Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Credit where Credit is Due: the Republicans passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Back to Basics for the Republican Party ^ | May 8, 2003 | Michael Zak

Posted on 05/08/2003 5:19:37 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan

Credit Where Credit Is Due: The Republicans Passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act

by Michael Zak

During the Kennedy administration, the Republican minority in Congress introduced many bills to protect the constitutional rights of blacks, including a comprehensive new civil rights bill. In February 1963, to head off a return by most blacks to the party of Lincoln, Kennedy abruptly decided to submit to Congress a new civil rights bill. Hastily drafted in a single all-nighter, the Kennedy bill fell well short of what our Party had introduced into Congress the month before. Over the next several months, Democrat racists in Congress geared up for a protracted filibuster against the civil rights bill. The bill was before a committee in the House of Representatives when John Kennedy was murdered in November 1963.

Invoking his slain predecessor, Lyndon Johnson made passage of the bill his top priority, and in his first speech to Congress he urged Representatives and Senators to do "more for civil rights than the last hundred sessions combined". Though he shared Johnson’s convictions on safeguarding the constitutional rights of blacks, if Nixon had been in the White House then instead, Democrats in favor of segregation and those unwilling to see a Republican achieve the victory would have blocked his legislative initiative in Congress.

The 1964 Civil Rights Act was an update of Republican Senator Charles Sumner’s 1875 Civil Rights Act. In striking down that law in 1883, the Supreme Court had ruled that the 14th amendment was not sufficient constitutional authorization, so the 1964 version had to be written in such a way as to rely instead on the interstate commerce clause for its constitutional underpinning.

Mindful of how Democrat opposition had forced the Republicans to weaken their 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts, President Johnson warned Democrats in Congress that this time it was all or nothing. To ensure support from Republicans, he had to promise them that he would not accept any weakening of the bill and also that he would publicly credit our Party for its role in securing congressional approval. Johnson played no direct role in the legislative fight, so that it would not be perceived as a partisan struggle. There was no doubt that the House of Representatives would pass the bill.

In the Senate, Minority Leader Everett Dirksen had little trouble rounding up the votes of most Republicans, and former presidential candidate Richard Nixon also lobbied hard for the bill. Senate Majority Leader Michael Mansfield and Senator Hubert Humphrey led the Democrat drive for passage, while the chief opponents were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, of later Watergate fame, Albert Gore Sr., and Robert Byrd. Senator Byrd, a former Klansman whom Democrats still call "the conscience of the Senate", filibustered against the civil rights bill for fourteen straight hours before the final vote. The House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 126, a vote in which 79% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voted yes. The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats and only 6 Republicans voting no. President Johnson signed the new Civil Rights Act into law on July 2, 1964.

Overall, there was little overt resistance to the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The struggle was not yet over, however, as most southern state governments remained under the control of segregationist Democrats. It was a Republican federal judge who was most responsible for desegregating the South’s public schools. Appointed by President Eisenhower in 1955, Frank Johnson had overturned Montgomery, Alabama’s infamous “blacks in the back of the bus” law in his very first decision. During the 1960s, Judge Johnson continued to advance civil rights despite opposition from George Wallace, Lester Maddox, and other Democrat Governors.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1964; byrd; civilrights; democrat; gop; gore; lyndon; michaelzak; nixon; republican
This essay is adapted from "Back to Basics for the Republican Party" (3rd ed.), Michael Zak’s history of the Grand Old Party from the Republican point of view. See http://www.republicanbasics.com for more information about the book.
1 posted on 05/08/2003 5:19:38 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
are they finally giving us credit for something after only 40 years?
2 posted on 05/08/2003 5:21:48 AM PDT by Mr. K (I'm formidable with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
"the chief opponents were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin...Albert Gore Sr., and Robert Byrd. Senator Byrd, a former Klansman whom Democrats still call "the conscience of the Senate", filibustered against the civil rights bill for fourteen straight hours"

"I'll have them n------ votin' Democrat for the next 200 years."
~Democrat Lyndon Johnson

3 posted on 05/08/2003 5:30:11 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
"It was a Republican federal judge who was most responsible for desegregating the South’s public schools."

Democrats will say or do anything to get elected and stay in power.

clinton
(democrat)
carter
(democrat)
johnson
(democrat)

Thank God that Republican George Bush was President on September 11, 2001, and thereafter and that he is President now.

BUSH
(Republican)
LINCOLN
(Republican)
JEFFERSON
WASHINGTON

4 posted on 05/08/2003 5:49:25 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grand Old Partisan
I don't know if I'd use the word "credit". It was a major unconstitutional power grab by the federal government, and it's having a very deleterious effect on our society - no, not because "undesirable" people are getting a leg up, but because it's become a lawyers' treasure trove, and because it allows people to avoid responsibility for themselves: "You're not really firing me because I'm incompetent/have a bad attitude/can't speak English/etc.; you're firing me because I'm [fill in protected ethnic group here]."
5 posted on 05/08/2003 9:22:09 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson