Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Women Ran the World?
BusinessWeek ^ | Tue Apr 15, 2003 | Thane Peterson

Posted on 04/15/2003 12:23:32 PM PDT by WaveThatFlag

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: WaveThatFlag
Prime Minister Claire of Canada: Helen, why did you nuke Toronto?!?

President Helen of the U.S.: Oh, you know why!

21 posted on 04/15/2003 12:33:28 PM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Wouldn't we be a lot better off if women were in charge

They are, though, aren't they.

22 posted on 04/15/2003 12:34:33 PM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
ROFL....some of these comments are soooooo right on...
23 posted on 04/15/2003 12:34:37 PM PDT by goodnesswins (CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Women do run the world, and all that violence is just men trying to make the payments on all the stuff they buy for women.

Without women, men would be happy to sit around watching TV or typing at the computer.

24 posted on 04/15/2003 12:35:01 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag

We would still have to kill those spiders!


25 posted on 04/15/2003 12:35:02 PM PDT by John123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Would U.S. troops be in Iraq today if, say, Hillary Clinton (news - web sites) were President, and not George W. Bush?

Why doesn't the author ask "What if a woman had been in charge of Iraq instead of Saddam?"
26 posted on 04/15/2003 12:35:33 PM PDT by Honcho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smadurski
I have a woman in my life. She rules my world.
27 posted on 04/15/2003 12:35:58 PM PDT by Baseballguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Women hold 45.3% of the seats in Parliament in Sweden,

I wonder if any of them are looking for an intern?

28 posted on 04/15/2003 12:36:14 PM PDT by putupon (I smack Chirac and Garofalo too w/ my shoe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
You're 100% right.

Also, women in general are far more emotional than men. Making big, national, or global decisions based upon emotion is not very smart. Unfortunately, I think most women leaders, particularly the liberal variety, would make decisions based on feelings, not thought.

29 posted on 04/15/2003 12:36:26 PM PDT by Luna (Evil will not triumph...God is at the helm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Doesn't matter the gender. Whoever is not prepared to defend their lives and freedoms with the ulimate force will soon be enslaved by those more willing to do so.
30 posted on 04/15/2003 12:36:36 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
If women (like me) ran the world, it would be possible to open a beer without breaking a nail.
If women (like me) ran the world, beerguts and big butts on women would be "sexy". Skinny girls would be paying $$ for silicone gut and rear/thigh implants.
31 posted on 04/15/2003 12:36:45 PM PDT by hispanarepublicana (successful, educated unauthentic latina--in Patrick Leahy's eyes, at least)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honcho
We could've saved lots of bombs and money, and just sent Hillary to Saddam....that would've scared him sh*tless, and he and his spawn would've run for cover forever! (And, we could've made her STAY there!!!)
32 posted on 04/15/2003 12:37:16 PM PDT by goodnesswins (CNN...the MOST TRUSTED in News......by CRIMINALS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag; Illbay
I only have a niggling thought that there may not be the same kind of enjoyment of aggression that I see on the playground with my son and his friends. I'm convinced that boys and girls are different.

It depends on what the meaning of "aggression" is. If it means upfront, toe-to-toe confrontation, men are more aggressive; if it means sneaking, whining, lying, and truly deep-seated hatred and cruelty, women take the prize.

I wish I remembered who said, "Given the same opportunities, women will make exactly the same mistakes as men."

33 posted on 04/15/2003 12:37:23 PM PDT by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the CORRUPT liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
I see. When women wage war, it's to be called 'intervention'. It's all in the euphemisms, apparently.
34 posted on 04/15/2003 12:37:27 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Remember the Texas cheerleader mom who tried to murder another mom so her daughter would be too grief-stricken to make the team and the perp's daughter would then be chosen? Yeah, I want her to be Secretary of Defense. She's got the Pre-emptive Strike idea down pretty well.
35 posted on 04/15/2003 12:37:51 PM PDT by Anamensis (New axis of evil: Syria, Iran, Hollywood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
BusinessWeek is a lib rag. Dont let the name fool you. The editors of Bizweek are more 'hall monitors' than fans of business. They will find a lib-friendly angle to almost any article.

The only Biz Mag that is a real fan of Capitalism is Forbes. I cant live without it.

36 posted on 04/15/2003 12:38:11 PM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Most single women vote for a subsitute husband/father-state, which is why socialism is creeping up on us.

Until they can run their own lives, they have no business running anything (as a group).

And yes, I am female, so spare me.
37 posted on 04/15/2003 12:39:12 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Well, anyone not invited to a special, closed door meeting would know that everyone in there was talking about her. There'd be all kinds of gossip about other world leaders whispered "off the record" of course, which would then end up as the headline the following day. Backstabbing would be even more common than it is now (can you say France?). Outfits would be ridiculed as "so yesterday, what was she thinking?". I could go on and on.

btw, I'm a woman, so I can say all that.

38 posted on 04/15/2003 12:39:54 PM PDT by reformed_dem (For office use only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamensis; All
men run the world. women run the men. yeah, you forgot the barf alert.
39 posted on 04/15/2003 12:40:11 PM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
When women gain excessive influence, their relatively static approach opens society up to exploitation and control by external forces. Look at France.
40 posted on 04/15/2003 12:40:38 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson