Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAY DAY
The Vanguard ^ | 5/1/03 | Rod D. Martin

Posted on 05/01/2003 12:17:31 AM PDT by ppaul

You would have never heard of Karl Marx had it not been for V.I. Lenin. Marx was neither terribly successful nor terribly important in his own right, and had it not been for a revolution carried out three decades after his death, he would be a footnote at best.

But on this May Day, the high holy day of Communism and Socialism, it is important that we remember.

As a student, both in England and America, I often heard the refrain -- even from conservatives -- that "communism wouldn't have been so bad if it had been carried out like Marx suggested, without all that junk from Lenin and Stalin." It still amazes me the degree to which this leftist propaganda can be passed off as true. It shows that the speaker has never read much (if any) Marx or Lenin, and, usually, that he wants to sound "intellectual". It also shows that socialists, whether of the national socialist (Nazi) or of the international socialist (Communist/Socialist) stripe, have been very successful in employing Herr Goebbels' doctrine of "the big lie."

In fact, Marx never produced a political program at all. The entirety of his plan for his new world order was contained in ten short points -- nothing more than slogans, really -- in his very first "book", the Communist Manifesto. He never defined them further. He never saw a need. Marx had grander work in mind.

He was producing a religion.

Marx, the anti-Semitic Jew, the hater of Christianity and all it stood for, created an entire atheology. It was, in the words of James Billington, "fire in the minds of men." Marx sought to turn the old order on its head, to regenerate mankind through chaos. He preached a dialectical view of history which seemed to derive from Fuerbach but really just represented ancient dualism. He propounded a materialism which he said "turned Hegel right-side up," and which said that no person was anything more than a mechanistically determined automaton, "matter in motion." He wedded to this a naively classical interpretation of the labor theory of value to produce his economics, and a utopian view of the state that said man, who was morally neutral and therefore perfectible, could be utterly re-made -- regenerated, or "saved" -- by a state or party which completely controlled and molded his environment.

To all of this he added an eschatology of victory, a certainty of success which was raised to the level of first principle, of dogma, of prerequisite faith. It is eternally worth noting that Whittaker Chambers, even when he embraced freedom, believed without question that he was abandoning the winning side. The contagiousness of the Communist faith was such that virtually everyone at the time agreed.

The tenor of the "worker's paradise" to come was already apparent in Marx's own leadership of the International Workingmen's Association, which was nothing if not dictatorial. Once in the hands of a state, however, Communist atheology became truly consistent with its presuppositions. Since the individual man was just a biological machine, he could be discarded at will. Since good and evil were entirely relative, they could be defined entirely by the party and therefore by the state. Since the state/party could and must regenerate man and build the paradise to come, it's power must be absolute and unquestioned.

And since victory was inevitable, millions gave up their individuality, their families, even their lives, without a fight.

Marx's atheology created the greatest idol of all, the idol of the omnipotent state. This idol appealed to men more than any other in history, because it made all morality relative and it gave ambitious men the means to become gods themselves. But it also appealed precisely because it was not an idol of stone or wood, but an idol of power: prayers to it could be answered, needs and greeds fulfilled. And because it indulged all of man's basest instincts while ever appealing to his noblest motives, it was exactly the sort of god man wanted to create, a god in his own image.

Marx's work was nothing new -- it was the logical conclusion of left-wing Enlightenment humanism, and had roots as old as Pharaoh -- and it was left to others -- Lenin, Stalin, Mao -- to carry out his work. Yet Marx's idol was and remains in many ways the most successful false god of human history. In its heyday enslaving more than half the world (and nearly taking the rest), its presuppositions still remain the dominant faith of the ruling elites of most of the western world. That is itself a terrifying thought. Marxism in this century killed a hundred million people, and sent probably two billion to hell. It withered whatever it touched, and it frankly touched us all.

If Lenin's minions were the "vanguard" of the old revolution, we must be the vanguard of the new. Nothing has taught us better than Marxism the danger of holding false theological presuppositions, even in the absence of a clear political program. Mankind may embrace the truth, or he may embrace a lie. The difference between the American Revolution and the Russian is the difference between worlds; and it is that better world -- indeed a better world even still -- which we must build.

*****

This column first appeared (with minor differences) on 1 May 1998. -- Rod D. Martin, Founder and Chairman of Vanguard PAC http://www.theVanguard.org, is an attorney and writer from Little Rock, Arkansas. A former policy director to Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, he is the Center for Cultural Leadership's Senior Fellow in Public Policy and Political Affairs, and Special Counsel to PayPal.com Founder Peter Thiel.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: atheism; atheist; capitalism; capitalist; communism; communist; communistmanifesto; dialctic; dialectic; karlmarx; lenin; manifesto; marx; marxism; materialism; mayday; nationalsocialism; socialism; socialist; statist; ussr

1 posted on 05/01/2003 12:17:31 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ppaul
BUMP
2 posted on 05/01/2003 1:27:23 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul


3 posted on 05/01/2003 1:31:19 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona; Flying Circus; Cincinatus' Wife; William McKinley; rockfish59
ping
4 posted on 05/01/2003 1:32:35 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul

Two headless statues of Lenin, lying in a salvage yard in Vilnius, Lithuania.

5 posted on 05/01/2003 1:35:50 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
6 posted on 05/01/2003 1:41:08 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
That 100 million people killed....

Is that random senseless killing....or do they take requests?

7 posted on 05/01/2003 1:44:27 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; ppaul


Cuban employees fix flags in the streets as they prepare the May Day demonstration, Wednesday April 30, 2003 in Havana, Cuba. Cuban governement wants this demonstration to be the biggest of the revolutionnary period. (AP Photo/Jose Goitia)

8 posted on 05/01/2003 1:48:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
In fact, Marx never produced a political program at all. The entirety of his plan for his new world order was contained in ten short points -- nothing more than slogans, really -- in his very first "book", the Communist Manifesto. He never defined them further. He never saw a need. Marx had grander work in mind.

This is not something that has ever been hidden from me, all of the professors who have taught about Marx have mentioned this (whether you think Marx is right or wrong is not the same as whether you think his ideas are worth studying, given the influence he's had on the world). In fact, Marx wrote more than just small polemical books like the manifesto (which was intended for a non-academic audience) but also wrote big fat tomes on economics--and he predicted things like globalization. Marx didn't think many people would die for his revolution, he thought it would be the next natural phase in economics--just like when European countries started moving towards industrialization.

This demonization of Marx as some sort of evil plotter who was "producing a religion" or planning mass murder (despite never having written about it) is wrong, and it makes conservatives look stupid, backwards, and hostile to books and education.

It's pretty clear that Marx was right about some interesting things (which he picked up on well before their time, such as globalization) but was wrong about what it meant as a whole. There was no communist revolution the way he envisioned it (whether or not he would have approved of Lenin's revolution is another question, but Marx certainly didn't tell anyone to carry out mass murder). And from what we now know, from the bloody history of the 20th century, there will probably never be a successful communist state, as concentrating power in the government only leads to bad things--from economic stagnation in Sweden to mass murder in the USSR.

But Marx couldn't have known all of this at the time he was writing. Remember, at the time he was writing, factory conditions were not so great, and workers were geniunely abused by factory owners (and discarded when they were no longer useful). The stereotypical evil, heartless capitalist did exist back in his day. We can cut Karl some slack without letting the mass murderers who followed him off the hook. And giving Karl a break doesn't mean excusing 21st century communists, who really should know better by now.

And WHO FRIGGIN' CARES if he was against the Jewish religion? (he was against the Jewish religion, not the Jewish people, so he wasn't "anti-Semitic," that term was coined to mean hating Jews based on their race) A LOT of people were anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic back then. It's a credit to George Washington that he wasn't a Jew-hater, but it's not like it would have invalidated the American Revolution if he was one (and most of the Founding Fathers sort of, uh, owned slaves, you know).

9 posted on 05/01/2003 1:49:54 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Marx certainly didn't tell anyone to carry out mass murder

I don't think anyone is claiming that Marx told anyone to carry out mass murder. I think they claim his Utopian philosophy did provide the theoretical underpinnings of the regimes that did commit mass murder.

it makes conservatives look stupid, backwards, and hostile to books and education.

I think that brilliant scholars have written works that criticize Marxoint by point, and they aren't ``stupid, backwards, and hostile to books and education.''

10 posted on 05/01/2003 2:00:14 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Workers of the World Unite! (or you will be arrested and tortured- Fidel)
11 posted on 05/01/2003 2:01:10 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
But on this May Day, the high holy day of Communism and Socialism,

May 1st is also a high holy day for Satanists and witches. Gee, what a coincidense.

12 posted on 05/01/2003 2:06:48 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
It is interesting that W picked today to showcase the American Military by landing on an aircraft carrier.
13 posted on 05/01/2003 4:55:30 AM PDT by AMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Well said.
14 posted on 05/01/2003 5:13:51 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
it gave ambitious men the means to become gods
F.A. Hayek had a chapter in his WWII classic The Road to Serfdom entitled

Why the Worst Get on Top

Marxism is nothing but a fig leaf for tyranny.
All the rest is window dressing.


15 posted on 05/01/2003 5:55:58 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Marx's atheology created the greatest idol of all, the idol of the omnipotent state. This idol appealed to men more than any other in history, because it made all morality relative and it gave ambitious men the means to become gods themselves. But it also appealed precisely because it was not an idol of stone or wood, but an idol of power: prayers to it could be answered, needs and greeds fulfilled. And because it indulged all of man's basest instincts while ever appealing to his noblest motives, it was exactly the sort of god man wanted to create, a god in his own image.

This is the one thing that doesn't ever seem to translate when talking to leftists. There is no encouraged morality, no need to apply oneself. There is no need to be socially responsible because the state will take care of the individual. This does not encourage work. Not at all.
16 posted on 05/01/2003 6:23:07 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
You posted this too early in the morning; it should be read by all FReepers.

Bump!

17 posted on 05/01/2003 6:55:53 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (...........Please hold............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Thanks for the ping.
18 posted on 05/01/2003 7:47:37 AM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Leftism-as-a-Religion Bump.
19 posted on 05/01/2003 7:54:30 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (...........Please hold............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
It is pinko commie day. The only good commie, is a....well, you know.
20 posted on 05/01/2003 7:55:32 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
um, no its not. Its actually a really old pagan holiday. Maybe Marx hijacked it, but May Day is MUCH older then his silly dogma....

http://paganwiccan.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.strangehorizons.com%2F2001%2F20010423%2Fbeltane.shtml

http://paganwiccan.about.com/cs/aboutbeltane/

21 posted on 05/01/2003 8:05:13 AM PDT by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FeliciaCat
um, no its not. Its actually a really old pagan holiday. Maybe Marx hijacked it, but May Day is MUCH older then his silly dogma....

It probably is a pagan holiday, but the commies use it, and that is my only point. I believe Christmas and Easter are pagan holidays too, but I don't let it get me down.

22 posted on 05/01/2003 8:23:39 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Marx certainly didn't tell anyone to carry out mass murder.....

He said there is no God.
Take that idea to its conclusion, and you'll end up there.
There's pleanty of proof.

23 posted on 05/01/2003 8:36:16 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
You posted this too early in the morning; it should be read by all FReepers.

Well, then keep it ping'ed.
FReepers of the world! Man your ping lists!!!

24 posted on 05/01/2003 8:39:12 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
May 1st is also a high holy day for Satanists and witches. Gee, what a coincidense

I think most witches celebrate on solstices and equinoxes, not May Day. I'm not an expert by any means on this topic however ....

25 posted on 05/01/2003 9:25:23 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
BTTT
26 posted on 05/01/2003 9:45:42 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (...........Please hold............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited; Jack Black
May 1st is also a high holy day for Satanists and witches. Gee, what a coincidence

Earth Day is the same day as V.I. Lenin's birthday - but not by coincidence. Its founder planned it that way.

27 posted on 05/01/2003 10:10:58 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
bttt
28 posted on 05/01/2003 12:51:38 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson