Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Women Ran the World?
BusinessWeek ^ | Tue Apr 15, 2003 | Thane Peterson

Posted on 04/15/2003 12:23:32 PM PDT by WaveThatFlag

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: WaveThatFlag
uh oh,

Isa 3:12
12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths. (KJV)

41 posted on 04/15/2003 12:40:58 PM PDT by the-ironically-named-proverbs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
... and missiles would no longer be aerodynamic. LOL!
42 posted on 04/15/2003 12:41:54 PM PDT by Anamensis (New axis of evil: Syria, Iran, Hollywood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
Alpha Male Alert!
43 posted on 04/15/2003 12:42:20 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hispanarepublicana
Does this legislation make my butt look big?
44 posted on 04/15/2003 12:42:38 PM PDT by keithtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Ready to Donate NOW?

You Know The Drill!

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD



45 posted on 04/15/2003 12:42:44 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Women... pfft. Look at Golda Meir (curse be upon her moustache). She let the Arabs build up an attack force and then she let them launch a surprise attack--beause she thought pre-empting them like in 1967 would have looked bad for Israel politically! Women leaders... I would need to see a woman like Condoleezza Rice or Margaret Thatcher before I considered voting for one of them. Their track record in running world governments is no better than men's.
46 posted on 04/15/2003 12:43:19 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honcho
Yeah, women are all sugar and spice and everything nice...


Mrs. Anthrax


Dr. Germ

47 posted on 04/15/2003 12:44:22 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Q: What if woman ran the world?

A: Nuclear war every month.

48 posted on 04/15/2003 12:44:28 PM PDT by Hacksaw (New LP Award : The Pablo Escobar Medal of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anamensis
If women ran the world, instead of a war every 20 years, there'd be a war every month.

I see was beaten to this several times.

49 posted on 04/15/2003 12:45:31 PM PDT by Hacksaw (New LP Award : The Pablo Escobar Medal of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
If women ran the world we'd be in a hell worse than dealing with the french. Women are reactionary based on emotion. That's how we ended up with a Clinton as potus. He was cute. Now apply that to foreign policy and imagine the disaster.
50 posted on 04/15/2003 12:45:49 PM PDT by Havoc (If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
Depends upon who's running the country. Hitlery Clintoon or Puce Pube Pelosi--have real problems. Give me a Margaret Thatcher or a Golda Meir and I'll vote for her. In the western world, many women hold prestigious offices. However, that can't be said of the islamic world. Now think about improvements in the islamic world made by women. What would muslim countries be like if a woman were the head? There would be peace in the middle east!
51 posted on 04/15/2003 12:46:44 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Clinton was CUTE????? I don't know ANY woman who thought that. I never did get that whole thing.
52 posted on 04/15/2003 12:47:00 PM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Become a Monthly Donor to Free Republic. Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
True. There's no such thing as 'cute' foreign policy, no matter what women may want to believe.
53 posted on 04/15/2003 12:48:33 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
But in my experience, women tend to pursue conciliation and cooperation long after men would have been at each other's throats.

Um...has this author ever been to high school or college and seen groups of girls/women? Hell, has he ever seen two girls actually FIGHT? If you want to see a dirty, nasty, cheating fight, watch a couple of high school girls go at it.

And that's not even considering the protective streak that most women have about their kids. Remember, "the most dangerous place in the world is between a mother and her children"!

}:-)4

54 posted on 04/15/2003 12:49:57 PM PDT by Moose4 (Mew havoc, and let loose the kittens of ZOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag
No you forgot. Women and men ARE exactly the same. Except that women are better than men at some things.
55 posted on 04/15/2003 12:50:38 PM PDT by WaveThatFlag (Run Al, Run!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties
I think, all in all, women will tend to let the core situations deteriorate much more, hoping quick fixes will resolve issues, and then the ultimate result is likely to be much more detrimental to whichever society has put its trust primarily in women leaders.
56 posted on 04/15/2003 12:50:52 PM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
I just bought a metal combat baton. Gonna take up figure skating.

This stuff is too silly to bother with commenting at length. Suffice it to say that the author takes a particularly creaky and evidenceless social premise, postulates an entire world running strictly under its conditions, and speculates that it would all come out like he imagines. He should stick to writing romance novels.

57 posted on 04/15/2003 12:51:02 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
"Let the American infidels bask in their illusion"
Mohammed Saeed Sahhaf

58 posted on 04/15/2003 12:52:15 PM PDT by COURAGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Among the more savage societies in the history of the world, such as the Plains Indians of North America, the men do the fighting, then bring the captives--men, women and children--back to camp.

The women are in charge of the hideous and neverending torture of the captives.

No doubt they turn off the TV and talk them to death.

59 posted on 04/15/2003 12:53:42 PM PDT by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WaveThatFlag
On the one hand, women will be more inclined to peace. Presumably when they've retired from being more vicious guerilla fighters than men. Yeah, that's consistent.
60 posted on 04/15/2003 12:54:35 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson