1 posted on
04/04/2003 6:45:05 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: kattracks
HMMMMMMM.
2 posted on
04/04/2003 6:45:40 AM PST by
CholeraJoe
(Standing tough under Stars and Stripes)
To: kattracks
BTTT
3 posted on
04/04/2003 6:45:58 AM PST by
TonyInOhio
(Never assume it's a raisin.)
To: kattracks
But I thought Blix said there weren't any of such things in Iraq! There must be some mistake. This war was all about oil, wasn't it?
4 posted on
04/04/2003 6:46:42 AM PST by
iceskater
To: kattracks
Do the Iraqis use this water for their own drinking water?
5 posted on
04/04/2003 6:46:59 AM PST by
CheneyChick
(Lock & Load)
To: All
Said Hans Blix, "I am confident that is not mustard agent or any other proscribed agent, but is instead French's Mustard, which Iraq long ago declared to have in mass quantities."
To: kattracks
Nonsense. It is mustard from falafels. Infidels will find nothing.
7 posted on
04/04/2003 6:47:29 AM PST by
Sender
To: kattracks
Maybe we should send Hans over there to taste test it.
8 posted on
04/04/2003 6:47:44 AM PST by
gunnedah
To: kattracks
Stored under the river or dumped into the river??????
To: kattracks
Was it diluted in the river, or found in containers?
10 posted on
04/04/2003 6:47:48 AM PST by
SarahW
To: kattracks
How much of these agents were found in the water? Residue? Or have they poisoned the water supply in a scorched earth policy? Big difference between two possibilities.
To: kattracks
I'm sure those evil americans dumped it in upstream of baghdad. They'll stoop to anything just to discredit a fine european analyst like blix [/sarcasm]
To: kattracks
so that was the plan..
17 posted on
04/04/2003 6:48:49 AM PST by
ewing
To: kattracks
Impossible. The strict U.N. Inspection team from 1991 to this year prevented such chemicals from being in their inventory.</sarcasm off
V
18 posted on
04/04/2003 6:48:53 AM PST by
Beck_isright
(If Susan Sarandon pooped in the woods, would ELF boycott her?)
To: kattracks
OOOOHhhh, this is going to make the environmentalist antiwar protestors mad. Saddam could blow away all his people, kill all our guys, but for heavens sake, he contaminated a river? Its going to get ugly quick :)
22 posted on
04/04/2003 6:51:13 AM PST by
Cate
((LET FREEDOM RING!!!!))
To: kattracks
I remember seeing a report where Saddam would go "fishing" by throwing grenades into the river, and having his lackeys scoop up the fish (now why haven't we ever seen that on the American Sportsman?). It is obvious to anyone with half a brain (Blix, perhaps), that these chemicals in the river are just another fishing technique.
To: kattracks
I wonder whether, in attempts to get rid of excess stocks by soldiers in the field that want to give up, these idjits are dumping it in the river.
The other reason could be Saddam wants to poison the populous AND the coalition; however, I don't know about how the 'dilution-factor' would affect the effectiveness of theses substances.
24 posted on
04/04/2003 6:51:36 AM PST by
DoctorMichael
(Liberalism = Evil)
To: kattracks
Could this have any connection to the underground tunnels from the Airport to the Rivers?
26 posted on
04/04/2003 6:52:18 AM PST by
Solson
(Terrorists of the world: IGNITE!)
To: kattracks
Not good!
28 posted on
04/04/2003 6:54:46 AM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: kattracks
Maybe they need to be dredging the rivers?
No telling WHAT the Bad Guys have thrown in there!
Tia
31 posted on
04/04/2003 6:58:08 AM PST by
tiamat
("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
To: kattracks
1. ] Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.
32 posted on
04/04/2003 6:58:14 AM PST by
per loin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson