Skip to comments.
Bush bypasses Congress with 11 recess appointments
sfgate.com ^
| Tuesday, April 22, 2003
Posted on 04/22/2003 4:10:57 PM PDT by livesbygrace
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:20 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
President Bush bypassed Congress on Tuesday and installed 11 people whose nominations had languished for as long as 16 months.
All the so-called recess appointments were to little-known boards. By signing the appointments during the congressional recess, Bush bypassed the Senate confirmation process. Such appointments are valid until the next Congress takes office, in this case in January 2005.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: appointments; bush; congress
I got excited... I thought these were judicial at first...
To: livesbygrace
Darn.
2
posted on
04/22/2003 4:13:17 PM PDT
by
gitmo
("The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain." GWB)
To: livesbygrace
One can only hope.
3
posted on
04/22/2003 4:13:18 PM PDT
by
Inkie
To: livesbygrace
This is the same as Don Rumsfeld saying something is "not helpful!" Let's see if the Senate understand the message.
To: livesbygrace
Regarding the use of recess appointments for judicial nominees. President Bush should use such appointments for all nominees who are being filibustered. He should make a public statement that each nominee was voted out of committee and if the full Senate voted would be confirmed; that the filibuster by a minority of Democrats is thwarting the advice and consent mandate in Art. II, Sec. 2 of the Constitution, that, if carried to the extreme that some Democrats have advocated, their obstructionist tactics could result in a denial to the people of their constitutionally granted right to an effective Federal judiciary, that, therefore, he will continue to re-appoint these judges at each recess (i.e., use serial recess appointments) for so long as he is President to assure that there is an effective Federal judiciary as envisioned by the Constitution.
5
posted on
04/22/2003 4:40:07 PM PDT
by
Pharlap
To: livesbygrace
Any day now, Frist will whip the senate into action, just wait....
6
posted on
04/22/2003 4:41:56 PM PDT
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
Why can't he just make recess appointments for the judiciary, since they are good until the next Congress? We have a chance of getting a filibuster proof majority, don't we? Dems have a lot more seats up for re-election than pubbies, and I know there are an awful lot of unhappy democrat voters.
To: livesbygrace
Go, Bush, go! Now aim for those judicial appointments.
To: SubMareener
I agree...I think this is George W. Bush putting the Senate on notice.
9
posted on
04/22/2003 5:18:18 PM PDT
by
mtnwmn
To: livesbygrace
Just testing the waters, just testing the waters. You gotta love the way Bush just ever so slightly tweaks the RATs. He was doing this before 9/11 (which some people seemed to have forgotten).
10
posted on
04/22/2003 5:20:08 PM PDT
by
CatOwner
To: livesbygrace
Sending a message. The left will misunderestimate President Bush again. Watch and see.
To: SubMareener
This is the same as Don Rumsfeld saying something is "not helpful!" Let's see if the Senate understand the message.
Exactly!
To: livesbygrace
* Naomi Churchill Earp of Virginia to be a member of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as vice chairman. Bush nominated Earp on Nov. 27, 2001, and again on Jan. 9, 2003. If a woman MUST carry two names, Churchill and Earp are good ones! And, oh yeah, Please Mr. President, make JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS NOW!!!)
To: livesbygrace
Shot across the bow?
14
posted on
04/22/2003 5:44:11 PM PDT
by
mombonn
To: livesbygrace
Me too and why weren't they judicial appointments?
15
posted on
04/22/2003 5:47:10 PM PDT
by
Brian S
(OLLIE OLLIE OXEN FREE!!!)
To: Pharlap
Regarding the use of recess appointments for judicial nominees. President Bush should use such appointments for all nominees who are being filibustered. No. He should recess-appoint the most thoroughly right-wing people he can find, judges that would be the Dem's worst nightmares. Then tell the Dems "You don't like my recess appointments? Well, approve the ones I sent you!"
16
posted on
04/22/2003 5:48:33 PM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(Heavily armed, easily bored, and off my medication)
To: SauronOfMordor
I volunteer!
To: savedbygrace
Rush was talking about that today, and said USA Today had an article on the net about how the left has "misunderestimated" Bush and how the left continues to do so - and how the left will still continue to do so - to it's terrible detriment in 2004.
18
posted on
04/22/2003 5:55:52 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: CyberAnt
Interesting. I don't generally listen to Rush (didn't today either) and I never read USA Today, unless I'm traveling and the hotel puts one in front of my room door.
To: livesbygrace
Yawn.
Most of these stupid boards and commissions ought to be completely red-penciled out of existence, not refilled with time-serving parasites. Where's that smaller government, George? Do something brave, something that enhances liberty and shrinks Big Stupid Government, even a little bit.
Federal Mine Health and Safety Review Commission?
Legal Services Corp.?
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?
Merit Systems Protection Board?
Corporation for National and Community Service?
Export-Import Bank of the United States?
What is all this unconstitutional crap?
20
posted on
04/22/2003 6:07:58 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson