Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blair Fears New Cold War Over EU Rift With US
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 4-29-2003 | Toby Helm

Posted on 04/28/2003 7:32:32 PM PDT by blam

Blair fears new Cold War over EU rift with US

By Toby Helm, Chief Political Correspondent
(Filed: 29/04/2003)

Tony Blair issued a warning yesterday that the world would be plunged back into an era of insecurity and tension reminiscent of the Cold War unless Europe and America quickly repaired the transatlantic relationship.

On the eve of talks in Moscow with President Vladimir Putin, who strongly opposed the war in Iraq, Mr Blair said there was a real danger that the advanced world would split into rival power blocs.

"My fear is that if we do not deal with the world on the basis of a partnership between Europe and America, then we will in a sense put back into the world the divisions that we wanted to get rid of when the Cold War finished.

"I think that would be just a disaster for the world."

The Iraq war split the European Union between those countries that backed Washington, led by Britain and Spain, and those that opposed military action, headed by France and Germany.

Mr Blair fears that the bad feeling caused by the war will exacerbate anti-Americanism in Europe, leading to a permanent rift.

Aiming his comments mainly at President Jacques Chirac, he said European leaders were facing a crucial time that would shape the future of global diplomacy. If they saw themselves as competitors to America, the dangers for world security and the global economy would be profound.

"I think it is a fundamental decision as to whether the world breaks into different centres of power that I think would very quickly become rival centres of power, or whether we see our task as trying to construct a partnership with America that others can join," he said.

"If you end up with two rival centres of power, you find a very, very difficult situation."

Mr Blair dismissed suggestions that he was being snubbed by France, Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium, which meet in Brussels today to discuss their vision of European defence.

The four nations are expected to lay out plans for common defence forces that are as independent as possible of Nato.

Mr Blair, who developed the idea of a European defence with M Chirac early in his first term as Prime Minister, rejected suggestions that he was losing control of EU defence planning.

He said Britain would "not accept anything that undermines Nato or conflicts with the basis of European defence we have set out".

In a strong defence of his war aims, Mr Blair cautioned those who had opposed war against "crowing" about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He said there was "no doubt that weapons of mass destruction existed".

He said 1,000 sites in Iraq were being examined but most had not yet been analysed and no announcements would be made until they had.

The Prime Minister said it was clear that before military action began there had been a six-month programme of concealment by the Iraqis. One benefit of this for the allies was that it had made the weapons much more difficult to use during the conflict.

Urging rapprochement with France, he said it remained an "important ally" of Britain.

The two countries were the leading defence nations in Europe, had extensive interests in Africa and shared positions on most leading security and political institutions.

Negotiations on world trade would be one of the most important issues over the next six months, he added.

"Are Europe and America going to fight each other or come to a common position and drive that through?"

Mr Blair said he hoped that today's talks with Mr Putin would mark a turning point in relations between Europe and Washington. "My contacts with other European leaders and President Putin lead me to believe that a better atmosphere is developing."

They will discuss sanctions on Iraq and the role of the United Nations in achieving a stable government there.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blair; cold; coldwar; eu; fears; rift; us; war

1 posted on 04/28/2003 7:32:32 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
What's to fear?

Enough of us learned enough from the Gipper to win it all over again.

STAY THE COURSE BABY!

2 posted on 04/28/2003 7:34:35 PM PDT by inaperfectworld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
France, Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium Remove them from NATO
3 posted on 04/28/2003 7:35:16 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The poodle has some explaining to do.
4 posted on 04/28/2003 7:37:06 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
To Tony-Baby: When you sleep (meet) with Klinton then expect to feel the heat from all sides. Stand Up you weak spine Brit and declare yourself!
5 posted on 04/28/2003 7:44:32 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Oh, please. It is not called "a cold war" if we ignore them...

It's called "dissing" them.


6 posted on 04/28/2003 7:47:24 PM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Tony Blair issued a warning yesterday that the world would be plunged back into an era of insecurity and tension reminiscent of the Cold War unless Europe and America quickly repaired the transatlantic relationship.

Come on Tony, you know better than this.

Just because a rift between Europe and your best friend, the U.S., may not be good for merry old England it is not the makings of anything like another Cold War. Time to wake up and smell the coffee. What you see in the actions of France and to some exent Russia and Germany is mostly just old fashioned jelousy. Add to that their natural fear (soon if not already realized) that their pre-war illegal trade with Iraq will be uncovered and the equally strong fear that they will lose out in the race for post-war Iraqi contracts and trade and you have a formula that gives them no choice but to oppose the U.S.

In their hearts they know we were right to go in. Time heals all wounds. This too will pass.

7 posted on 04/28/2003 7:51:58 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Are we supposed to worry about France? France is only a problem if you trust them to guard your back.
8 posted on 04/28/2003 7:52:03 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
Defence firms call on EU to close gap with America

David Gow
Tuesday April 29, 2003
The Guardian

Europe's three leading defence contractors - BAE Systems, EADS and Thales - yesterday joined forces to demand increased EU military spending to close the technological gap with the US.
The British, French and German groups, responding to the political divisions unleashed by the war in Iraq which underlined America's military superiority, urged greater consolidation of Europe's defence industry in land and naval systems.

In an open letter to EU governments on the eve of today's "old" Europe defence summit in Brussels, their chief executives backed a drive for a European armaments and strategic research agency. They called on governments, especially the Germans, to increase defence spending as the gap between European military procurement, now $40bn (£27.6bn), and that of the US, $125bn and rising, widens.

The chief executives said: "We need to address the gap between the two sides of the Atlantic in order for Europe to be seen as a credible player on the international stage and a reliable partner of the US."

But they courted controversy by demanding "protection" of Europe's defence technological and industrial base in future procurement decisions - on American lines.

Daniel Keohane, defence research fellow at the Centre for European Reform, said: "The European defence industry is facing a crisis, and both it and taxpayers need a more open market."

Hmmmmmm

9 posted on 04/28/2003 7:59:22 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam
France, Germany, Luxembourg and Belgium, which meet in Brussels today to discuss their vision of European defence. The four nations are expected to lay out plans for common defence forces that are as independent as possible of Nato.

France, Germany Luxembourg, and Belgium?

10 posted on 04/28/2003 8:03:36 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
I read this as Blair saying One World Power is better than Bi-polar power. You know, the bi-polar, super-power world that the serial rapists, russia and china (and jr. puppet france) have been spouting the last 6-8 years... but I'm a positive thinker...
11 posted on 04/28/2003 8:07:36 PM PDT by jungleboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Tony Blair: "If you end up with two rival centres of power, you find a very, very difficult situation."

MEMO TO BLAIR:

Face the new reality -- the damage is done. France has broken with NATO, and betrayed both Britain and the U.S., while conspiring with Saddam Hussein and Russia.

Deal with it.

12 posted on 04/28/2003 8:10:05 PM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well with an annual budget of $40 billion to our $125, they'll only have to raise taxes by 50% or eliminate some of the social programs. Wonder which ones they'll eliminate?
13 posted on 04/28/2003 8:11:44 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"No people respond more spontaneously to fair play. If you treat Americans well, they always want to treat you better."

Winston Churchill

Listen to Him Tony

14 posted on 04/28/2003 8:15:08 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Blair is committed to submerge the soveriegnity of Great Britain into the fold of the EU. Our days of having the "Special Relationship" with them are numbered for they will become just another state in the U.S. of Europe. Sad.
15 posted on 04/28/2003 8:21:08 PM PDT by BnBlFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
I agree with you - the days of a free England are numbered. They will sacrifice their nation on the altar of the EU rather soon. Too bad.

They should not expect us to help them should they decide later to get back out. The EU is our future enemy - the vanguard of the Blue Helmets.
16 posted on 04/28/2003 8:27:45 PM PDT by 11B3 (Happiness IS a warm gun. After a long day's use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
Great Churchhill quote.

I disagree with removing those nations from NATO (like they'd go?) A better way is to take our friends with us in a new alliance, and pull our military out of NATO. NATO is affectively NOTHING militarily without the US.

We are holding the ace, lets smack it down on the table. I'd love to see the reaction from Paris and Berlin after we did!

Fortress this.
17 posted on 04/28/2003 8:33:12 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Press Secret; Of 2 million Shiite pilgrims, only 3000 chanted anti Americanisms--source-Islamonline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
"The EU is our future enemy - the vanguard of the Blue Helmets.

Yup. FDR's Commie Alger Hiss wrote the original UN Charter.

Alger Hiss

18 posted on 04/28/2003 8:37:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam
Another Cold War presupposes another USSR. This will be more like the relationship between the US and NK, sort of a reverse cloning, if you will. Rather than giving the cell a prick, we'll just give the pricks a cell.
19 posted on 04/28/2003 10:59:58 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam


           Don't go there, Tony.

20 posted on 04/28/2003 11:07:27 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Give it up, Tony.
21 posted on 04/29/2003 12:51:44 AM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson