Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Islamist power play
TownHall.com ^ | Tuesday, April 22, 2003 | by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.

Posted on 04/21/2003 10:09:40 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

President Bush recently nominated a distinguished scholar to serve on the board of the U.S. Institute of Peace. Ordinarily, such a step would not engender much notice, let alone controversy.

The President’s selection of Dr. Daniel Pipes to serve in that capacity was immediately noteworthy, however, insofar as it appeared to signal that the Bush White House was sensitive after all to an important distinction: Not all Muslims are Islamists -- members of virulently anti-Western, intolerant and often violent extremist sects -- but all Islamists profess to be Muslims. Dr. Pipes has devoted much of his highly prolific career in academia and as an author to highlighting the danger posed to the United States, her allies and interests and to non-Islamist Muslims by the radicals who seek to hijack and dominate the Islamic faith.

With the Pipes appointment, the Bush team seemed to be trying to redress an earlier and potentially strategically disastrous error -- namely, treating groups associated with, funded by or otherwise supportive of Islamist causes and organizations as "mainstream" Muslim entities. By so doing, the latter were repeatedly afforded access to the President and other senior Administration officials and aided in their efforts to lay otherwise-unwarranted claim to leadership of the American Muslim and Arab communities.

This was all the more remarkable since groups like the American Muslim Council (AMC), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America and the Muslim Students Association have, to varying degrees, been quite outspoken in their opposition to many of the President’s domestic and foreign policies in the war on terror.

For example, pro-Islamist groups have strenuously opposed Mr. Bush’s liberation of Iraq, playing leading roles in the anti-war movement’s mass demonstrations and organizational activities. Their agenda has lately been preoccupied with denouncing and undermining any Bush law-enforcement and homeland security initiatives they can portray as unfair to Muslims. They deny compelling evidence contained in a 50-count indictment against one of their most prominent spokesmen, Professor Sami Al-Arian, that he and a number of his associates were directly involved in and/or supportive of Palestinian Islamic Jihad's international terrorist activities. Some are even suing the President, Attorney General John Ashcroft and others to block some of the Administration’s efforts to protect the American people from further Islamist attacks.

Surprisingly, a White House not exactly renowned for tolerating perceived disloyalty has, to date, not penalized those who have engaged in such activities. Many continue to be afforded the opportunity to meet with Administration officials and, in turn, to cite such meetings in press releases and public statements as evidence that they must not be Islamist-sympathizers, after all.

Thus emboldened, the AMC, CAIR and other organizations like the Islamic Institute have launched a jihad against President Bush’s nomination of Daniel Pipes to the U.S. Institute of Peace board. Pipes’ opponents are demanding that the appointment be withdrawn and urging the Senate to reject it if the President does not do their bidding.

Unfortunately for the pro-Islamists, the more they attack Dr. Pipes, the greater the likelihood that their true nature will be illuminated. It is not he who is demeaning all Muslims by pretending there is no distinction between those law-abiding, patriotic, tolerant Americans who adhere to Islam and those who are none of the above, and who want to destroy this country and the freedoms it affords all religions.

Dr. Pipes’ calls for greater scrutiny of the latter who may be masquerading as the former -- notably in the context of the recent alleged fragging of the 101st Airborne leadership in Kuwait by a Muslim sergeant named Hasan Akbar -- is not evidence of racism or bigotry. Most of us recognize that it is, rather, simple prudence in light of the now-indisputable determination of Islamists to shed American blood.

The effort to smear Daniel Pipes and to derail his nomination is overreaching by the pro-Islamist groups. Heretofore, their largely behind-the-scenes pressure campaigns have induced the Clinton and/or Bush administrations to allow them to: place extremist Wahhabi or like-minded clerics to proselytize in the U.S. and state prison systems; certify Islamists as chaplains for the military; and even conduct "sensitivity training" for the FBI With this open assault on the President’s nominee, however, the wisdom of these decisions -- to say nothing of that of making such organizations the favored interlocutors with the American Muslim community -- can no longer escape critical public examination.

President Bush is to be commended for recognizing the valuable contribution Dr. Pipes can make to understanding the threats to peace we will confront in the 21st Century. By rebuffing demands that he abandon this nomination and by securing its approval in the Senate, Mr. Bush can reinforce the powerful message the Pipes’ appointment sends to Muslims and non-Muslims, alike: This Administration will resist -- here at home, as elsewhere around the world -- those who seek to pervert and dominate the Islamic faith towards radical, intolerant and anti-American ends.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: frankjgaffney; frankjgaffneyjr; jr
Tuesday, April 22, 2003

Quote of the Day by Texas Eagle

1 posted on 04/21/2003 10:09:40 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz; Sabertooth
ping
2 posted on 04/21/2003 10:14:05 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
If the President can't get Estrada or Owen confirmed, what do his nominations mean anyway?
3 posted on 04/21/2003 10:16:04 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Surprisingly, a White House not exactly renowned for tolerating perceived disloyalty has, to date, not penalized those who have engaged in such activities. Many continue to be afforded the opportunity to meet with Administration officials and, in turn, to cite such meetings in press releases and public statements as evidence that they must not be Islamist-sympathizers, after all.

bump
4 posted on 04/21/2003 10:17:15 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"If the President can't get Estrada or Owen confirmed, what do his nominations mean anyway?"

More to the point, if this kind of thing continues, what will become of the federal bench? Either the Republicans will permit the democrats to fill it with liberals only or they will do the same thing to the democrats that's being done to them. Either way, the federal judiciary is toast.

5 posted on 04/21/2003 11:37:40 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
ping
6 posted on 04/22/2003 7:15:58 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte; TLBSHOW
Recess appointments are the obvious stopgap solution to the DemocRATs' obstructionism. The Congress is now in recess.
7 posted on 04/22/2003 7:45:14 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte; TLBSHOW
Recess appointments are the obvious stopgap solution to the DemocRATs' obstructionism. The Congress is now in recess.
8 posted on 04/22/2003 7:45:14 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Free Daniel Pipes!

And while we're at it, free Miguel Estrada and Priscilla Owen too!
9 posted on 04/22/2003 7:47:20 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
When is a confirmation hearing / vote scheduled on Pipes?
10 posted on 04/22/2003 7:49:10 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
This is day 7 of the work week and still no recess appointments for anyone.

I really think that Bush dos not want any of those he puts up to be confirmed by his lack of speaking up for them. He just throws bones to conservatives that he knows will go nowhere...

But when Trent was under fire what did he do he slams Trent and sides with the democrats... kinda liberal like don't you think?
11 posted on 04/22/2003 7:51:36 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (The gift is to see the truth.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
"Recess appointments are the obvious stopgap solution..."

Personally, I have no interest in stopgaps. I favor total denial of all pork to democrat constituents, extending even to court mandated return of previous pork. In addition, I would suggest a massive and extemely aggressive DOJ pursuit of any and all democrat miscreants, concentrating on major campaign contributors and party wheels. Lots of high profile trials, serious prison terms, crushing fines. All of it absolutely unrelenting. Drive them to the wall and then push them through it. No mercy. Annihilate them.

12 posted on 04/22/2003 11:00:29 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Your suggesting all play by the same fair rules.
Of course you are correct, but the Democrats will go as long as they can with breaking the law or getting the dead to vote. Anything to further a politics whose agenda can't stand in the light of day and get voted in.

You are in essence talking about the Republicans getting some real guts and persistence in handling this. If these weren't career politicians, that would be easier.

People always vote their wallets, whether the electorate or the elected!
13 posted on 04/22/2003 11:16:48 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
bttt
14 posted on 04/22/2003 1:01:57 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I can dream, can't I? If I had the clout, which I don't, I would give Republicans an offer they can't refuse. Nothing to lose, since the way they are now going will hand the entire federal judiciary over to the left -- a move that will make the Republicans extinct anyway.
15 posted on 04/22/2003 2:00:46 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
The lack of Republican guts can ruin this country because while they have the nuts of a gerbil, the Democrats have bowling balls the size of an elephant while pushing communism.
Makes you want to shake some sense into these useless near-empty suits.
16 posted on 04/22/2003 7:03:09 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
I just had an idea for all Republican campaigns in 2004.
How about we have commercials in all 2004 races where the a picture of the local Democrat is on the TV screen and various voters spend a minute just hitting the picture the bottom of their shoes in their hand...
Works for me!
17 posted on 04/22/2003 10:40:07 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson