Skip to comments.
Study: 20 percent of war deaths are blacks
The Commercial Appeal ^
| 4/12/03
| Thomas Hargrove
Posted on 04/12/2003 5:32:41 AM PDT by GailA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
FYI
1
posted on
04/12/2003 5:32:41 AM PDT
by
GailA
To: All
SHOW YOUR PRIDE! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
2
posted on
04/12/2003 5:33:32 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: mhking
ping
3
posted on
04/12/2003 5:36:00 AM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(Bush/Rice 2004- pray & fast for our troops this lent)
To: GailA
"African Americans are, relatively speaking, over-represented in the military. But the real point of the spear, groups like Special Ops, are almost lily white," Segal said. Is Segal implying some sort of nefarious discrimination schemes here, or what?
I'd like to know just why any of this matters to The Commercial Appeal?
Forty years ago, the de-segregation warriors such as MLK and Jesse Jackson at least in his own mind) were talking about their desire for a colorblind society. How can there be a colorblind society when this sort of nonsense is continually made much of?
4
posted on
04/12/2003 5:42:33 AM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: GailA
It was just a matter of time before the race card was used, now we know how. These people make me want to puke. And am I the only one tired of all the coverage on looting? Even FOX is overdoing it.
5
posted on
04/12/2003 5:43:14 AM PDT
by
OneVike
To: GailA
Jesse Jackson will be pimping this story before noon eastern time.
To: jimtorr
How can there be a colorblind society when this sort of nonsense is continually made much of? Colorblindness doesn't pay.
To: GailA
This constant obsession with race in all affairs is becoming more than just annoying, it is becoming boring.
8
posted on
04/12/2003 5:45:25 AM PDT
by
Blennos
(hoste, opto ut seis felicior.)
To: GailA
Nearly 100 per cent of the KIA American soldiers were men
Now the race flap will be brought out.
9
posted on
04/12/2003 5:46:00 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: GailA
Let's see blacks comprise 20% of the military and 19.4% of the deaths. Boy, I can see what all the outrage is about.
To: GailA
Uh...there's a lot left out of this story. How many were left handed? How many were short? How many were from broken homes? How many were dyslexic? How mahy knew the hearbreak of psoriasis? etc.
If we are gonna count victim groups, let's count 'em all.
11
posted on
04/12/2003 5:50:43 AM PDT
by
Drango
(Two wrongs don't make a right...but three lefts do!)
To: GailA
The study found the race of 19.4 percent of all fatalities in which race was able to be determined was black. African Americans represent 20 percent of all military personnel...This is exactly the quota demanded by affirmative action. The quota would not be exactly as it is supposed to be if we subtract the white dead killed by the black muslim sgt but he must have been from the naacp and knew how to keep things pc.
12
posted on
04/12/2003 5:51:58 AM PDT
by
RWG
To: Tijeras_Slim
What realy gets there crank is we rescued the wrong female soldier.
13
posted on
04/12/2003 5:52:17 AM PDT
by
OneVike
To: Drango
So seven more casualties were African American than might have otherwise been had we had absolute parity.
With highest respect to the lost, I ask: how is this of any meaning whatsoever? Especially given the 100 or so casualties overall? Somebody needs to learn the meaning of 'statistal sampling error' before they rant!
To: GailA
military experts warn that this is a difficult statistic to prove unofficially since ethnicity is self-defined. Hmmmmm. We can 'define' our own ethnicity? I will have to keep that in mind when my [white] daughter applies for college.
To: GailA
Hispanic casualties, although difficult to calculate exactly, also appear to be risingWhy does the article switch from discussing fatalities to discussing casualties? Or does "casualties" mean "fatalities"?
And wouldn't including the seriously injured result in a better indicator of who is fighting in "dangerous" situations? In a given dangerous situation some soldiers die and some (though seriously injured) live.
Some soldiers in the same dangerous situation are uninjured or lightly injured, too.
16
posted on
04/12/2003 5:56:53 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(The Palestine Hotel sniper probably used a silencer, if he had ANY brains.)
To: Always Right
Let's see blacks comprise 20% of the military and 19.4% of the deaths. Boy, I can see what all the outrage is about. How about an international law barring the killing of enemy forces unless it is done according to a strict racial quota...
To: GailA
The racebaiters are already out in force I c. Blacks make up 17 or 18 per cent of the military age population. I don't c any statistical aberration here. It's a volunteer army too. I wonder how much Jackson and Sharpton will demand in "reparations" for this new "outrage".
To: GailA
The vast majority of people in the anti-war protest groups are white. Conclusion: the anti-war protest movement is racist.
19
posted on
04/12/2003 5:58:55 AM PDT
by
djpg
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson