Skip to comments.
What Is the Objectivist View of Libertarianism?
Objectivist Center ^
| 3/03
| David Kelley and William Thomas
Posted on 04/13/2003 3:40:52 PM PDT by RJCogburn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
So between two posts you go from claiming Objectivists are the bretheren of Communists to claiming that the Communists are right that Objectivists are the spawn of Satan. I can see you are not an Objectivist, because you are completely lacking in reason.
41
posted on
04/14/2003 7:56:22 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: OWK
True -- my post was intended more a comment on the fulminations of self-proclaimed Objectivists than a comment on the philosophy itself.
42
posted on
04/14/2003 7:58:35 AM PDT
by
steve-b
To: Cultural Jihad
Thanks for posting this pointy-headed article explaining the intricacies of Objectivism, Anarchism, Libertarianism, and Breatharianism.An article that might have produced some serious discussion on a subject that might be of interest to some.
Your comments are in poor form, IMO, adding nothing of substance.
43
posted on
04/14/2003 11:35:46 AM PDT
by
RJCogburn
(Yes, it's bold talk.....)
To: OWK
(who thinks that both libertarians and objectivists ignore the obvious conclusions to be drawn from the respective philosophies.)
That would nice, but Libertarianism as such doesn't address philisophy - just politics.
Only the most ill-informed, casual thinking Libertarians claim that their political party is an integrated philosophy.
It is entirely acceptable and non-contradictary to be a mystical, anti-reason, altruistic, collectivist dope smoker and still be a Libertarian. I have unfortunately met more like this than than any group this side of the Greens. This included *Democrats* (!)
Suffice it to say, these traits are not Objectivism.
I was a Libertarian before I wised up. I don't see what an Objectivist can learn from "Libertarianism".
To: Rate_Determining_Step
It is entirely acceptable and non-contradictary to be a mystical, anti-reason, altruistic, collectivist dope smoker and still be a Libertarian. Not if the non-aggression principle (the cornerstone of libertarian political advocacy) is followed to it's logical conclusion.
Are there non-thinking dolts who call themselves "libertarian" because they think it sounds cool, without ever having bothered to find out what it is?
Sure.
Are there pointy-headed pseudo-intellectuals who stretch objectivism into all sorts of contortions to make it fit their worldview (making it essentially useless)?
Absolutely.
But that isn't an indictement of either libertarianism or objectivism. It's an indictment of dolts and pointy-headed pseudo-intellectuals.
45
posted on
04/15/2003 4:22:22 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: RJCogburn
...the only actions that should be forbidden by law are those that involve the initiation of force against those who have not themselves used force...:)
Yes, it's a romantic, idealistic dream, which assumes people will act in a principled way, when left to their own devices. But maybe should all strive for a little more romance and ideals, in our politics?
46
posted on
04/15/2003 4:38:10 AM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: OWK
Hey, OWK! Great to see you back on FR, mate.
47
posted on
04/15/2003 4:39:17 AM PDT
by
Byron_the_Aussie
(http://www.theinterviewwithgod.com/popup2.html)
To: OWK
>> It is entirely acceptable and non-contradictary to be a mystical, anti-reason, altruistic, collectivist dope smoker and still be a Libertarian.
>> Not if the non-aggression principle (the cornerstone of libertarian political advocacy) is followed to it's logical conclusion.
OK, pull "collectivist" and I'm accurate.
You entirely bypass my point that Libertarianism is a >political party<. NOT a philosophy. Not even close.
48
posted on
04/16/2003 11:24:57 AM PDT
by
Rate_Determining_Step
(The US Military! Draining the Swam of Terrorism since 2001)
To: Rate_Determining_Step
You entirely bypass my point that Libertarianism is a >political party<. NOT a philosophy. Not even close. It is a political party which is supposed to be predicated on the non-aggression principle.
49
posted on
04/16/2003 4:32:53 PM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
> It is a political party which is supposed to be predicated on the non-aggression principle.
Big whoop. Not enough.
50
posted on
04/16/2003 8:38:14 PM PDT
by
Rate_Determining_Step
(The US Military! Draining the Swam of Terrorism since 2001)
To: OWK
You're an admitted anarchist. You have no crediblity.
To: OWK
You are liberal ...
if you think you can defy -- change -- deny ---
the * LAWS * of REALITY (( science // responsibilities // consequences )) !
Most people are ... liberatarians -- anarchists (( dreamers // anarchists )) ...
lot's --- * criminals * (( psychos )) too !
You just can't make it up --- to suit yourself --- as you like it !
52
posted on
04/16/2003 8:48:33 PM PDT
by
f.Christian
(( Evolution is whatever lie you want it to be. ))
To: f.Christian
Most people are ... liberatarians -- anarchists (( dreamers // idealists )) ... reality repelled !
53
posted on
04/16/2003 8:50:01 PM PDT
by
f.Christian
(( Evolution is whatever lie you want it to be. ))
To: RJCogburn
Your comments are in poor form, IMO, adding nothing of substance.LOL! It's all he does!
To: Kevin Curry
Anarchists are one reason I'll never give up my guns.
To: Rate_Determining_Step
Anarchists are one reason I'll never give up my guns. Statists with guns, is the reason I self-identify as a rational anarchist.
56
posted on
04/17/2003 7:46:03 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: f.Christian
You are liberal ... if you think you can defy -- change -- deny --- the * LAWS * of REALITY (( science // responsibilities // consequences )) ! Most people are ... liberatarians -- anarchists (( dreamers // anarchists )) ... lot's --- * criminals * (( psychos )) too ! You just can't make it up --- to suit yourself --- as you like it !
57
posted on
04/17/2003 7:49:12 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Kevin Curry
You're an admitted anarchist. You have no crediblity. Wow... credibility with Kevin Curry.
How will I ever live without such a precious commodity?
58
posted on
04/17/2003 7:50:28 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: Rate_Determining_Step
Big whoop. Not enough. That was supposed to be an answer?
I'm underwhelmed.
59
posted on
04/17/2003 7:51:21 AM PDT
by
OWK
To: OWK
I'm an objectivist libertarian.
(who thinks that both libertarians and objectivists ignore the obvious conclusions to be drawn from the respective philosophies.)
What are the respective philosophies? I know Objectivism is a philosophy. As far as I've always thought and know is that libertarian is a political platform, not a philosophy. What is the other philosophy you make reference to.
60
posted on
04/17/2003 8:55:04 AM PDT
by
Zon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson