Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOMBSHELL: "Justice Alerted to False Testimony Allegations in McVeigh Case, Did Not Tell Defense"
Associated Press ^ | By John Solomon Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/01/2003 7:38:25 AM PDT by OutSpot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: sam_paine
"Knock, knock. Western Union!"
41 posted on 05/01/2003 8:22:07 AM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty
Welcome to FreeReepublic first of all...

You wrote: "This is old news, actually.

It first came out one month before he was executed. I believe it was run around the same time they announced boxes had been found that were not presented as evidence."

The Article cited:

"Justice officials said Wednesday the letter was routed to Ashcroft's clerical office in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, where it sat for nearly two months and then was forwarded to the FBI - well after McVeigh was executed."

Boy either you know more information than the Department of Justice or you did not read the article above.

42 posted on 05/01/2003 8:23:27 AM PDT by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
McVeigh was executed before he changed his mind and decided to spill his guts.

And if we were still waiting for McVeigh to spill his guts, you'd be arguing that we should continue to keep him alive because he just "might" finally "tell the truth," some day!

You tinfoilers are unbelieveable!

43 posted on 05/01/2003 8:24:22 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
What are you saying Hermann

"The ends always justifies the means"
44 posted on 05/01/2003 8:24:28 AM PDT by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
If McVeigh was guilty, why should the FBI have to lie about factual evidence?
For the same reason some of the cops lied in the OJ Simpson case--to make the case stronger. One doesn't have to think OJ was innocent to also think that the cops fudged around with the evidence. The problem in that case was that they were no match for the defense team.
45 posted on 05/01/2003 8:24:39 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Wow. The mind plays tricks sometimes. I'm amazed, it was five years.
46 posted on 05/01/2003 8:24:48 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: OutSpot
BUMP
48 posted on 05/01/2003 8:25:48 AM PDT by Dante3 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: sam_paine
" outside lawyers should have done more than send it by fax and courier"

I have a question-
Assuming that what they said about mishandling the mail is true [snort, giggle, LOL] what are we supposed to think happens when one of our alert citizens notifies the FBI that he sees 20 Islamists, singing Death to America!, dragging bombs down the street?

That his notification ends up in a dead file in the suburbs?

50 posted on 05/01/2003 8:27:48 AM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HARD ATTACK 51
Tim McVeigh had that smirk on his face,,,, the kind of smirk that would define 'you suckers have no idea'...

...how friggin' stupid I am.."

51 posted on 05/01/2003 8:29:09 AM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
"I agree. McVeigh was executed before he changed his mind and decided to spill his guts."

Are you kidding? He was bound and gagged after the conviction? He had ample opportuinty before he was executed either on his own or via his attorney to speak to the media, public, judge -- anyone about anything.


52 posted on 05/01/2003 8:29:50 AM PDT by Olde School
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot
bump
53 posted on 05/01/2003 8:30:55 AM PDT by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
And a separate issue. If they've committed perjury, charge them. But it does nothing to negate McVeigh's guilt.

It's a separate issue indeed! Please see the article at the top of this thread. Is it about whether McVeigh was guilty or not, or is it about government agents giving false testimony at a trial, and failing to inform the defense about it as legally required? Thanks in advance for your reply to this question.

54 posted on 05/01/2003 8:32:59 AM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
Did you see that other gun go off in the grassy knoll?

Seriesly, McVeigh could not have acted on his own.

We may NEVER know the truth about who else was acting along with McVeigh - but from what I've seen it could have very well be Iraqi agents seeking retribution for Desert Storm on behalf of Saddam Hussein.

McVeigh was seen with Iraqis in Oklahoma City in the days just before the bombing.

Many, many theories, perhaps more info may miraculously surface to the top during our shakedown of Iraq (if Saddam sponsored the bobming).

55 posted on 05/01/2003 8:34:27 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeTheHostages
I don't think there are many people who doubt McVeigh's guilt. I think the real issue is wherher evidence was withheld from the jury that might have led them to make a different decision on whether McVeigh should be executed.
56 posted on 05/01/2003 8:35:17 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
Something that shows it was given directly to the people who would have had to act on it comes to mind. A registered letter with signature required, perhaps?
57 posted on 05/01/2003 8:35:37 AM PDT by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
Clinton was in a hurry, and that's a worry.

So was the administration succeeding Clinton's.

58 posted on 05/01/2003 8:36:07 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black
What was McVeigh, about 2 from arrest to injection?

Because he voluntarily waived his appeals.

59 posted on 05/01/2003 8:36:34 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"There is only one relevant question here - did McVeigh or did he not help blow up the building."

He confessed to it in his book...

McVeigh Comes Clean

60 posted on 05/01/2003 8:36:50 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson