Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Ambassador: U.S. Bribed Generals to Surrender
Wednesday, April 16, 2003 ^ | NewsMax Wires

Posted on 04/15/2003 7:30:19 PM PDT by Nachum

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: jlogajan
Well, there are certainly some of the old guard in Russia trying to CYA

These Russians are just pissed that they didn't hold out for some loose change before their empire folded like a cheap tent.

41 posted on 04/15/2003 8:43:23 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Soddom has left the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Bump!
42 posted on 04/15/2003 8:46:31 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
" if Russian had any extra money to throw around, things might have turned out differently in Chechnya. "

I have a feeling that the Russian tendency to carpet bomb indiscriminately war a part of their problem. The russians would see a group of rebels in a village hiding and then proceed to level the entire village. This would turn the local populace against them.
43 posted on 04/15/2003 8:49:06 PM PDT by jbstrick (Behold the Power of CHEESE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
Yes, the ubiquitous Col. Hunt said on it O'Reilly and I heard the same story a few hours later by John Loftus on Bachelor & Alexander's radio show in NY. That the original source is a Russian general was not noted by either. Don't know why either would promulgate this story if that was the only source. Still, if true, I don't like it, even if, very theoretically it might have "saved lives". If it is true, and we have to admit it, it's gonna provide a much-needed boost to the waning anti-war crowd.
44 posted on 04/15/2003 8:59:20 PM PDT by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
....And this is supposed to be a bad thing?

Yeah I guess the Russian way is to slug it out with maximum infantry casualties. If this is true think of how many young American men are going home to their families who would otherwise not. Brilliant (if true, and I doubt it...more likely the Generals surrendered when they soiled all their "Depends" from U.S. bombs and ran out of them)

45 posted on 04/15/2003 9:04:12 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
No it isn't a bad idea. This article wants to minimize Americas war making machine (SHOCK & AWE)
46 posted on 04/15/2003 9:33:04 PM PDT by delightfully dingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
So we bribed them to give up. So what? Does this mean we would have lost had they chosen to fight? No, it means many more of them would have died. That's why they chose the money, because it was better than dying.
47 posted on 04/15/2003 9:36:19 PM PDT by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
I thought we were bogged in a guagmire...

I keep waiting for this operational pause to be over. It was supposed to be 45 days, so I guess we've still got a month to go.

48 posted on 04/15/2003 9:43:12 PM PDT by laz17 (Socialism is the religion of the atheist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Reply to post #8: I believe you mean Sun tzu.
49 posted on 04/15/2003 10:04:42 PM PDT by A6M3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
That's a cheap $100 million expense.
50 posted on 04/15/2003 10:16:38 PM PDT by WOSG (All Hail The Free Republic of Iraq! God Bless our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
How dare us corrupt those incorruptable bloodthirsty killers.... why who has heard of such a thing in the middle east.... what will this do to the ..."Community"?
51 posted on 04/15/2003 10:20:22 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Since the Iraqi army was a clone of the Russina (soviet) era military and equipted with similar weapons, this seems more like damage control. If you are any nation in the world whose weapons do you want to buy in order to defend youself? Obviously, the russian products and tactics have not proven themselves on the battlefield.
52 posted on 04/15/2003 10:32:29 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson