think that we need to recall our forces from Iraq. They are needed right here on the homefront to liberate us from the VLWC.
To: AndyJackson
Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy? :)
22
posted on
04/02/2003 6:49:04 PM PST
by
jmstein7
To: PhiKapMom
Hi PKMom! Fox deprived here...what's Liddy saying???
23
posted on
04/02/2003 6:51:01 PM PST
by
TEXOKIE
To: unaffiliated1
The photo didn't look like that at all IMO. When my husband got his daily copy of the L.A. Times yesterday he started spouting angrily, "Look, they are making it look like the soldier is pointing the gun at the civilian's head!"
He grumbled about it for the rest of the day. Today he feels totally vindicated in his instinct that the photo was to make the U.S. military look bad.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"How pathetic it must be to belong to a political party that views itself more important than the nation."
I have understood the Democraps to be just that for years. Totally power hungry maniacs. The people mean nothing to them.
I just hope a few more dems take a hard look at what they support from their leadership.
25
posted on
04/02/2003 6:51:11 PM PST
by
lawdude
To: Howlin
No..no..no. It was w/in the last few days.
And don't forget...Larry E. wasn't a big fan of this from the get'go. But smart pols know when "diplomacy" is dead.
H2O-Gate is now on with Sean. G.G. Liddy IS the REAL DEAL!
He also plugged 4/12 Rally in DC before his spot ended.
Mustang sends from "Malpaso" News.
26
posted on
04/02/2003 6:51:50 PM PST
by
Mustang
(Evil Thrives When Good People Do Nothing!)
To: AndyJackson
"I'm beginning to think that we need to recall our forces from Iraq. They are needed right here on the homefront to liberate us from the VLWC."We don't need our troops to liberate us from the VLWC, they're doing a damn fine job of self destructing all by themselves
27
posted on
04/02/2003 6:52:21 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(We're Rolling)
To: demkicker
The person who talked to Eagleburger is not important. The order would come from the top! = Howell Raines!
28
posted on
04/02/2003 6:52:36 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: jmstein7
Ho-Hum...tell us something we DON'T know...
To: lawdude
The people mean nothing to them. Yeah, a good cartoonist would have the Dems using American children as human shields.
To: CHICAGOFARMER
You can play taps brother but frankly thats a disgrace...
Dig a mass grave and Take a D9 and push them all in and bury them.
Taps is for heros
Comment #33 Removed by Moderator
To: jmstein7
I hope they pursue this as a story.
To: jmstein7
>>>Boycott the NY Times!No respectable conservative should have anything to do with liberal publications like the NYTimes. 90% of American's have never even read the Times. Outside of leftwingers, who needs them.
To: unaffiliated1
Is the man in blue carrying Elian?
Who did Hannity quote, "It took Janet Reno a month to beat the Branch Davidians." I loved it!!!
36
posted on
04/02/2003 6:54:55 PM PST
by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texans)
To: patriciaruth
"He grumbled about it for the rest of the day. Today he feels totally vindicated in his instinct that the photo was to make the U.S. military look bad."
The soldier is not an American.
But that likely WAS the editor's intention.
37
posted on
04/02/2003 6:56:40 PM PST
by
Rockpile
To: William McKinley
"O'Reilly also had on how the LA Times ran a doctored photo on the front page making it look like a soldier was pointing his weapon at unarmed civilians." Yup. I've seen all the before - after photos here on FR.
38
posted on
04/02/2003 6:57:30 PM PST
by
blam
To: lonestar
39
posted on
04/02/2003 6:58:24 PM PST
by
jmstein7
To: unaffiliated1
My husband predicted the take down of the WTC in 1992. He's pretty savvy. He and David Horowitz had a nice little conversation about their renounced liberal days in a cloakroom at one of the 2001 Inaugural Balls. Like Horowitz he is savvy about libs and people.
You just aren't as aware of all the lib's mean, dirty little visual tricks that these guys are.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson