Skip to comments.
SARS cases pass 6,000; more than 400 dead
upi ^
| 05/02/2003
| Michael Smith
Posted on 05/03/2003 4:01:22 AM PDT by Judith Anne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
To: aristeides
Dr. Shabas, the one who said that SARS stopped itself, is head of one of the hospitals in Canada that was shut down. I think he has an agenda, here, and I think that the draconian measures, the shutdown of the affected hospitals, the isolation of SARS patients, the quarantine of 10,000 exposed and the hospital infection control measures are what stopped the epidemic.
I guess I still disagree with Dr. Shabas, and I still think he's a)dumb or b)has an agenda.
I could be wrong. Maybe, unlike China, SARS stopped itself in Canada.
To: ricpic
"He cautioned that even if the virus changes so that it causes less severe disease, that might not be a good thing--people might not get sick enough to go to the hospital and therefore would spread SARS more easily."No ---a less virulent strain could provide you with some cross-immunity if you get the full-blown disease of the less virulent strain ---vaccines aren't as effective. Then if it mutates again to more virulent it won't get you because you'd have partial protection while you make specific antibodies. Already 5600 people who had SARS are now immune to it, and less virulent strains appear to be emerging which will give more people immunity.
42
posted on
05/03/2003 8:09:43 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: aristeides
There are many diseases spread to hospital patients because they're in a weakened state already ---but also because of the way airflow in many hospitals is designed. They often recycle air over and over ---you're bound to get sick if you're in a hospital. They've already found that TB was being spread in some hospitals because the air goes from one patient's room out into the hallways, exposes the nursing station and other rooms. Even if hospitals use outdoor air, many hospitals are in urban areas and pigeons roost near the vents and windows so whatever is in the bird droppings gets circulated throughout the hospital.
43
posted on
05/03/2003 8:14:18 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
FITZ, that would be true, if those people did indeed have immunity. But the coronavirus family, source of the ubiquitous common cold, has eluded immunity for centuries, so I doubt that they are immune. Already, more strains of SARS are being discovered, likely due to spontaneous mutations.
This may well be a mutation of the common cold, of which there are more than 200 strains.
To: Judith Anne
If 6000 had SARS and 400 died, then 5600 recovered ---they aren't now dying so they must have immunity. They'll probably never die of a coronavirus --most of us don't. I know they mutate ---but there must be some cross-immunity to related strains. If there are 200 strains, and you've been exposed to even one fourth --you're probably at least partially protected against most ---enough that you won't die before your immune system kicks in which takes a couple weeks.
45
posted on
05/03/2003 8:25:59 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ; per loin; aristeides; CathyRyan; riri; blam; Domestic Church; dc-zoo
FITZ, unfortunately, the recovery rate is not 5600. There are a huge percent of those people still in the hospital, many of whom will not recover, but will die. Sorry. And so far, there are a small but increasing number of relapses.
Maybe some of the other posters I pinged can verify this, if you don't want to take my word for it.
To: FITZ; per loin
If 6000 had SARS and 400 died, then 5600 recovered They haven't recovered yet, a lot of them. I don't know the total number of recoveries, but I'm pretty sure it's a lot lower than that. A lot of people are still in hospitals, and I think we can presume a large proportion of those will eventually die.
To: aristeides; FITZ; per loin
I think that the number of recoveries listed are about the same as the number of deaths...I'm not sure, though...
To: aristeides; Judith Anne
I still think something else is going on. Common colds ---some of which are coronaviruses spread a lot faster ---I can talk to someone in one state one day and they say there's a cold or flu going around and by the next day I find out I've got it too --- Colds and Flus quickly infect millions within weeks --- it seems this SARS is slow moving if anything.
49
posted on
05/03/2003 8:38:59 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
Okay.
To: FITZ
Fitz as you can see less than half have recovered. As a matter of fact 56% haven't.
Country |
Cumulative number of case(s)2 |
Number of new cases since last WHO update2 |
Number of deaths |
Number recovered3 |
Date last probable case reported |
Date for which cumulative number of cases is current |
Australia |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
23/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Brazil |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10/Apr/2003 |
24/Apr/2003 |
Bulgaria |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24/Apr/2003 |
28/Apr/2003 |
Canada |
149 |
2 |
22 |
93 |
1/May/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
China |
3799 |
176 |
181 |
1372 |
2/May/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region4 |
1611 |
11 |
170 |
878 |
2/May/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
China, Macao Special Administrative Region |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30/Apr/2003 |
30/Apr/2003 |
China, Taiwan |
100 |
11 |
8 |
25 |
2/May/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
France |
5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
11/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Germany |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
22/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Indonesia |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23/Apr/2003 |
30/Apr/2003 |
Italy |
9 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
29/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Kuwait |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9/Apr/2003 |
20/Apr/2003 |
Malaysia |
6 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
28/Apr/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
Mongolia |
8 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1/May/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
New Zealand |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
30/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Philippines |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
28/Apr/2003 |
29/Apr/2003 |
Poland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1/May/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
Republic of Ireland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21/Mar/2003 |
24/Apr/2003 |
Republic of Korea |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Romania |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
27/Mar/2003 |
22/Apr/2003 |
Singapore |
203 |
2 |
25 |
146 |
2/May/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
South Africa |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9/Apr/2003 |
9/Apr/2003 |
Spain |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2/Apr/2003 |
24/Apr/2003 |
Sweden |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
18/Apr/2003 |
23/Apr/2003 |
Switzerland |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17/Mar/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
Thailand |
7 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
12/Apr/2003 |
30/Apr/2003 |
United Kingdom |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
11/Apr/2003 |
1/May/2003 |
United States |
56 |
2 |
0 |
24 |
30/Apr/2003 |
30/Apr/2003 |
Viet Nam |
63 |
0 |
5 |
56 |
14/Apr/2003 |
2/May/2003 |
Total |
6054 |
207 |
417 |
2643 |
enough that you won't die before your immune system kicks in which takes a couple weeks.
Dude it is your immune system THAT KILLS you!
51
posted on
05/03/2003 8:46:17 AM PDT
by
Nov3
To: Judith Anne; All
To: Judith Anne
SARS Mortality Rates [reflects treatment] Based on World Health Organization daily tables (Revised: 5/03am) |
Area |
Recoveries to date |
Deaths to date |
Recent** Death Rate |
|
Active Cases still in Danger |
Projected Future Deaths |
Projected Cumulative Mortality |
Hong Kong |
878 |
170 |
17.2% |
|
563 |
97 |
16.6% |
Singapore |
146 |
25 |
23.1% |
|
32 |
7 |
15.8% |
China |
1372 |
181 |
41.0% |
|
2246 |
921 |
29.0% |
Canada |
93 |
22 |
26.9% |
|
34 |
9 |
20.8% |
elsewhere [26 countries] |
154 |
19 |
18.8% |
|
119 |
22 |
14.0% |
World-wide [all 30 countries] |
2643 |
417 |
|
|
2994 |
1056 |
24.3% |
** ( Deaths in the last 7 days) / ( Deaths + Recoveries in the last 7 days) |
Trend - Active Cases Still in Danger [reflects containment] |
Date |
Hong Kong |
Singapore |
China |
Canada |
elsewhere 26 countries |
World-wide all 30 countries |
Apr 19 |
914 |
61 |
307 |
62 |
|
1616 |
Apr 20 |
893 |
64 |
497 |
65 |
|
1694 |
Apr 21 (est.) |
872 |
66 |
686 |
66 |
|
1771 |
Apr 22 |
874 |
60 |
708 |
61 |
80 |
1783 |
Apr 23 |
831 |
58 |
968 |
62 |
86 |
2005 |
Apr 24 |
812 |
55 |
1058 |
58 |
76 |
2059 |
Apr 25 |
781 |
50 |
1209 |
51 |
78 |
2169 |
Apr 26 |
774 |
51 |
1346 |
47 |
86 |
2304 |
Apr 27 (est.) |
738 |
45 |
1415 |
47 |
98 |
2336 |
Apr 28 |
709 |
39 |
1484 |
47 |
108 |
2387 |
Apr 29 |
663 |
38 |
1833 |
40 |
108 |
2682 |
Apr 30 |
641 |
38 |
1969 |
41 |
132 |
2821 |
May 1 |
604 |
33 |
2117 |
40 |
117 |
2911 |
May 2 |
563 |
32 |
2246 |
34 |
119 |
2994 |
(includes new daily cases... excludes cases resolved by death or recovery) |
Observations:
- Treatment:
- The 'elsewhere' 26 countries as a whole, had a VERY bad day
with 5 new deaths and only 6 new recoveries...
(a 45% one-day death rate) - Almost everyone's (except Hong Kong's) 7-day death rates rose again.
- These pushed the overall projected Mortality to
another new record high: 24.3%
- Containment:
- No major changes. China still has little or no apparent containment.
Here is a COOL " Interactive guide - The spread of Sars"
To: blam; jonathonandjennifer; Mr. Mulliner; Prince Charles; Dog Gone; thinktwice; eggman; Betty Jo; ...
SARS - Treatment/Containment tables - update ping
To: FL_engineer; All
Interesting how the number of active cases has dropped substantially in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Canada, risen slightly in the rest of the world, but risen massively in Red China. Using the Chicoms' figures, 75% of the active cases are now in Red China. Since their figures are almost certainly still too low, the true percentage is undoubtedly even higher than that.
To: Nov3
How many people besides those showing symptoms have had a SARS antibody titer performed on their blood? Do we really know that the cases listed are the only ones there have been? What if some people felt a little under the weather, didn't go to the doctor, didn't get treated but got better and it was really SARS?
56
posted on
05/03/2003 8:59:45 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: neither-nor; All
To: aristeides
The only times most SARS victims have been infected in hospitals is when that is the only place they COULD be infected. In a good isolation/quarantine system, that is the way it is SUPPOSED to work.
The initial worldwide spread was not through hospitals. Most SARS victims in China were NOT infected in hospitals. Most SARS victims even in Hong Kong were not infected in hospitals (although a lot were).
58
posted on
05/03/2003 9:05:02 AM PDT
by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever.)
To: FL_engineer
Good info, thanks.
59
posted on
05/03/2003 9:08:05 AM PDT
by
blam
To: aristeides
Is the growth exponential anywhere besides China?I included all cases world wide.
60
posted on
05/03/2003 9:10:40 AM PDT
by
Nebullis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson