Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FreeperRedux is Zotted
James Redford

Posted on 05/10/2003 9:59:15 AM PDT by FreeperRedux

Edited on 05/10/2003 10:23:41 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Click the picture


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anarchism; anarchist; antichristian; christian; christianity; clintonshowmexxxx; clymer; crackpot; deceiver; dowhatthouwilt; dummycrats; dusrupter; fool; garofalofan; hillaryforpresident; hubelldidit; liberallibertine; newbietroll; religion; satanic; strikeupthebanned; thechildren; thisaccountbanned; warondrugs; wod; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2003 9:59:17 AM PDT by FreeperRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
Anarchism is incompatible with conservatism, and is not welcome here. Go push your twiddle over on infoshop or indymedia. Thanks, AM
2 posted on 05/10/2003 10:04:26 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
This is past sick.....I think it should be removed, but that's just my opinion.
3 posted on 05/10/2003 10:09:47 AM PDT by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
Nonsense. Jesus, as the King, is a Monarch.
4 posted on 05/10/2003 10:11:37 AM PDT by Guyin4Os
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Why not just pull the whole post. Longest vanity I have seen and most worthless.
5 posted on 05/10/2003 10:12:31 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
okay, i admit, i didn't read the article. but when i read the headline, one quote from Christ rang in my head:

"Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s" (Matt. 22:21)

6 posted on 05/10/2003 10:12:49 AM PDT by TheMightyQuinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
I agree. It is beyond sick.

I thought about zotting it, and I thought about pulling it.

But you know what? It is an offensive ideology, and letting people see it for what it is just might have a benefit.

That's my current inclination, although I could be persuaded differently.

7 posted on 05/10/2003 10:13:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
God (Christian) is an anarchist?
8 posted on 05/10/2003 10:13:51 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: KeyWest
I explained a bit above. If I am wrong, let me know.
10 posted on 05/10/2003 10:15:46 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
Maybe you should have just directed everybody to buy the book instead of publishing it.
11 posted on 05/10/2003 10:16:07 AM PDT by babylonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
Where is James Redford's church? Who is he?
12 posted on 05/10/2003 10:17:55 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
A quick ZOT, eh?
13 posted on 05/10/2003 10:18:02 AM PDT by babaloo999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babylonian
Bump for summer vacation
14 posted on 05/10/2003 10:18:22 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux

I think I read about...five words, and then PgDn'ed the rest of the way. I don't need a headache. Could this be summed up in say, one sentence? ;)

15 posted on 05/10/2003 10:19:45 AM PDT by Pyrion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyrion
I can sum it up in one word.

ZOT!!!!

16 posted on 05/10/2003 10:21:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Guyin4Os
I think He was apolitical - He was not political at all...did he not tell slaves to be good slaves in Ephesians? I don't think He beleived in slavery, He was just not going to challange the politics of the time because that's not why He was here.
18 posted on 05/10/2003 10:26:51 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Who is he?


19 posted on 05/10/2003 10:27:14 AM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
LOL!

I prefer the late Redux's thread click, simply because brevity is the soul of...... something or other, and this screed is a migraine-maker. Is Redux kin to NYCBob who posted a one-line vanity with an out-of-context Bible verse yesterday? If so, he's gone from short and mysterious to verbose and unintelligible.

20 posted on 05/10/2003 10:28:14 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
That's my current inclination, although I could be persuaded differently.

Good thing I waited....I was gonna offer you five bucks.

21 posted on 05/10/2003 10:28:51 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum (I'm changing my tag line....somebody hand that wench....no...the blonde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
44 pages and 25,000 words... that's gotta require one heck of a big ZOT!
22 posted on 05/10/2003 10:29:15 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babylonian
LOL
23 posted on 05/10/2003 10:29:28 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pyrion
I scanned the article, and found the keyword I was looking for. "Hitler". Once an article uses Hitler, Nazi's or National Socialism to make a point I quit reading it and forget the whole thing. Why? Because Nazism has become an intellectual "black box", an optimum launching pad for any ex cathedra statement the author wants to make. Any loathsome act, belief or policy can be attributed to the Nazis, and nobody will dare to say if it is not true.

For example, one could claim "Hitler ate Jewish babies brains for breakfast", and everyone would just say "yes, those Nazis were sure evil". But if someone were to say "that seems wrong to me, as I understand it Hitler was a vegetarian" then everyone will attack this person as being a Nazi for daring to defend Hitler. See how it works?

As a result, I quickly scan all articles for the keywords "Hitler", "Nazi", and "National Socialism". Once I find those words, I discard the article. I am sick of lazy thinkers using Hitler to sell their snake oil.
24 posted on 05/10/2003 10:30:02 AM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I don't have the time right now to read the whole thing, but I note this statement:

Above I also stated that Jesus's commandment of the Golden Rule not only proves that He is an anarchist, but also necessarily a libertarian, or free market, anarchist to be specific.

So this doesn't appear to be the left-wing type of anarchism, but the right-wing, pro-free market, anarcho-capitalist type.

As much as I adore the Viking Kitties, this may have been a bit quick on the Zot. At least, I suspect indymedia and other left-wing sites wouldn't be enamored of it, either.

25 posted on 05/10/2003 10:30:06 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
A Zot gets you banned or suspended? Hmmm... I wonder if he will lurk and read how his thread transpires, and if he will be pleased with the results?
26 posted on 05/10/2003 10:31:57 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
It is an offensive ideology, and letting people see it for what it is just might have a benefit.

IMHO it is simply too lengthy for most people to grasp, their eyes will glaze over first.
Still, it is a good example of someone with waaaaaaay too much free time on their hands.
One wonders how they can even compose such drivel without putting themselves to sleep.

27 posted on 05/10/2003 10:32:13 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
Anarchism is not welcome here. Period.
28 posted on 05/10/2003 10:32:15 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux
Extremely poor philosophy, laughably poor politics, woefully poor Christianity.

This is simply the self-government thing taken to its logical, er, illogical conclusion. This delusional individual doesn't understand, nor do dyed-inthe-wool Libertarians, that a train is only free to go where it needs to go as long as it runs on a track. To be free of the restraint placed upon it would cause its certain destruction. Libertines and anarchists would have that train break "free" and thus crash and burn.

Jesus Christ was not an anarchist. He was a theocrat, himself being the Deity. His followers are to live before Him as in theocracy, and before their fellow human beings in submission to government insofar as that government does not conflict with the theocracy.

This writer's take on the Golden Rule reminds me of Wiccans whose guiding principle is "An' it harm none, do as ye will" which sounds great at first until you begin to ask, how do I know that what I will is not going to harm someone? Define "harm"? Then you realize how absurd is the whole concept of everyone just making it up as they go, doing whatever is "right for them". The Book of Judges is the OT is a good example: "And everyone did that which was right in his own eyes" and it, of all the books in the Bible, is filled with the most viciousness and cruelty.
29 posted on 05/10/2003 10:33:02 AM PDT by Scothia (Proudly eschewing the flaky, antifamily feminist establishment since 1973.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
This article is long-winded, and some of the logic is flawed, IMO, but there are many good thoughts presented in it. The person who wrote this article is not a blind, shallow parrot, and that is rare and refreshing.

Why are we so afraid of certain words? Stop "thinking" so emotionally.

30 posted on 05/10/2003 10:33:12 AM PDT by agrandis (What kind of nation sends its women into combat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
Warning!
Another 500+ post thread in the making!
31 posted on 05/10/2003 10:33:39 AM PDT by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Jesus...a zot!
32 posted on 05/10/2003 10:33:42 AM PDT by woofie (I want a cabal too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: agrandis
The person who wrote this article is not a blind, shallow parrot...

No - but he is a mental patient. Click on the link I provided above to see what this guy is about.

33 posted on 05/10/2003 10:36:52 AM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: agrandis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/909160/posts?page=28#28
34 posted on 05/10/2003 10:37:09 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux

BOOOOMMM!
35 posted on 05/10/2003 10:37:22 AM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofie
I respectfully disagree with the decision to Zot this person. It's not like he was pushing Demopuke philosophy or an article praising Hillary. He posted an article on religion for discussion. We then have an opportunity to see what unusual opinions there are floating in the stratosphere, and respond accordingly.

The Lord Jesus Christ inspires strong opinions, doesn't He ?! (smile)

36 posted on 05/10/2003 10:40:08 AM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
A zot is far worse than a zit
37 posted on 05/10/2003 10:41:01 AM PDT by woofie (I want a cabal too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/909160/posts?page=28#28
38 posted on 05/10/2003 10:42:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
I think Jesus was much more revoltionary than a revolutionary however
39 posted on 05/10/2003 10:43:49 AM PDT by woofie (I want a cabal too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
What did he type? Now I want to read it...If you're gonna zot something, get rid of it so we freepers just signing on won't be wondering what it was that was so controversial.
40 posted on 05/10/2003 10:43:53 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
here is the original for everyone curious The ZOT!"ed" post
41 posted on 05/10/2003 10:45:02 AM PDT by Capitalism2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
I love it when a Zot comes together!
42 posted on 05/10/2003 10:46:30 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Zot all you will, but Redux's two offerings today didn't need to be burnt. They stood as steaming......er.... memorials to DUfer 'thought'.

This particular thread was a prime example which reminded me of Bill Clinton's 3+ hour speech at the DNC convention in Atlanta, 1988, ranked as possibly the world's most boring event ever in prime time.

43 posted on 05/10/2003 10:49:05 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FreeperRedux; Admin Moderator; Dark Glasses and Corncob Pipe
Redford's article, understandably deleted, is one of the most asinine articles I have ever seen.
44 posted on 05/10/2003 10:51:37 AM PDT by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheMightyQuinn
"Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s" (Matt. 22:21)

Popped into my head, as well.

45 posted on 05/10/2003 10:53:05 AM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The FRugitive
Exactly. He wasn't about the temporal, but the spiritual. What does government have to do with one's eternal soul?
46 posted on 05/10/2003 10:55:00 AM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
"That's my current inclination, although I could be persuaded differently."

Surprise! An admin Mod who makes decisions while lacking conviction.

I must admit that I have not read one word of the material in question, so bring on the retorts.
47 posted on 05/10/2003 10:59:48 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billhilly
You are right. I should act more decisively, such as Jim did with RedBaiter2 years ago.
48 posted on 05/10/2003 11:04:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: KeyWest
I was thinking it was the longest post period.
49 posted on 05/10/2003 11:06:13 AM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; FreeperRedux
We come from the Land of Ice and Snow...

Ahh Ahhh Ahhhhhhhhh!

50 posted on 05/10/2003 11:08:47 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (French: old Europe word meaning surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson