Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SARS cases pass 6,000; more than 400 dead
upi ^ | 05/02/2003 | Michael Smith

Posted on 05/03/2003 4:01:22 AM PDT by Judith Anne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: aristeides
Dr. Shabas, the one who said that SARS stopped itself, is head of one of the hospitals in Canada that was shut down. I think he has an agenda, here, and I think that the draconian measures, the shutdown of the affected hospitals, the isolation of SARS patients, the quarantine of 10,000 exposed and the hospital infection control measures are what stopped the epidemic.

I guess I still disagree with Dr. Shabas, and I still think he's a)dumb or b)has an agenda.

I could be wrong. Maybe, unlike China, SARS stopped itself in Canada.
41 posted on 05/03/2003 8:04:30 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ricpic
"He cautioned that even if the virus changes so that it causes less severe disease, that might not be a good thing--people might not get sick enough to go to the hospital and therefore would spread SARS more easily."

No ---a less virulent strain could provide you with some cross-immunity if you get the full-blown disease of the less virulent strain ---vaccines aren't as effective. Then if it mutates again to more virulent it won't get you because you'd have partial protection while you make specific antibodies. Already 5600 people who had SARS are now immune to it, and less virulent strains appear to be emerging which will give more people immunity.

42 posted on 05/03/2003 8:09:43 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
There are many diseases spread to hospital patients because they're in a weakened state already ---but also because of the way airflow in many hospitals is designed. They often recycle air over and over ---you're bound to get sick if you're in a hospital. They've already found that TB was being spread in some hospitals because the air goes from one patient's room out into the hallways, exposes the nursing station and other rooms. Even if hospitals use outdoor air, many hospitals are in urban areas and pigeons roost near the vents and windows so whatever is in the bird droppings gets circulated throughout the hospital.
43 posted on 05/03/2003 8:14:18 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
FITZ, that would be true, if those people did indeed have immunity. But the coronavirus family, source of the ubiquitous common cold, has eluded immunity for centuries, so I doubt that they are immune. Already, more strains of SARS are being discovered, likely due to spontaneous mutations.

This may well be a mutation of the common cold, of which there are more than 200 strains.
44 posted on 05/03/2003 8:16:43 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
If 6000 had SARS and 400 died, then 5600 recovered ---they aren't now dying so they must have immunity. They'll probably never die of a coronavirus --most of us don't. I know they mutate ---but there must be some cross-immunity to related strains. If there are 200 strains, and you've been exposed to even one fourth --you're probably at least partially protected against most ---enough that you won't die before your immune system kicks in which takes a couple weeks.
45 posted on 05/03/2003 8:25:59 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; per loin; aristeides; CathyRyan; riri; blam; Domestic Church; dc-zoo
FITZ, unfortunately, the recovery rate is not 5600. There are a huge percent of those people still in the hospital, many of whom will not recover, but will die. Sorry. And so far, there are a small but increasing number of relapses.

Maybe some of the other posters I pinged can verify this, if you don't want to take my word for it.
46 posted on 05/03/2003 8:30:40 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; per loin
If 6000 had SARS and 400 died, then 5600 recovered

They haven't recovered yet, a lot of them. I don't know the total number of recoveries, but I'm pretty sure it's a lot lower than that. A lot of people are still in hospitals, and I think we can presume a large proportion of those will eventually die.

47 posted on 05/03/2003 8:31:14 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; FITZ; per loin
I think that the number of recoveries listed are about the same as the number of deaths...I'm not sure, though...
48 posted on 05/03/2003 8:36:06 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Judith Anne
I still think something else is going on. Common colds ---some of which are coronaviruses spread a lot faster ---I can talk to someone in one state one day and they say there's a cold or flu going around and by the next day I find out I've got it too --- Colds and Flus quickly infect millions within weeks --- it seems this SARS is slow moving if anything.
49 posted on 05/03/2003 8:38:59 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Okay.
50 posted on 05/03/2003 8:42:17 AM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Fitz as you can see less than half have recovered. As a matter of fact 56% haven't.

Country   Cumulative number of case(s)2   Number of new cases since last WHO update2   Number of deaths   Number recovered3   Date last probable case reported   Date for which cumulative number of cases is current  
Australia   4   0   0   4   23/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Brazil   2   0   0   2   10/Apr/2003   24/Apr/2003  
Bulgaria   1   0   0   0   24/Apr/2003   28/Apr/2003  
Canada   149   2   22   93   1/May/2003   1/May/2003  
China   3799   176   181   1372   2/May/2003   2/May/2003  
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region4   1611   11   170   878   2/May/2003   2/May/2003  
China, Macao Special Administrative Region   1   0   0   0   30/Apr/2003   30/Apr/2003  
China, Taiwan   100   11   8   25   2/May/2003   2/May/2003  
France   5   0   0   4   11/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Germany   7   0   0   7   22/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Indonesia   2   0   0   1   23/Apr/2003   30/Apr/2003  
Italy   9   0   0   4   29/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Kuwait   1   0   0   1   9/Apr/2003   20/Apr/2003  
Malaysia   6   0   2   3   28/Apr/2003   1/May/2003  
Mongolia   8   2   0   4   1/May/2003   1/May/2003  
New Zealand   1   1   0   1   30/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Philippines   3   0   2   1   28/Apr/2003   29/Apr/2003  
Poland   1   0   0   0   1/May/2003   1/May/2003  
Republic of Ireland   1   0   0   1   21/Mar/2003   24/Apr/2003  
Republic of Korea   1   0   0   0   29/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Romania   1   0   0   1   27/Mar/2003   22/Apr/2003  
Singapore   203   2   25   146   2/May/2003   2/May/2003  
South Africa   1   0   0   0   9/Apr/2003   9/Apr/2003  
Spain   1   0   0   1   2/Apr/2003   24/Apr/2003  
Sweden   3   0   0   2   18/Apr/2003   23/Apr/2003  
Switzerland   1   0   0   1   17/Mar/2003   1/May/2003  
Thailand   7   0   2   5   12/Apr/2003   30/Apr/2003  
United Kingdom   6   0   0   6   11/Apr/2003   1/May/2003  
United States   56   2   0   24   30/Apr/2003   30/Apr/2003  
Viet Nam   63   0   5   56   14/Apr/2003   2/May/2003  
Total   6054   207   417   2643  

enough that you won't die before your immune system kicks in which takes a couple weeks.

Dude it is your immune system THAT KILLS you!

51 posted on 05/03/2003 8:46:17 AM PDT by Nov3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; All
Singapore: Most SARS Victims Infected in Hospitals.
52 posted on 05/03/2003 8:50:03 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
SARS Mortality Rates [reflects treatment]
Based on World Health Organization daily tables                 (Revised: 5/03am)
Area Recoveries to date Deaths to date Recent** Death Rate Active Cases still in Danger Projected Future Deaths Projected Cumulative Mortality
Hong Kong 878 170 17.2% 563 97 16.6%
Singapore 146 25 23.1% 32 7 15.8%
China 1372 181 41.0% 2246 921 29.0%
Canada 93 22 26.9% 34 9 20.8%
elsewhere
[26 countries]
154 19 18.8% 119 22 14.0%
World-wide
[all 30 countries]
2643 417   2994 1056 24.3%
**  ( Deaths in the last 7 days) / ( Deaths + Recoveries in the last 7 days)
Trend - Active Cases Still in Danger [reflects containment]
Date Hong Kong Singapore China Canada elsewhere
26 countries
World-wide
all 30 countries
Apr 19 914 61 307 62   1616
Apr 20 893 64 497 65   1694
Apr 21 (est.) 872 66 686 66   1771
Apr 22 874 60 708 61 80 1783
Apr 23 831 58 968 62 86 2005
Apr 24 812 55 1058 58 76 2059
Apr 25 781 50 1209 51 78 2169
Apr 26 774 51 1346 47 86 2304
Apr 27 (est.) 738 45 1415 47 98 2336
Apr 28 709 39 1484 47 108 2387
Apr 29 663 38 1833 40 108 2682
Apr 30 641 38 1969 41 132 2821
May 1 604 33 2117 40 117 2911
May 2 563 32 2246 34 119 2994
(includes new daily cases... excludes cases resolved by death or recovery)

Observations:

Here is a COOL " Interactive guide - The spread of Sars"

53 posted on 05/03/2003 8:52:36 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; jonathonandjennifer; Mr. Mulliner; Prince Charles; Dog Gone; thinktwice; eggman; Betty Jo; ...
SARS - Treatment/Containment tables - update ping

54 posted on 05/03/2003 8:54:50 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer; All
Interesting how the number of active cases has dropped substantially in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Canada, risen slightly in the rest of the world, but risen massively in Red China. Using the Chicoms' figures, 75% of the active cases are now in Red China. Since their figures are almost certainly still too low, the true percentage is undoubtedly even higher than that.
55 posted on 05/03/2003 8:59:11 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
How many people besides those showing symptoms have had a SARS antibody titer performed on their blood? Do we really know that the cases listed are the only ones there have been? What if some people felt a little under the weather, didn't go to the doctor, didn't get treated but got better and it was really SARS?
56 posted on 05/03/2003 8:59:45 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: neither-nor; All
Another confirmed SARS patient in Kolkata.
57 posted on 05/03/2003 9:04:56 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
The only times most SARS victims have been infected in hospitals is when that is the only place they COULD be infected. In a good isolation/quarantine system, that is the way it is SUPPOSED to work.

The initial worldwide spread was not through hospitals. Most SARS victims in China were NOT infected in hospitals. Most SARS victims even in Hong Kong were not infected in hospitals (although a lot were).
58 posted on 05/03/2003 9:05:02 AM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
Good info, thanks.
59 posted on 05/03/2003 9:08:05 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Is the growth exponential anywhere besides China?

I included all cases world wide.

60 posted on 05/03/2003 9:10:40 AM PDT by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson