Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FR EXCLUSIVE: INTERVIEW WITH HIGH LEVEL NAVY COMMANDER REGARDING PRESIDENT BUSH'S TAILHOOK LANDING
a Navy commander | May 9., 2003 | dfu

Posted on 05/09/2003 1:56:27 PM PDT by doug from upland

After listening to the rantings and ravings of the DemocRATS who are both jealous and livid after seeing a beloved commander in chief do a tailhook landing on the USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN, I wanted to get the real story.

After about 5 calls and transfers and return calls, I just spoke with a Navy commander who deals with public relations. He is very high level, but because this issue is so sensitive, I agreed that I would not use his name.

When asked whether the visit of the president delayed the arrival of the Lincoln, the answer was a resounding "Absolutely not!" The Lincoln arrived when it was scheduled to arrive. Ships slow down and speed up all the time.

The Navy does not have its ships land early. No. It is just not done. It is a logistical nightmare. Tugs and other port services have to be arranged. In 1991, the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT arrived 20 hours early off the coast of Virginia. It sat out there looking at land for 20 hours. And they never come to port at night.

There were 20-25,000 families and friends expecting to watch the return of the ship and greet their loved ones.

"Psychologically," said the commander, "it would have been a nightmare. People made plane reservations, hotel reservations, long trips by car. Imagine what it would have been like for them to arrive to meet there loved ones, but it turned out that they came a day late for the event. We would have had 20-25,000 people really angry with the U.S. Navy."

The commander gave me his worst scenario for a public relations nightmare. It would be a grandma who drove all the way from Des Moines to see her grandson arrive, only to be told that she didn't make it in time; that they decided to come to port early. What do they say to her?

The commander is amazed at this flap, which has been totally invented by the media. This should be a non-issue with them. Some in the media were sworn to silence, and they were given the May 2 date about 3-4 weeks ago. They knew it would be coming to port at that time. At the appropriate time, the crew and families were notified. You just do not change the date.

As to the landing on a Viking rather than Marine One. The costs are roughly the same. Fuel and other costs for that Viking were already allocated and spent. If the President was not aboard that plane, it would have made a landing on the ship anyway. It would have done so sooner or later because it was in the budget to do it.

What has been lost in all of this, according to the commander, is that it was the Navy's idea for the President to come aboard and make a tailhook landing. They opted for an F-18. Because of security, however, the White House opted for the Viking, a 4-seater which could accommodate Secret Service.

"We would do this again," said the commander. "Ever since President Franklin Roosevelt, every president has landed aboard a Navy ship."

We finished with a laugh at the media. Members of congress and journalists are flown in and not charged. And these are the people creating an issue where none should exist.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carrierbush; lincoln; navy; navyone; tailhook; wonderful
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-253 next last
To: Miss Marple
LOLOLROTF, it's obvious the flight suit was not custom made......the pants were too short!
141 posted on 05/09/2003 5:52:59 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I retired from the navy last year and all of what you say is true. The Navy is always doing things to promote its self, including taking congress critters and other high and even low profile people on VIP Cruises and such. Great for crew moral, they are recognized and the crew gets to show their stuff.
142 posted on 05/09/2003 5:59:34 PM PDT by SolitaryMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I feel certain someone has probably brought this up before, but I for one would be pleased if a new tradition was started, similar to the "Ann Coulter Rule".
Any thread about President Bush must include a gratuitous photo of him wearing a flightsuit.
I promise to learn how to post images, should this rule become standard.
I know it may not be entirely proper, as my daughter rebuked me and said I should not say GWB looked incredibly good in a flightsuit,
her exact words were "Mom, that's gross,he is the President and you shouldnt think about him being cute or sexy".
I feel very lucky that she is only 8, and has no idea the former presidents' major legacy for children was to casually introduce "oral sex" into their vocabulary.


143 posted on 05/09/2003 6:01:21 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France.Ignore Germany.Forgive Russia...Free Israel from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna
I am breathlessly waiting for the President to visit the Reagan when it is ready to roll..........

Oh my, the dems will be shooting themselves in the head again!!!

144 posted on 05/09/2003 6:02:57 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Don't know about the media, but when the ship was about ten miles from shore, the President walked on in!!!!
145 posted on 05/09/2003 6:04:19 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
LOL! Here is a picture, and I will freepmail you directions on how to post pictures:
146 posted on 05/09/2003 6:05:16 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Great work doug.

Personally, I WANT the Dimbulbs to whine everyday. Even "liberals" I know are dismayed at their constant sniping.

The more and more they whine and whine, the more and more decent Americans see them for what they are: worthless pieces of dog feces.

Wait, I take that back - dog feces has more worth.

147 posted on 05/09/2003 6:09:11 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Can you say "50 state landslide"? Sure ya can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
How about Bobby Byrd's Klan robe.
148 posted on 05/09/2003 6:14:03 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Great picture of blatherin' Terry finally cracking up.
149 posted on 05/09/2003 6:16:51 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (FReepers discover the TRUTH, and distribute it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: aquawrench
Here's the thing, the Rats know that there's something wrong with everything Bush does. Doesn't matter if it's landing on an aircraft carrier or using the john. The thing that bothers them is that it's not a Democrat doing it.
150 posted on 05/09/2003 6:17:01 PM PDT by POGIFFMOO (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
How (& when) did W (and the media et. al.) get off the Lincoln?

The next day, when the carrier was closer to land, they all took helicopters to shore.

151 posted on 05/09/2003 6:19:34 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
journalists are flown in and not charged

Well, maybe this needs to be changed.

152 posted on 05/09/2003 6:20:08 PM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
A great letter from a real man from West Virginia, not that whining/carping KKKer Byrd. Byrd has never apologized for being KKKer, and I don't he has ever officially said that he was no longer a KKKer.
153 posted on 05/09/2003 6:22:41 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Free Republic, where leftist liars are exposed 24/7!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Here is a picture, and I will freepmail you directions on how to post pictures:

Oh, no! Please don't propagate that method! I don't know what it is, but it doesn't allow me to see the pix on my lowly iMac.
I can see most pix, but some method being propagated on FR is not viewable to me, and I'd like to see the others used more (of course!)

154 posted on 05/09/2003 6:25:44 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The commander is amazed at this flap, which has been totally invented by the media.

Hey, it's showbiz...not news. The media always seeks drama, i.e., conflict and tension. Hence objectivity and accuracy take a back seat.

155 posted on 05/09/2003 6:26:45 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
In 1991, the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT arrived 20 hours early off the coast of Virginia. It sat out there looking at land for 20 hours. And they never come to port at night.

I can attest to that. My youngest son was aboard the TR, returning from the Gulf War in June of 1991 and I was aware of the docking date for two weeks. Unfortunately, circumstances kept me from greeting him, but two of my other sons did - on schedule, on time.

I believe that the DemocRATs are going to rue the day that they took on the Commander in Chief on this issue. Big Time.

156 posted on 05/09/2003 6:27:03 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
Test pcture:

Can you see this picture? If so, the method I use works for you.

157 posted on 05/09/2003 6:28:01 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: jackbill
But of course, they wouldn't want the Commander in Chief to command. They're trying to find a way to make the execution of his job an abuse of power. That's because any time a Democrat is in this position they abuse their power. Hmmmm, should we be surprised?
158 posted on 05/09/2003 6:31:43 PM PDT by POGIFFMOO (illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I cant see it. Just a box with a red x in it.
159 posted on 05/09/2003 6:35:12 PM PDT by sarasmom (Punish France.Ignore Germany.Forgive Russia...Free Israel from terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

160 posted on 05/09/2003 6:35:32 PM PDT by Just Another Lurker (I'll go back to sitting in my corner now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson