Skip to comments.
Shuttle Doomed at Takeoff (Astronauts doomed from the start)
abc news ^
| 4/18/2003
| Lisa Stark and Gina Treadgold
Posted on 04/18/2003 6:01:28 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: _Jim
"It sounds like a bunch of sensor data was processed in a very basic form and simply 'laid onto magnetic tape' -"
This craft was instrumented with a lot more sensors than the others because these were embedded at build time for performance analysis on the early vehicles.
Most of this extra sensors and the wires to support them were torn out (saveing 7000 bounds (or was it kilos) of vehicle weight.
According to nasa, only those few sensors that were hard to get to were left in place. (This per one of the televised briefings a month ago).
Im speculating thats where these measurements came from.
41
posted on
04/18/2003 11:24:02 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: BlackBirdII
"Incredibly stupid comment IMHO. The decision to abort would only be made if an obvious catastrophic event was taking place, as an abort is serious sh_t in itself. "
Serious ?
Financially maybe, but abort to Rota is PLANNED in every mission. Its practiced in the simulator time and time again.
The largest consequence (other than the loss of the mission) is the cost of flying the shuttle back across the Atlantic on the 747.
42
posted on
04/18/2003 11:28:16 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: Razzz
There are countless things we've gotten from the space program once a process or experiment or a device was, by the companies they contracted, developed for commercial use. Like mircowave ovens.
Would that stuff have been invented on it's own? Probably. But the innovation was sparked by working on the space program.
And NASA's budget is nothing compared to the vast waste of money on some worthless and proven unworkable gov't programs.
Regardless, we are explorers and we always will be.
43
posted on
04/18/2003 11:39:47 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(Iraq - Free At Last!)
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: bellevuesbest
They chose not to send up another orbiter after them. They knew they could have and chose not to.
And yes, shuttle launches have been scrapped due to woodpecker damage. They have been rolled back to the assembly building for it from the pad.
"NOTE: Workers at Launch Pad 39-B are preparing the Shuttle Discovery
for rollback to the Vehicle Assembly Building beginning at 3:30 a.m.
Thursday. The decision to go back to the VAB was made in order to
repair damage done by woodpeckers in the foam insulation of the
external tank. It is estimated that about six days will be needed to
repair the woodpecker holes once access is gained to the external
tank in the VAB."
To: twntaipan
they died because of NASA and their problems!
46
posted on
04/19/2003 6:45:58 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth.....)
To: leadpenny
ping
47
posted on
04/19/2003 7:27:44 AM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
(The gift is to see the truth.....)
To: konaice
The article implies the data was recorded and was never engineered or intended to be transmistted.
48
posted on
04/19/2003 9:39:29 AM PDT
by
ironman
To: TLBSHOW
Thanks for the heads-up. What is your best WAG or SWAG for a date that we may see another shuttle launch? If ever?
49
posted on
04/20/2003 3:39:39 AM PDT
by
leadpenny
(OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson