Skip to comments.
Academician Kolesnikov: The Virus of Atypical Pneumonia Has Been Created Artifically (SARS)
Russian Information Agency Novosti ^
| 4/11/03
| Alexander Batalin
Posted on 04/11/2003 8:43:20 AM PDT by Heartlander2
The virus of atypical pneumonia has been created artificially, possibly as a bacteriological weapon, believes Sergei Kolesnikov, Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences.
He expressed this opinion at a news conference in Irkutsk (Siberia) on Thursday.
According to him, the virus of atypical pneumonia is a synthesis of two viruses (of measles and infectious parotiditis or mumps), the natural compound of which is impossible. This can be done only in a laboratory, the academician is convinced. He also said that in creating bacteriological weapons a protective anti-viral vaccine is, as a rule, worked out at the same time. Therefore, the scientist believes, a medicine for atypical pneumonia may soon appear. He does not exclude that the spread of the virus could have begun accidentally, as a result of "an unsanctioned leakage" from a laboratory.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: biologicalweapon; biowarfare; coronavirus; niman; sars; vaccine; virus
To: Heartlander2
Accidental leakage!!!! Why else would China try to keep it mum???
To: All
|
Attention!
|
 |
| Our troops give so much of themselves, and we all benefit from their efforts. The next time you look at your bank balance, why not find some way to take some money and put it towards supporting the members of our armed services in some way? Maybe find a family who has someone serving, and buy them dinner, or some groceries, or a gift for their children? Maybe find a way to contribute to a fund for the memory of any of those who have fallen? Our armed forces deserve our support in tangible ways.
|
3
posted on
04/11/2003 8:49:52 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Heartlander2
And this crap started where? China?
MEGA- 
Stay Strong
Fuzzy
4
posted on
04/11/2003 8:50:24 AM PDT
by
fuzzy122
To: fuzzy122
And it started on the same day we invaded Iraq.
My husband owes me big time. He's been making fun of me for calling this a bio attack by China.
My intent was that China was going to use it to invade Hong Kong and Taiwan under the pretense of "quarantined" and try to engage us in a war with them and North Korea.
To: mabelkitty
And it started on the same day we invaded Iraq. Uhhhh....Not exactly.
I remember hearing of it in February. I believe I've seen articles mentioning somewhere around November for a start.
6
posted on
04/11/2003 8:58:20 AM PDT
by
toast
To: Heartlander2
They make wonderful fur-lined tinfoil hats in Russia
To: Heartlander2
Hehe... I just love those crazy Russians, always the jokers. In related news, check out
Pravda for even more enlightened stories! You'll be thrilled to read how there's going to be a nuclear holocaust due to our bombs unearthing low-grade radioactive materials around Baghdad, and flooding in Russia due to techtonic shifts and earthquakes caused by the concussion of our bunker busters!
Really, though, their capacity for the dramatic and the suspicion of all evils never ceases to amaze me. As if they think there's some vast conspiracy... hey... wait...
8
posted on
04/11/2003 9:00:36 AM PDT
by
z84976
To: Nubbytwanger
They make wonderful fur-lined tinfoil hats in RussiaBeat me to it!
9
posted on
04/11/2003 9:01:09 AM PDT
by
freebilly
(I think they've misunderestimated us....)
To: mabelkitty
My intent was that China was going to use it to invade Hong Kong Invade Hong Kong?
That would be like China invading Shanghai or Tianjin, or the United States invading Pittsburgh.
To: Heartlander2
I think the Russian scientist needs to understand that evolution is a powerful thing and obviously this virus is a natural mutuation, the likes of which must have happened millions of times in order for my Grandmother to have evolved from a mollusk.
11
posted on
04/11/2003 9:04:02 AM PDT
by
Rippin
More on this story here:
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1346560,00.html Sars biological weapon?
Moscow - The deadly pneumonia that has killed more than 100 people around the world may be a man-made biological weapon, Russian experts said on Friday.
Nikolai Filatov, head of Moscow's epidemiological services, told the Gazeta daily that he thought the pneumonia was man-made because "there is no vaccine for this virus, its make-up is unclear, it has not been very widespread and the population is not immune to it."
Yet he had some reservations, since the virus has a low mortality rate - so far killing 4% of those infected -, and because it is relatively difficult to pass on - through direct contact or inhalation.
The virus, according to academy of medecine member Sergei Kolesnikov, is a cocktail of mumps and measles, whose mix could never appear in nature.
"We can only get that in a laboratory," he told a conference in the Siberian city of Irkutsk, quoted by RIA Novosti news agency.
It may have spread because of an "accidental leak" from a lab, he added.
More than 100 people have died and some 3 000 others have been infected by Severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars), which is believed to have originated in China's southern Guangdong province.
To: Heartlander2
To: Heartlander2
Ah the movie "The Patriot" the ONE with Stephen Segal comes to mind over this one.........we shall see!
To: Uncle George
Accidental...what about the so called "super-spreaders" as airline stews or as one passenger who was found to be shuttling back and forth between SE Asia and the USA
15
posted on
04/11/2003 9:15:42 AM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: mabelkitty
My intent was that China was going to use it to invade Hong Kong and Taiwan under the pretense of "quarantined" and try to engage us in a war with them and North Korea.Why am I'm not surprised that you haven't noticed that Great Britain GAVE Hong Kong to China several years ago?
I'm also not surprised that you'd claim something from the Russian media quoting a scientist who, as best I can tell, has never actually seen or worked with the SARS virus personally, as "proof" of your belief it's a bioweapon.
It's a fascinating excercise in psychology but it makes people feel better that bad things that happen naturally were somehow deliberately caused by humans...from viruses to earthquakes. Makes the earth seem less random and less frightening, oddly enough.
16
posted on
04/11/2003 9:26:03 AM PDT
by
John H K
To: toast
The Chinese CLAIM it started in November or so, but why did they wait to release the info until the DAY WE ATTACKED IRAQ. And they still aren't being helpful with information considering that Hong Kong is about to have its medical establishment fall because of so many sick doctors and staff. The timing is too suspicious
To: z84976
"Hehe... I just love those crazy Russians, always the jokers. In related news, check out Pravda for even more enlightened stories! You'll be thrilled to read how there's going to be a nuclear holocaust due to our bombs unearthing low-grade radioactive materials around Baghdad, and flooding in Russia due to techtonic shifts and earthquakes caused by the concussion of our bunker busters! ""Really, though, their capacity for the dramatic and the suspicion of all evils never ceases to amaze me. As if they think there's some vast conspiracy.."
Pravda is the Russian equivilent of the National Inquirer. Would it be safe to say that you read the National Enquirer to find out what Americans think of the world?
18
posted on
04/11/2003 10:48:31 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Rippin
"I think the Russian scientist needs to understand that evolution is a powerful thing and obviously this virus is a natural mutuation, the likes of which must have happened millions of times in order for my Grandmother to have evolved from a mollusk.""Obviously"? It certainly isn't obvious to me. Perhaps you have information you are not sharing with the rest of us.
I am not inclined to believe it is man made, but the possibility exists. As far as I know it is pretty clear that no one knows where SARS came from, or if someone does, they are keeping silent. I think I will reserve judgement for now.
19
posted on
04/11/2003 10:57:07 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Heartlander2
The BBC made a TV series called "Survivers" that had this whole thing as it's primus. PBS in Dallas ran it back in the late 80s or early 90s.
20
posted on
04/11/2003 11:02:59 AM PDT
by
fella
To: Uncle George
I agree - and the CDC was not happy about their lack of cooperation.
21
posted on
04/11/2003 12:11:27 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: mabelkitty
I don't think I would call it a bio-war or bio-terror attack. I think the ChiComs have an active, on-going bio-warfare program, and one or more of their researchers got contaminated. Due to faulty (or non-existant) containment protocols, the "bug" got loose.
As I have posted on other threads, SARS is no laughing matter. It spreads as easily as the common cold and has a 4% kill ratio. Maybe another 4% of the infected population will suffer extensive pulmonary damage. And there is no guarantee that you can't catch this "cold" a second time. No one knows how long the natural anti-bodies from surviors continue on in their systems. Unlike the measles, where a survivor is unlikely to catch them a second time, who knows about SARS.
CDC should be working like crazy on a serum or vaccine. Forget AIDS research. Most people are not at rick for AIDS. Everybody (by definition) is at risk for a pandemic like SARS.
To: mabelkitty
I have thought it was bio-terror from day one. Just too suspicious that a whole new virus, with fatal possibilities, shows up all of a sudden.
23
posted on
04/11/2003 1:14:00 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(Hollywood celebrities, just like the French, actually think their opinions matter! Shuddup Chirac!)
To: John H K
The Brits did not "give" Hong Kong to the Chinese. They had the former Crown Colony on a 99-year lease from the Chinese, and the lease was up. The Brits did not have the forethought to renegotiate the lease with Taiwan before they recognized the ChiComs as the rightful government of the mainland.
To: Heartlander2
Its part of a Chinese government plan to thin out their population. They knew it wouldnt be as harmful to healthy well fed Americans as it would to their own people. This might also take care of our North Korea problem as well. /Dale Gribble
To: Heartlander2
News obviously artificially created by Russian new agency.
26
posted on
04/11/2003 1:54:41 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: Heartlander2
South China is the notorious hotbed for the transmission of domestic animal pathogens to humans. No need to come up with a diabolical explanation when a natural one is right at hand.
27
posted on
04/11/2003 1:59:11 PM PDT
by
Plutarch
To: capitan_refugio
"The Brits did not "give" Hong Kong to the Chinese. They had the former Crown Colony on a 99-year lease from the Chinese, and the lease was up."
Actually, from what I recall, the 99-year lease that expired in 1997 was for the "New Territories" on the mainland, not for Hong Kong Island, the Kowloon Peninsula or several small islands, which China had ceded to the UK in perpetuity. But since the Brits weren't interested in giving back the New Territories and keeping the rest of Hong Kong (it would be like keeping Manhattan and Staten Island but returning the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens to the Commies), they just returned all of Hong Kong.
"The Brits did not have the forethought to renegotiate the lease with Taiwan before they recognized the ChiComs as the rightful government of the mainland."
That's pretty cool, I had never thought of that, although I don't think the Brits would have tempted the Red Chinese in such a way. The Brits probably wouldn't think it was worth it to risk a war by their "insult" of the Red Chinese by signing such a treaty with the Nationalist Government in Taiwan.
28
posted on
04/11/2003 2:35:01 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: AuH2ORepublican
You recall correctly. The lease did apply only to the "New Territories." The question of Hong Kong Island depended on whether one accepted the validity of 1842 Treaty of Nanking, or the 1841 Chuen Pi Convention. The ChiComs contended Hong Kong was taken by the British in 1841 under the "invalid" and "unsigned" Convention. The British contended Hong Kong was ceded under the 1842 Treaty.
It's a moot point now. In a year Hong Kong and southern China may be severely depopulated.
29
posted on
04/11/2003 3:28:39 PM PDT
by
capitan_refugio
("Extremism in defence of liberty is no vice; moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.")
To: monday
I was just making fun of evolutionists. More obvious apparent evidence of design than this crossing of viruses is routinely attributed to the accumulation of small mutations and natural selection but in a case like this scientists jump to the "design inference" almost immediately.
30
posted on
04/11/2003 9:41:43 PM PDT
by
Rippin
To: Rippin; CathyRyan; Mother Abigail; Dog Gone; Petronski; per loin; riri; flutters; Judith Anne; ...
"Niman" (Dr. Henry Niman of Harvard?) has this to say today on
Agonist SARS Board:
Although the possible accidental release from a bioweapons program remains unlikely, the finding of a "natural" version of SARS coronavirus in 2 (and possibly many more) species in China, makes an accidental release of a lethal mutant a more likely possibility.
The vast majority of SARS isolates from patients have a 29 nt deletion, which is the type of change that could be man-made. However, although it still seems rather unlikely, the identification of several animal isolates, and one human isolate, GZ01, with the 29 nt present, changes the bioterror odds somewhat.
To: aristeides
Very interesting. Dr. Niman is well-respected in his field.
To: All
To: aristeides
Yep, just keep on thinking you're Columbo or Furhman.
The clues are in plain sight.
34
posted on
06/03/2003 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: aristeides
My bad: "Niman" is just a poster on that board; this apparently was not something said by Dr. Henry Niman.
To: js1138
I agree, especially when I read this:
According to him, the virus of atypical pneumonia is a synthesis of two viruses (of measles and infectious parotiditis or mumps), the natural compound of which is impossible. This can be done only in a laboratory, the academician is convinced.
Someone needs to tell this "scientist" that the SARS virus is from the coronaviridae group (common cold) and NOT the paramyxoviridae group (measles, mumps, etc.).
36
posted on
06/03/2003 9:39:17 AM PDT
by
Judith Anne
(The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits.)
To: Prince Charles
As my question mark indicates, I was unsure whether "Niman" on the board is the famous Dr. Niman. Have you been able to determine that the poster is a different person?
To: Mitchell
Ping to #31 and #32.
Someone's stock seems to have risen,
perhaps in more ways than one.
38
posted on
06/03/2003 11:16:11 AM PDT
by
Allan
To: aristeides
Well, unless the poster "niman" chooses to reveal him/herself more forthrightly, it can't be said that this is Dr. Henry Niman... but the poster seems to be knowledgeable about the topics discussed.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson