Skip to comments.
U.S. Fumes Over Cuba's Re-Election to U.N. Rights Panel
FNC ^
| 04/30/03
| Jim Angle
Posted on 04/30/2003 5:55:56 AM PDT by m1-lightning
Wednesday, April 30, 2003
WASHINGTON The White House on Tuesday expressed outrage that Cuba has been re-elected to the U.N. Human Rights Commission, only three weeks after rounding up dozens of dissidents and sending them to prison.
"This is a setback for the cause of human rights. Cuba does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Commission. Cuba deserves to be investigated by the Human Rights Commission," said White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer.
While the United States was preoccupied with the Iraq war, Cuban leader Fidel Castro arrested 78 dissidents, journalists and librarians and "tried" them for treason, giving them varying prison sentences of as long as 28 years.
The same commission that by acclamation Tuesday allowed Cuba to remain a member, earlier this month voted to investigate the mass arrests. It was treated with resistance.
"The Human Rights Commission wanted to send investigators into Cuba and Cuba said 'no.' And yet, today, Cuba gets re-elected to the Human Rights Commission. It raises troubling issues, and that's why the United States is speaking out about it," Fleischer said.
The Bush administration lobbied against the vote to keep Cuba on the panel, but in the end threw up its hands, suggesting the commission is a lost cause.
"You have to keep in mind that Libya is the chairman of this committee. There are some things that happen at the United Nations that it's very hard for anybody to explain," Fleischer said.
U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Economic Social Council Sichan Siv, who served as the U.S. representative at Tuesday's commission meeting, got up and walked out when it became clear Cuba was going to win the vote.
"It was an outrage for us because we view Cuba as the worst violator of human rights in this hemisphere," he said.
Siv said the arrests aren't the only travesties committed by Castro. Cubans trying to escape Castro's regime have mounted several hijackings recently, including a plane flown to Key West and a ferryboat also headed to Florida. While hijackings are illegal, Castro didn't bother with anything like a trial, Siv said.
"They arrested three hijackers. After one week of incarceration, they shot them no trial no justice or nothing," he said.
Castro's summary executions surprised and dismayed even his longtime defenders. It also riled longtime critics in the U.S. Congress.
"Allowing Cuba to stay on the Human Rights Commission is like honoring Saddam Hussein with the Nobel Peace Prize," said Florida Republican Rep. Mark Foley.
Foley is introducing a congressional resolution calling on the United Nations to reverse its decision.
Fox News' Jim Angle contributed to this report.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Cuba; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Illinois; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: cuba; humanrights; un; unhrc; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-55 next last
To: m1-lightning
U.S. representative at Tuesday's commission meeting, got up and walked out He should just keep walking, don't look back.
2
posted on
04/30/2003 6:04:59 AM PDT
by
LisaAnne
(I know, i't's not a ladylike thing to say)
To: m1-lightning
Fox just said it should be renamed the anti-
Human Rights Commission.
3
posted on
04/30/2003 6:07:34 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Rush agrees with me 98.5 % of the time.)
To: LisaAnne
Agree. I wonder how long we are going to continue letting the UN rub our nose in it. I SO want us out of there.
To: m1-lightning
They're just doing this to annoy us. If we show outrage we're playing right into their hands. We need to just laugh and get up from the table and go for beers.
To: m1-lightning
I think it's time to voice our displeasure and disengage from this now useless organization
6
posted on
04/30/2003 6:12:21 AM PDT
by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
To: m1-lightning
Perhaps the US should start behaving like most UN members-- don't pay our dues, but retain our permanent seat on the Security Council and veto just about any Security Council resolution that comes along.
To: m1-lightning
How about walking out of the UN......for good?
8
posted on
04/30/2003 6:12:38 AM PDT
by
rrstar96
(Strength and Honor!)
To: m1-lightning
"U.S. Fumes Over Cuba's Re-Election to U.N. Rights Panel" I thought the headline read:
U.N. Fumes Over Cuba's Re-Election U.N. Rights Panel
To: Dead Corpse; ohmage; asneditor; pianomikey; dljordan; kcordell; Madcelt; Libertarianize the GOP; ...
Ping
10
posted on
04/30/2003 6:15:36 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
What is going to finally push the American people over the edge to say, Let's get the heck out of the U. N. It can't be much more than this joke of allowing Cuba to be on the Rights Commission.
11
posted on
04/30/2003 6:16:05 AM PDT
by
cloud8
To: tuna_battle_slight_return
That's straight of the FNC website
12
posted on
04/30/2003 6:16:55 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
Already posted twice yesterday.
HERE and
HERE
13
posted on
04/30/2003 6:19:02 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(The U.N. needs a good Flush!)
To: m1-lightning
This is a sick joke right? Sad Sad Sad...how much longer people...
14
posted on
04/30/2003 6:19:11 AM PDT
by
Lucas1
To: ImpotentRage
Yeah, it's time to get out. The UN doesn't even stand for what it was originally intended for. We don't need blue helmet referees in war.
15
posted on
04/30/2003 6:19:38 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: The Great RJ
I agree with your strategy.
Diplomatic vandalism.
16
posted on
04/30/2003 6:21:45 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: areafiftyone
I see. I guess it will either be pulled or more discussion will just continue.
17
posted on
04/30/2003 6:21:52 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
bttt
18
posted on
04/30/2003 6:31:52 AM PDT
by
firewalk
To: kidd
If we stay, we would be held accountable if we don't follow their idiotic resolutions. You know the other members don't open their mouths about such incidents unless the US is the one to break a resolution. At least if we get out then we are free from their beaurocracy and can do what we want.
19
posted on
04/30/2003 6:40:19 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
If we veto everything then there will be no resolutions to be held accountable to.
If we leave abruptly, then the UN becomes an organization that is galvanized against the US (more so than it already is).
I say kill the UN. You can't kill it if youre not part of it. Stop paying dues. Veto everything.
20
posted on
04/30/2003 6:54:19 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: kidd
Sure, until the next jimmy carter gets elected and signs a bunch of agreements with them.
21
posted on
04/30/2003 7:04:24 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
Un-FREAKIN'-believable.
22
posted on
04/30/2003 7:08:22 AM PDT
by
SquirrelKing
("Beware the barrenness of a busy life." - Socrates)
To: m1-lightning
The U.N is about as funny and outrageous as Bagdad Bob. Which makes me think, shouldn't Bagdad Bob replace Kofi Annan?
23
posted on
04/30/2003 7:10:17 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
(The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
To: m1-lightning
"This is a setback for the cause of human rights. Cuba does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Commission. Cuba deserves to be investigated by the Human Rights Commission."
The administration's moral clarity impresses me once again.
To: m1-lightning
That a good point. However, then we have a bigger problem than the UN.
25
posted on
04/30/2003 7:20:42 AM PDT
by
kidd
To: 1Old Pro
26
posted on
04/30/2003 7:25:44 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
Castro's summary executions surprised and dismayed even his longtime defenders. Another great example of how confused liberals are.
27
posted on
04/30/2003 7:34:24 AM PDT
by
Smile-n-Win
(V stands for Victory, and W is its plural!)
To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
FWIW, I ran a search for both Cuba and human rights before I posted. Got nothing more recent than several days ago.
28
posted on
04/30/2003 7:38:51 AM PDT
by
DED
(Liberals Never Learn. *LNL*)
To: m1-lightning
creating a Palestinian arab state, as the US wants be done, will be a set back to human rights as well.
29
posted on
04/30/2003 7:44:19 AM PDT
by
yonif
To: Smile-n-Win
Castro's summary executions surprised and dismayed even his longtime defenders.

So many were surprised of Saddam's atrocities as well.
30
posted on
04/30/2003 7:45:56 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: yonif
How is that a setback?
31
posted on
04/30/2003 7:48:07 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: kansas_jayhawks2003
Ping
32
posted on
04/30/2003 7:50:52 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: big gray tabby
Actually we need to send a 'copy-boy' or janitor from the State Department as our representative on most issues, anything important comes up then our Ambassador can show up to veto it!
To: m1-lightning
CNN keeps saying that the nomination wasn't contested by anyone (including the U.S.) and they're implying that any outrage is hypocritical.
34
posted on
04/30/2003 8:07:01 AM PDT
by
Schnucki
To: Schnucki
The Communist's News Network said that?
35
posted on
04/30/2003 8:12:42 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
We don't need to send these people 300,000,000 dollars anymore. They stand around and laugh at us while they do this crap to us. We need to do something now while we can.
36
posted on
04/30/2003 9:49:58 AM PDT
by
grapeape
(Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Sheldon)
To: grapeape
It's a tought descision. Send them $1 and veto them to death or leave and backstab them in every gloabal opportunity.
37
posted on
04/30/2003 10:04:02 AM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
Willful blindness shattered by Cuba's crackdown - Castro shows the brutal face of his regime*** Perhaps the biggest shock was felt by the writers, poets and artists who have long defended Cuba and its autocratic ruler. The Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes called the country "a suffocating dictatorship", the Portuguese Nobel laureate José Saramago said Fidel Castro "cheated his enemies"
and the Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano, who once praised him as a "symbol of national dignity", acknowledged that the crackdown had fuelled opposition claims that he was a dictator. There have been demonstrations in Caracas and Madrid.***
To: All
Does anybody know the website of the UN Human Rights Comm ?
It should be interesting to see what the UN Human Rights
is doing .
39
posted on
04/30/2003 10:35:03 AM PDT
by
Orlando
To: m1-lightning
Now your talking.
Lets give them a good ole butt-whippin. Every day. They won't be laughing anymore when they have no money to throw around! Our money at that.
If you want to backstab them in every global opportunity it would be easier to do that through the UN. Whether it's through it or not these people still haven't learned that we are serious about the BS that they are pulling. We are not going to take it any more.
40
posted on
04/30/2003 10:39:16 AM PDT
by
grapeape
(Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Sheldon)
To: m1-lightning
The White House on Tuesday expressed outrage that Cuba has been re-elected to the U.N. Human Rights Commission, only three weeks after rounding up dozens of dissidents and sending them to prison. And this is one of the reasons that the UN is a complete and total joke
41
posted on
04/30/2003 10:41:20 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
To: m1-lightning
Any doubt of the irrelevance of the UN can now be safely discarded!
42
posted on
04/30/2003 10:42:40 AM PDT
by
Redleg Duke
(Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
Absolutely, completely and in all ways unacceptable. Why don't we just vote in France for the international humility commission? Colombia to the U.N. compassion comission? Why stop there? Let's vote in Amsterdam for morality and decency police, China for the pro-life commission, France for the abstinence commission (can they be on two?), and Switzerland as commander in chief of the UN "peacekeeping forces". And what panel would be complete without raising Stalin from the dead, ressurrecting USSR, and slapping him right on that free speech commission? Hitler for on the International Diversity League? Where does this end?
43
posted on
04/30/2003 11:21:37 AM PDT
by
pianomikey
(piano for prez)
To: m1-lightning
Absolutely, completely and in all ways unacceptable. Why don't we just vote in France for the international humility commission? Colombia to the U.N. compassion comission? Why stop there? Let's vote in Amsterdam for morality and decency police, China for the pro-life commission, France for the abstinence commission (can they be on two?), and Switzerland as commander in chief of the UN "peacekeeping forces". And what panel would be complete without raising Stalin from the dead, ressurrecting USSR, and slapping him right on that free speech commission? Hitler for on the International Diversity League? Where does this end?
44
posted on
04/30/2003 11:22:00 AM PDT
by
pianomikey
(piano for prez)
To: m1-lightning
Ok, how much did Castro and Chavez pay Kofi and the U.N.?
45
posted on
04/30/2003 11:28:10 AM PDT
by
chantal7
To: m1-lightning
RIGHT! This is just the excuse we need to get out of the damn place.
46
posted on
04/30/2003 11:56:22 AM PDT
by
Warren
To: pianomikey
It ends with HR 1146
47
posted on
04/30/2003 12:12:54 PM PDT
by
m1-lightning
(UN resolutions are quagmires)
To: m1-lightning
Thanx for the Ping! This is so not right. The UN is a horrific plight against mankind!!!
48
posted on
04/30/2003 12:58:59 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Fire the UN! Revoke their lease!!!)
To: m1-lightning
True, but HR 1146 only ends it for the US. The UN is, unfortunately, appearing pretty popular outside the US because it makes all the little 3rd-rate powers with LOUD VOICES (France, Switzerland, to a lesser extent Poland) feel like "Big Men." They need to read Mailer for a
white male ego boost!
Alas, I think we're stuck with the UN tumor for a while, even after the US withdraws. Maybe sometime down the road, America will start working on the chemotherapy of dismantling the UN before it goes malignant, if it's not too late. In any case, HR-1146 is the first step.
49
posted on
04/30/2003 1:04:00 PM PDT
by
pianomikey
(piano for prez)
To: pianomikey
Stick in the fork, the UN is....wait a minute. Forget the fork, there's not any meat left in the UN. Let's leave the table before others realize it and beat us to it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson