Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: Why I nearly resigned
The Spectator (U.K.) ^
| 04/26/03
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 04/24/2003 6:44:07 AM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: Pokey78
Steyn takes on the UN.
It's not a fair fight!
21
posted on
04/24/2003 8:13:55 AM PDT
by
Gritty
To: Pokey78
bttt for later STEYN read ! . . .
22
posted on
04/24/2003 8:16:18 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
To: Pokey78
Thanks for the ping.
Steyn is the best. Period.
23
posted on
04/24/2003 8:20:30 AM PDT
by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Pokey78
The man is a treasure.
24
posted on
04/24/2003 8:23:01 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: Thud
FYI
To: notorious vrc
I wish that Steyn could shorten his columns just a bit.HERESY!!!!!
I savor every Steynian statement.
To: M. Thatcher
LOL. Including the words I have to look up!
27
posted on
04/24/2003 8:29:35 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: notorious vrc
I wish that Steyn could shorten his columns just a bit.Heresy!
To: Pokey78; JohnHuang2
<< ..... the heart sinks at finding a paragraph like that in what purports to be a conservative magazine. >>
The heart should not so sink, though, for all they have used, misused, abused, politicised and even Capitalized the word "Conservative" in once great Britain, there never has been, is not now and never will be a Consevative -- in the American sense of what that means -- in that once-fair land.
The British mind set is such that even those who call themselves Capital "C" Conservatives differ from the rest of Britain's sorry socialist shower only in the ways in which they offer to cut up and squander the confiscated wealth of Britain's most creative, innovative, productive and industrious SUBJECTS.
The Brits, that is -- poor fools they! -- who are not already called AMERICANS!
29
posted on
04/24/2003 8:35:38 AM PDT
by
Brian Allen
( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
To: M. Thatcher
Hmmm. What's that old saw about Great Minds?! LOL
To: Pokey78
Excellent column.
31
posted on
04/24/2003 8:36:18 AM PDT
by
Sloth
("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
To: Pokey78
Nobody consistently gets it right as often as Steyn. "Or as I like to call it, the Belgian Congo." Even his insults make valid points.
32
posted on
04/24/2003 8:41:24 AM PDT
by
XJarhead
To: Pokey78
It quickly emerged that no other British publication would have me, and the only alternative employment was casual construction work. I can see several American news outlets that would jump at the chance to acquire Mark Steyn.
33
posted on
04/24/2003 8:42:36 AM PDT
by
Hostage
To: Pokey78
Steyn bump. It is notable that those countries most interested in transferring control of Iraq to the UN are the very ones most interested in plundering the place, and who have active track records of doing precisely that. But not to accede to their demands would place the U.S. in dire peril of international public opprobrium. They might say nasty things about us and hate us.
Which represents a change from the present situation...precisely how?
To: Pokey78
Once again, Steyn pierces the jugular.
It's noteworthy that, whereas most American liberals ask to be judged on their intentions and excused for their failures, Postmodern Transnationalists, the sole remaining human subspecies that considers the UN a really neat idea:
- demand to be judged on their allegiance to a gaggle of despots, without reference to what those despots actually do to their subjects;
- refuse to consider previous successes and failures as relevant to a policy decision, and consider it rude to raise the subject;
- condemn anyone who dares to assert that there might be some source of moral authority more reliable and less transient than the opinion of the "world community," in whose name they claim the monopoly privilege to speak.
UN Delenda Est.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason:
http://palaceofreason.com
35
posted on
04/24/2003 9:11:41 AM PDT
by
fporretto
(Curmudgeon Emeritus, Palace of Reason)
To: Pokey78
Mark Steyn goes after his own editors. Wow.
Why isn't he on Fox News?
36
posted on
04/24/2003 9:39:24 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: katana
Twain's equal? I see Mark as being the best of HL Mencken and PJ O'Rourke. To compare him to Twain would be difficult unless it were to say that Steyn is the Twain of our century.
37
posted on
04/24/2003 9:42:32 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: Pokey78
Steyn is awesome..............as usual.
To: fporretto; MadIvan
The Spectator is not motivated by anti-American animus, of course, and, unlike certain anti-war contributors to these pages, it was not on Saddams payroll. Who's he talking about???
39
posted on
04/24/2003 11:12:49 AM PDT
by
Shermy
(Full disclosure of Food For Oil books...No Compromise!!!)
To: Pokey78
While the lefties warned that Ariel Sharon would use the cover of the Iraq war to slaughter the Palestinians, the Congolese are being slaughtered, and you dont need any cover. Because nobody cares. Because no Americans or Zionists are involved.The nobodies who don't care are the media...it is their job to inform us...I'd love to see CNN do some investigative reporting on the Belgian Congo and the French action in Sierra Leone...but they never seem to turn a critical eye on anyone but the USA and Israel.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson