Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Total Information Awareness Project Undergoes First Test
Information Week ^ | 4/10/03 | Aaron Ricadela

Posted on 04/11/2003 11:08:59 AM PDT by Pro-Bush

Pentagon (news - web sites) researchers this month completed the first set of test data for the controversial Total Information Awareness system, a key technologist for the project says.

Lt. Col. Doug Dyer, a program manager at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa), said at an IBM-sponsored conference on data privacy in Almaden, Calif., this week that Americans must trade some privacy for security. "Three thousand people died on 9/11. When you consider the potential effect of a terrorist attack against the privacy of an entire population, there has to be some trade-off," Dyer says.

Total Information Awareness, an experimental computer system being developed by Darpa under Vice Adm. John Poindexter, seeks to scan information about passport, visa, and work-permit applications, plus information about purchases of airline tickets, hotel rooms, over-the-counter drugs, and chemicals--both here and abroad--to discern "signature" patterns of terrorist behavior. Congressional leaders have criticized the system's potential to spy on Americans and agreed to restrict further research and development without consulting Congress.

Signals of potential terrorist activity are likely to be weak amid a field of data "noise," Dyer says. TIA is designed to seek patterns that could indicate terrorist behavior while preserving people's anonymity, he adds. "We're testing our hypothesis on nothing but synthetic data."

Total Information Awareness, the keystone project of Darpa's Information Awareness Office, incorporates language-translation, data-searching and pattern-recognition, and decision-support technologies, according to the project's Web site. According to Dyer, the system won't scan "irrelevant" personal information about Americans, such as medical records, but could consider records of over-the-counter drug purchases, which could indicate planning of a bioterrorist attack.

Dyer says the initial experiment data set, completed this month, could also consider relationships between purchases of certain chemicals, whether the buyer or a family member was involved in an activity such as farming that could explain a benign reason for the purchase, and where the purchase was made.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: darpa; tia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I would like to know what companies are providing this technology. Software providers, Data-mining, ERP, intrusion detection & alert, etc.
1 posted on 04/11/2003 11:08:59 AM PDT by Pro-Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered


2 posted on 04/11/2003 11:10:54 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
According to Dyer, the system won't scan "irrelevant" personal information about Americans, such as medical records, but could consider records of over-the-counter drug purchases, which could indicate planning of a bioterrorist attack.

And just how are they gonna get THIS data?

3 posted on 04/11/2003 11:11:32 AM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush; Fred Mertz; Remedy
"We're testing our hypothesis on nothing but synthetic data."

That should be quite interesting - developing a set of assumptions and then developing a set of test data containing data that matches those assumptions to see if the data models can detect patterns. I'm SURE our terrorist enemies will be this considerate when they leave their data trails for TIA to detect. "Dammit, Achmid, quit being so rude! Don't pay cash for that! Use your credit card so TIA can spot it!"

4 posted on 04/11/2003 11:14:22 AM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Guess I better rip up my Abertsons and Safeway discount card.
5 posted on 04/11/2003 11:14:30 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (Iran/ Syria = Gulf War III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Guess I better rip up my Abertsons and Safeway discount card.

The more I think about TIA, the more ludicrous the notion gets. I get very few telemarketing calls and very little junk mail. Why? Because I try to pay cash as often as possible (the exception being gasoline, it's very convenient to pay at the pump, but gasoline purchases only tell someone a pattern of roughly where I travel). It won't be too hard for terrorists to avoid leaving a significant data trail - the reason so much data is available for most Americans is that they don't care how much data they leave in their wake. But terrorists will care.

And much of the data that the creators of TIA want simply isn't available legally. For example, one item TIA wants to trace is gun purchases - but if someone makes a $400 charge at Wal-Mart, did they buy a gun or a Stairmaster? TIA would need to tap into the background check database, something they are prohibited by law from doing. So when they talk about what they want to capture, some of the data is commercial available, but much of it will require legal changes that I will not support.

6 posted on 04/11/2003 11:19:41 AM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
So when they talk about what they want to capture, some of the data is commercial available, but much of it will require legal changes that I will not support.

I agree!

Speaking at an oversight hearing of the House subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations, and the Census last week, Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va., said overregulating the government's use of data mining could stifle its potential as a weapon to identify possible terrorists and limit its effectiveness as a tool to eradicate government fraud and make government more efficient.
7 posted on 04/11/2003 11:30:24 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (Iran/ Syria = Gulf War III)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Two articles that agree with your comments:

It won't be too hard for terrorists to avoid leaving a significant data trail

The Pentagon's Total Information Awareness Project: Americans ... Terrorists already immerse themselves in mainstream society, even using their real names and official government documents. They can learn and anticipate the trigger patterns that will supposedly generate red flags, and then avoid them. You won't see terrorists buying one-way airline tickets, for example. Because terrorists will resemble ordinary people, TIA inevitably means magnifying-glass surveillance of ordinary folks, wasting more time, all in a vicious, misdirected circle.

So when they talk about what they want to capture, some of the data is commercial available, but much of it will require legal changes that I will not support.
The New American - Insider Report - March 24, 2003

Bush loyalists who cannot conceive of the current White House putting such power to despotic purposes should contemplate the fact that sooner or later this power will be wielded by an Al Gore or a Hillary Rodham Clinton. Those who recall the recent Clinton era should not have trouble imagining a situation in the not too distant future when pro-lifers, home schoolers, gun owners, vocal constitutionalists, and other patriots are officially designated as security threats.

Beyond the danger of intentional despotism, there is the danger inherent in all bureaucracies. According to the Federal Register, information collected by CAPPS II would be kept on file for 50 years. Ever suffer the humiliation, frustration, and costly inconvenience of a bad credit report that falsely charged you with a nonexistent billing or bankruptcy, or other misreported financial dealings? Millions of people have faced such ordeals. Getting the credit reporting agencies to correct these mistakes can be a near-impossible undertaking. Imagine trying to get the federal bureaucracy to correct your CAPPS II security file so you can fly.

According to a February 28th CNN report, Transportation Department spokesman Chet Lunner said the Federal Register notice stating the background information will be stored for 50 years is inaccurate. Mr. Lunner said such information will be held only for people deemed security risks. Verbal statements by spokesmen like Mr. Lunner, however, do not override printed regulations. And even if the Federal Register is corrected to reflect a policy in line with Mr. Lunner’s statement, it doesn’t provide any assurance against continued encroachments or solve the problems facing travelers falsely labeled as security threats.

Will Americans soon have to undergo similar screening for train, bus, and subway transportation as well? Will it progress to internal checkpoints on streets and highways: "May we see your identification and travel documents please?" Meanwhile, many of the same legislators acquiescing to these new restrictions on American citizens also are supporting amnesty for millions of illegal aliens and failing to enforce our borders.

 

 

8 posted on 04/11/2003 11:43:30 AM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: dirtboy
And just how are they gonna get THIS data?

They're not. That's the great thing. The only way for this to work is for "the government" to get its hands on data sets that don't exist.

TIA will flop around for a few years and then die when someone in Congress says, "Hey, it's been five years and umpteen million dollars and TIA hasn't caught one person."

10 posted on 04/11/2003 11:49:55 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And much of the data that the creators of TIA want simply isn't available legally. For example, one item TIA wants to trace is gun purchases - but if someone makes a $400 charge at Wal-Mart, did they buy a gun or a Stairmaster?

Gosh, why don't they just ask Wal-Mart?

TIA would need to tap into the background check database, something they are prohibited by law from doing. So when they talk about what they want to capture, some of the data is commercial available, but much of it will require legal changes that I will not support.

Actually, finding out that you bought a gun from Wal-Mart is a matter of paying Wal-Mart for access to their database. Wal-Mart knows what you bought.

11 posted on 04/11/2003 11:53:05 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"The more I think about TIA, the more ludicrous the notion gets. I get very few telemarketing calls and very little junk mail. Why? Because I try to pay cash as often as possible (the exception being gasoline, it's very convenient to pay at the pump, but gasoline purchases only tell someone a pattern of roughly where I travel). It won't be too hard for terrorists to avoid leaving a significant data trail - the reason so much data is available for most Americans is that they don't care how much data they leave in their wake. But terrorists will care."


Interestingly enough, your lack of a pattern may actually be a pattern, as far as TIA goes. Since most Americans leave a long and detailed trail of their purchases, I'd assume that suspicion would accrue to those who don't.

I could be wrong, but it may just be that your pattern is one that will cause you extra grief.
12 posted on 04/11/2003 11:56:30 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"Hey, it's been five years and umpteen million dollars and TIA hasn't caught one person."

... so we have to spend more money on it.

I would take the government more seriously on this, except for the fact that they had everything they needed to stop the 9/11 attack except for the will to ask for a search warrant. Political correctness stopped that, political correctness prevents TSA from doing anything useful at the airports, and political correctness will stop this from being useful for stopping terrorism. Useful for internal surveillance and tyranny, yes. Preventing terrorism, no.

13 posted on 04/11/2003 11:57:12 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Donate to FR. End the fundraising quagmire against the Fedayeen Snuggles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"And just how are they gonna get THIS data?

They're not. That's the great thing. The only way for this to work is for "the government" to get its hands on data sets that don't exist."

Don't they? I wonder. OTC drug sales...well, if you buy your OTC stuff at the supermarket and use your discount card, there will be a record. I suspect that there are more records than we know, to tell the truth.
14 posted on 04/11/2003 11:58:47 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"Actually, finding out that you bought a gun from Wal-Mart is a matter of paying Wal-Mart for access to their database. Wal-Mart knows what you bought."

Bingo. But, the feds won't have to pay for that data, IMO. They'll just make it mandatory that they have access to it.
15 posted on 04/11/2003 11:59:45 AM PDT by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Personally, I buy most of my OTC stuff at Wal Mart. No shopper card, cheaper prices. (WAY cheaper.) No record.
16 posted on 04/11/2003 12:01:31 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
But, the feds won't have to pay for that data, IMO. They'll just make it mandatory that they have access to it.

Don't bet on it.

17 posted on 04/11/2003 12:01:55 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Gosh, why don't they just ask Wal-Mart?

Where is the legal mechanism to compel Wal-Mart to release that data?

Actually, finding out that you bought a gun from Wal-Mart is a matter of paying Wal-Mart for access to their database. Wal-Mart knows what you bought.

Now, what if I paid cash and did not provide my name at checkout?

18 posted on 04/11/2003 12:03:10 PM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Where is the legal mechanism to compel Wal-Mart to release that data?

None needed. The gummint just pays Wal-Mart's going rate for extranet connectivity.

Now, what if I paid cash and did not provide my name at checkout?

Except that, in the case of firearms purchases...that isn't an option.

19 posted on 04/11/2003 12:07:21 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Since most Americans leave a long and detailed trail of their purchases, I'd assume that suspicion would accrue to those who don't. I could be wrong, but it may just be that your pattern is one that will cause you extra grief.

However, does not leaving a data trail rise to the level of probable cause? In order for your idea to bear fruition to the feds, IMO they would have to significantly lower the threshhold of probable cause. There are many, many people who are concerned about their privacy but are not engaging in criminal activity - whereas probable cause means there is a clear indication that the suspect activity rises to the criminal.

20 posted on 04/11/2003 12:08:13 PM PDT by dirtboy (United States 2, Terror-sponsoring regimes 0, waiting to see who's next in the bracket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson