Posted on 04/29/2003 6:08:15 AM PDT by Diogenesis
GOTTA FREEP THIS - Operation Accountability
Please help FReep the Commissioner for Patents
and the US Patent and Trademark Office who have not used logic
or accountability and have not followed the authority of the US Constitution.
There are at least two very important reasons why this important.
REASON 1.
At the present time, with the United States at war against terror,
energy measurement, energy generation, and energy storage
-- including alternative methods -- are crucially important to the United States
for both its economy and for its security.
Meanwhile, the US Patent Office under the Commissioner for
Patents Godici has refused to issue alternative energy patent
applications even those for monitoring [or measuring] energy.
Many of these alternative energy patent applications involve quite serious inventions
most developed in the United States, and many even confirmed by the
US Navy and other respectable (and impeccable) agencies.
But for more than a decade these inventions which could have helped the
USA before and after the 911 Atrocities have been methodically and systematically
opposed by the Commissioner for Patents and his egregious agents
who defy the controlling authority of the United States Constitution
and Congress which has spoken to "encourage progress" [Diamond v. Chakrabarty]
and to encourage ingenuity [447 U.S. 303, 309] and has defined
patentable statutory subject matter to include
"anything under the sun that is made by man"
[S. Rep. No. 1979, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., 5 (1952); H. R. Rep. No. 1923,
82d Cong., 2d Sess., 6 (1952)].
However, the Commissioner ignores BOTH the US Constitution and Congress.
How are these inventions obstructed? The Commissioner and his agents
purport energy measurement, generation, and storage have no utility -
that is, they are not useful. This is at least sociopathic behavior
because while this was done, the Commission for Patents and his Patent Office
continued to issue idiotic patents for inventions used to "predict" lottery numbers
based on astrology [e.g. Patent 6,371,482] claiming that they have "operability"
and "utility" while energy inventions do not.
REASON 2.
A report was being prepared on this cover-up by the patent office
{might even now make an upcoming GOTTA SEE THIS}
so a freedom of information act [FOIA] request for information was filed.
In response, it was obstructed by the Patent Office and its lawyers.
The lawyer inaccurately purported that Americans
(and therefore FReepers) have no interest in hearing about
or being informed about any possible cover-up at the Patent Office or
Commerce Department. It is not true.
[Why was it obstructed? One possibility is to protect long-term funding for select
technologies over others [e.g. gasoline and Tokamak].
Another possibility is that the Patent Office
may have been caught giving US patent applications to the Communist Chinese
in exchange for political campaign donations to the DNC.]
========================
Please help FReep.
FReep the Commissioner for Patents, Nicholas Godici.
His telephone number is 703 305 8800
[ Fax:703 305 8825 email: Nicholas.Godici@USPTO.gov]
[FWIW, his boss' number (Judge James Rogan, Dir. Intell Property
at the Commerce Dept.) is 703 305 8600 ]
If you FReep by telephone, as always, respect and courtesy
are as important as the issues.
---> If you believe in the US Constitution and the wisdom of the founding fathers,
if you believe in the importance of US security and the greatness of American ingenuity,
please inform the Commissioner for Patents that both he and the Patent Office are wrong.
Tell them that alternative energy inventions are important to the United States and they
have "utility" - and to stop fabricating lame excuses to prevent American creativity from
being useful and reaching the American public.
---> If you believe in the importance of accountability
or American creativity (or both),
then FReep and inform/update the Commissioner for Patents
that he and others at the Patent Office 'should get out more' because he is wrong.
Please inform and update him that FReepers and all Americans (and allies)
are deeply interested in accountability issues
including those which might involve the Patent Office or the Commerce Department.
Inform him as to whether energy inventions which measure, generate, or store energy
are important to the USA and the Free world and its citizens and therefore have "utility".
They need to actually work.
Note also that they are not asking for $$$$ from the government
[in contrast to some who actively suppress this],
but rather a 'level playing field'.
Someone claims to have an invention that makes more energy than it consumes, and asks for a patent. The patent office, aware of various laws of physics, recognizes that energy can not be created or destroyed, but converted in various forms, and that no one has found a way to make the third law of thermodynamics (entropy of the universe is increasing)null and void ... refuses to issue a patent - because to do so would be to suggest that the Patent Office believes that the 3rd law of thermodynamics is no longer valid.
The "inventor" then claims his rights are violated ... issues conspiracy alerts (put on tin foil hats please!) ... and asks for a letter righting campaign to the Patent Office.
As said before ... this has been going on for DECADES.
I figure that if someone HAD discovered a new principle - that they would have gone further to make an operational model that would work for hours or days ... and then they could take the working model to the Patent Office and insist on getting a patent. But the "inventor" claims that to make a fully operational model would place their intellectual property rights at risk ... so they don't finish the development of a working model. (Adjust tin foi please.)
Problem is, the "test models" use a motor (energy input) to set a rotor spinning. The brief power output from the model is less than the energy inputted by the motor. These "inventions" have been around for decades. They don't work. Any one with an engineering degree or physics degree can provide the equations to show why the concepts are flawed ... and never has an "inventor" ever proven his concepts are based on ANY sound physics principles, never have they developed a working model.
But our general public, poorly educated in scientific principles, might be swayed into believing that the poor "inventor" is oppressed by the horrible and mean Patent Office. (But it is all b.s.!)
Mike, B.S., M.S., P.E.
Furthermore, just because things have gone on improperly for decades
is no reason to continue it.
One last scientific matter.
Unless things have changed, you are also inacccurate about thermodynamics.
What you call the 3rd law is actually the 2nd.
The 3rd used to be: "you can't get out of the game".
You might be correct in that it is time to sweep the Clinton holdovers out.
For FReepers and scientists who care about what is going on:
New Scientist Features Cold Fusion
"No sooner had cold fusion surfaced than it was written off, and the idea of
extracting virtually limitless free energy from water became taboo. So how come
a small band of experienced researchers working for the US Navy just can't let
it drop?"
Theoretical Framework for Anomalous Heat and 4He in Transition Metal Systems
Deuteron Fluxing and the Ion Band State Theory
Calorimetric Principles and Problems in Pd-D2O Electrolysis
Anomalous Effects in Deuterated Systems, Final Report
Thermal and Nuclear Aspects of the Pd/D2O System, Vol 1
Thermal and Nuclear Aspects of the Pd/D2O System, Vol 2
"...California is experiencing rolling blackouts due to power shortages.
Conventional engineering, planned ahead, could have prevented these
blackouts, but it has been politically expedient to ignore the inevitable.
We do not know if Cold Fusion will be the answer to future energy needs,
but we do know the existence of Cold Fusion phenomenon through
repeated observations by scientists throughout the world.
It is time that this phenomenon be investigated
so that we can reap whatever benefits accrue from additional scientific understanding.
It is time for government funding organizations to invest in this research"
Dr. Frank E. Gordon
Head, Navigation and Applied Sciences Department
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.