Skip to comments.
Bush's war gain is Democrats' pain (LAUGH ALERT)
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| May 4, 2003
| WILLIAM O'ROURKE
Posted on 05/04/2003 4:19:05 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: Chi-townChief
No longer is there a need to ask. I know why. Sorry, but this dude doesn't know squat
21
posted on
05/04/2003 6:57:14 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
To: Chi-townChief
It is clear that his tax cuts exist not just to give money to the rich, but to take services away from the poor for ideological reasons Let's see...a $2.2 TRILLION budget representing out-of-control spending increases across the board means that services are taken away from the poor. Of COURSE!! And the Dems in Congress who voted for it share none of the blame. Baghdad is alive and well and writing for his new employer the Chicago Sun-Times. Bob, meet Roger Ebert, your new partner and ideological soulmate.
22
posted on
05/04/2003 7:22:17 PM PDT
by
WhaChuLookinAt
(As a matter of fact, I DO put my pants on both legs at a time.)
To: Chi-townChief
It is clear that his tax cuts exist not just to give money to the rich, but to take services away from the poor for ideological reasons Let's see...a $2.2 TRILLION budget representing out-of-control spending increases across the board means that services are taken away from the poor. Of COURSE!! And the Dems in Congress who voted for it share none of the blame. Baghdad Bob is alive and well and writing for his new employer the Chicago Sun-Times. Bob, meet Roger Ebert, your new partner and ideological soulmate.
23
posted on
05/04/2003 7:22:28 PM PDT
by
WhaChuLookinAt
(As a matter of fact, I DO put my pants on both legs at a time.)
To: WhaChuLookinAt
Pardon the double-post. Thought I'd caught the first one in time.
24
posted on
05/04/2003 7:23:09 PM PDT
by
WhaChuLookinAt
(As a matter of fact, I DO put my pants on both legs at a time.)
To: DallasMike
You hit point after point right on their head. It won't matter to the writer who I'm sure knows about all this and was just trying to spread disinformation. But BS does not go through FR unchecked!
To: Chi-townChief
"On Sept. 10, 2001, half of his administration was implicated in the corporate scandals that were finally getting their moment in the sun."
Excuse me, proof, evidence, please verify outlandish foolhardy statements.
26
posted on
05/04/2003 7:59:21 PM PDT
by
harpo11
(Godspeed Brave USA Troops! My Families Thoughts and Prayers are Being Sent to YOU! "Job Well Done!)
To: DallasMike
Good job!!!
27
posted on
05/04/2003 8:57:17 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(Piety is only skin deep, but hypocrisy goes clear to the soul.)
To: DallasMike
Great letter to O'Rourke, Michael...Go get 'em!
28
posted on
05/05/2003 2:02:24 AM PDT
by
Susannah
(Reformed Democrat of the 70's)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson