Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US rivals turn on each other as weapons search draws a blank
The Observer ^ | 5/11/03 | Paul Harris and Martin Bright

Posted on 05/10/2003 5:29:55 PM PDT by Ranger

One key argument for war was the peril from weapons of mass destruction. Now top officials are worried by repeated failures to find the proof - and US intelligence agencies are engaged in a struggle to avoid the blame



The Iraqi military base at Taji does not look like a place of global importance. It is a desolate expanse of bunkers and hangars surrounded by barbed wire and battered look-out posts. It is deserted apart from American sentries at the gate.

Yet Taji, north of Baghdad, is the key to a furious debate. Where are Saddam's weapons of mass destruction? Was the war fought on a platform of lies? Taji was the only specific location singled out by Secretary of State Colin Powell in his address to the UN when he argued that evidence compiled by US intelligence proved the existence of an illegal weapons programme. 'This is one of 65 such facilities in Iraq,' Powell said. 'We know this one has housed chemical weapons.'

But The Observer has learnt that Taji has drawn a blank. US sources say no such weapons were found when a search party scoured the base in late April. By then it had already been looted by local villagers. If Taji ever had any secrets, they are long gone. That is bad news for Britain and the United States. The pressure is building to find Saddam's hidden arsenal and time is running out.

Last week the US flew 2,000 more experts into Iraq. The Iraq Survey Team will join 600 experts already there. Organisations in Iraq hunting for weapons now include teams from the US and British armies, the CIA, the FBI and the Defence Threat Reduction Agency. Yet at more than 110 sites checked so far they have found nothing conclusive. It has been an exercise in false alarms. Suspect white powder at Latifiyah was only explosives. Barrels of what was thought to be sarin and tabun nerve agents were pesticides. When a dozen US soldiers checked a suspect site and fell ill, it was because they had inhaled fertiliser fumes. Each setback ratchets up the political pressure. Infighting between government departments and intelligence agencies is becoming vicious on both sides of the Atlantic. Having fought a war to disarm Iraq of its terrible weapons, neither the US nor Britain can admit that Iraq never had them in the first place. The search for weapons of mass destruction cannot be allowed to fail.

The search is especially vital for The Cabal. In the brave new world of post-11 September America, this tight group of analysts deep in the heart of the Pentagon has been the driving force behind the war in Iraq. Numbering no more than a dozen, The Cabal is part of the Office of Special Plans, a new intelligence agency which has taken on the CIA and won. Where the CIA dithered over Iraq, the OSP pressed on. Where the CIA doubted, the OSP was firm. It fought a battle royal over Iraq and George Bush came down on its side.

The OSP is the brainchild of Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who set it up after the 2001 terrorist attacks. It was tasked with going over old ground on Iraq and showing that the CIA had overlooked the threat posed. But its rise has caused massive ructions in the normally secretive world of intelligence gathering.

The OSP reports directly to Paul Wolfowitz, a leading hawk in the administration. They bypassed the CIA and the Pentagon's own Defence Intelligence Agency when it came to whispering in the President's ear. They argued a forceful case for war against Saddam before his weapons programmes came to fruition. More moderate voices in the CIA and DIA were drowned out. The result has been a flurry of leaks to the US press. One CIA official described The Cabal's members as 'crazed', on a 'mission from God'.

But for the moment The Cabal and Rumsfeld's Pentagon have won and Powell's doveish State Department has lost. Tensions between the two are now in the open.

'Rumsfeld set up his own intelligence agency because he didn't like the intelligence he was getting,' said Larry Korb, director of national security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. 'He doesn't like Powell's approach, a typical diplomat, too cautious.'

Former CIA officials are caustic about the OSP. Unreliable and politically motivated, they say it has undermined decades of work by the CIA's trained spies and ignored the truth when it has contradicted its world view.

'Their methods are vicious,' said Vince Cannistraro, former CIA chief of counter-terrorism. 'The politicisation of intelligence is pandemic, and deliberate disinformation is being promoted. They choose the worst-case scenario on everything and so much of the information is fallacious.' But Cannistraro is retired. His attacks will not bother The Cabal, firmly 'in the loop' of Washington's movers and shakers. Yet, even among them, continued failure to find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is a growing fear. The fallout from the war could bring them down.

The warning was there in black and white. Citing 'intelligence' sources, Tony Blair produced an official dossier that concluded Iraq could fire its chemical or biological weapons within 45 minutes of an order to do so.

It was a terrifying prospect and ramped up the pro-war argument when the dossier was produced last September. But cold analysis after the war tells a different story.

Iraq was abandoned by the UN weapons inspectors, then bombed, invaded and finally brought under US and British military control. During that entire time the 'button' was never pressed on its weapons of mass destruction. Now both the pro-war party and the anti-war lobby want to know why. Can this mysterious lapse be explained or did the weapons never exist?

They could have been hidden. Iraq is the size of California with mountains and deserts in abundance. Ibrahim al-Marashi, an Iraqi expert whose work was heavily plagiarised in a now infamous Downing Street dossier published on the eve of war, has detailed a sophisticated concealment network set up in the 1990s and headed by Saddam's son Qusay. At the heart of the operation was Saddam's son-in-law and cousin, Hussein Kamil, who defected in 1995 to Jordan, where he revealed the concealment techniques to Western intelligence agencies.

But, according to al-Marashit, the main cache of weapons of mass destruction should have been found in Saddam's home city of Tikrit. But Tikrit has fallen and as yet nothing has been found, leaving US officials clutching at straws. Some have gone so far as to suggest that the weapons were hidden so well that the Iraqis themselves were unable to use them.

A more worrying possibility is that they were looted. Across Iraq - not just in Baghdad and Basra - practically every government and military facility was looted long before US or British troops were able to control them. It might be that the weapons are now on the black market. 'It means the weapons would now be proliferating, which is exactly what the war was meant to stop,' said Garth Whitty, a former weapons inspector in Iraq in the 1990s.

But there are problems with that argument. Barrels of nerve agent are not easy to sell. The war's critics point to a more obvious conclusion - in the run-up to the war the Iraqis were simply telling the truth. They had no weapons of mass destruction.

A massive picture of intelligence misuse has emerged. Aside from Downing Street's plagiarised dossier, there are allegations that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger. The documents that the accusation were based on were shown to be false by the International Atomic Energy Agency, but that had not stopped Britain and America warning of Saddam's nuclear threat. In fact, the forgeries were obvious. One Niger Minister, whose signature was on a document, had been out of office for a decade when the forgeries were produced. A US envoy sent to investigate the claims reported to the CIA in February 2002 that they were fakes. But the OSP and the White House ignored him.

Other selective use of intelligence occurred. Much was made of the OSP's body of Iraqi defectors, but they chose which defectors they wanted to listen to. Kamil's terrifying description of Iraq's capabilities in the early 1990s and its efforts to conceal its arsenal was touted as killer proof. The fact that Kamil also told his interrogators the weapons had later been ordered destroyed was suppressed.

Other defectors may have had their own agendas. Kamil described one, Dr Khidhir Hamza, as a 'professional liar' - but told US intelligence what it wanted to hear and said Iraq was close to building a nuclear bomb. No one now believes that. But Hamza has now returned to Iraq as part of a Pentagon team to rebuild the country, in charge of atomic energy. Kamil also returned to Iraq - but when Saddam was in power. He was executed.

Perhaps the most damning evidence is the lack of intelligence emerging from captured Iraqi officials. The list is impressive: Huda Ammash, known as 'Mrs Anthrax'; General Hossam Amin, responsi ble for talks with weapons inspectors; General Amir Saadi, Saddam's science adviser; General. Rashid al-Ubaidi, an arms adviser; and Abdul Hwaish, believed responsible for all Iraq's military capabilities. If anyone knows about the weapons, it is these people. They have powerful motivation to 'cut a deal' and tell what they know.'Why is no one coughing?' said Whitty.

In a quiet corner of Baghdad International Airport sits a truck and trailer painted military green. Its canvas sides have been rolled up to reveal the pipes and vats of some form of biological fermentation machine. It was stolen in Mosul two weeks ago then handed over to Kurdish militia when the thieves realised it was no ordinary truck. The Kurds passed it on to the Americans.

It is the only concrete sign that any weapons of mass destruction may have existed. The firm which made it has said six others were similarly kitted out. It has a strong resemblance to the 'mobile bio-weapons labs' described by Powell to the UN, but is it the smoking gun? Not even the most desperate Pentagon official goes that far. No trace of biological weapons residue has been found inside. The truck was apparently thoroughly cleaned out with bleach before it was stolen.

Yet many experts believe something will be found. Before the 1991 Gulf war, Iraq did have a massive chemical and biological weapons programme. Some is probably still lying around. If sufficient quantities can be uncovered, perhaps it will be enough for a public eager to feel the war was worth it. Finding nothing is unthinkable.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; cia; intelligence; iraq; iraqidefectors; officeofspecialplans; osp; postwariraq; taji; tikrit; warlist; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2003 5:29:56 PM PDT by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ranger
If sufficient quantities can be uncovered, perhaps it will be enough for a public eager to feel the war was worth it. Finding nothing is unthinkable.

Only to the Hate America Firsters. Polls show the vast majority of Americans say the war was the right thing to do even if WMDs are never uncovered.

2 posted on 05/10/2003 5:40:18 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
Last week the US flew 2,000 more experts into Iraq. The Iraq Survey Team will join 600 experts already there.

Hm. Of course, if Saddam didn't have WsMD as he claimed, why all the stonewalling & diversionary tactics sure to result in (as they did) his being, um, deposed? Or was he just trying to be the political equivalent of a suicide bomber?

(Should've been a barf alert on this?)

3 posted on 05/10/2003 5:41:51 PM PDT by Eala (The Left at work: "We don't see it as a 'quota', we see it as a 'performance standard'.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
One CIA official described The Cabal's members as 'crazed', on a 'mission from God'.
An unnamed "official," of course. And "CIA officials" always talk like this, about these things etc.

What a fascinating artifact. Disinformation masquerading as journalism at its most raw, most unsophisticated.
4 posted on 05/10/2003 5:43:19 PM PDT by Asclepius (as above, so below)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Ranger
The pressure is building to find Saddam's hidden arsenal and time is running out.

Time is running out? Who says? What, Dr. Germ is going to turn into a pumpkin at midnight? Pure press twaddle, that's what I think.

What really frosts me is that these media liberals think this all about playing 'gotcha.' If this stuff exists, and somebody else finds it before we do, Really Serious Stuff could happen. People could die. But to these jerks, it's all about "gotcha." What scum they are.


6 posted on 05/10/2003 5:58:14 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; *war_list; W.O.T.; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; blam; Sabertooth; ...
The Observer is working overtime to say Bush and Blair were wrong!

They were absolutely right!!!!!

Bush Doctrine Unfolds :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below:
  click here >>> Bush Doctrine Unfold <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



7 posted on 05/10/2003 6:02:01 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Iran will feel the heat from our Iraq victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranger
If weapons of mass destruction are not found, someone in the intellegence services who mislead this president, will pay the price. Count on it!
8 posted on 05/10/2003 6:08:26 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: mckenzie
"the USA govt lied (oh my goodness "say it ain't so joe") and got caught "

Not so fast. Shimmer dissolve to November, 1998, when the UNSCOM inspectors were withdrawn from Iraq so that Willie Clinton could play his little game of pre-impeachment "wag the dog".

When the inspectors were withdrawn, the had confirmed the existence of "tons of chemical weapons" and "thousands of liters of bioweapons".

Indeed, Blix' charge was not to discover new WMD so much as to find out what happened to those everybody knew Hussein had as recently as November, 1998.

Iraq claimed they had been destroyed -- but were unable to provide any documentation to that effect. Nor would they identify the site of the claimed destruction so that tests to confirm their assertions might be undertaken.

So, what do you think happened to them...???

10 posted on 05/10/2003 6:10:31 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mckenzie
Balderdash
11 posted on 05/10/2003 6:14:08 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
In my opinion, the issue is not was the war justified or was its outcome positive - it was. The Iraqi people are better of and the military victory was superb.

However, at this time the issue being posed is if there were, in fact, no WMD in Iraq, how could US intelligence have been so wrong?

Why is this so important? Because if our government plans on acting preemptively in the future, they had better do so based upon accurate intelligence information. If they don't, they are acting recklessly. There is no arguing that.
12 posted on 05/10/2003 6:14:42 PM PDT by JBBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: walkingman
Saddam flouted the very surrender agreement (that cost numerous Merkin lives).

Merkin lives?

The UN sanctions (along with precluding Iraqi possession of WMD's) ALSO included a respect for human rights, a fair and equitable distribution of Iraqi oil wealth, and an end to political hegemony by the Bathists.

There are also questions about our possession of WMD's, our respect for human rights, (particularly since we imprison more people proportionately than any other country) and our political hegemony by the Republicrats.

Regarding:

a fair and equitable distribution of Iraqi oil wealth

Do we in the United States have a fair and equitable distribution of our own oil wealth?

13 posted on 05/10/2003 6:21:13 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mckenzie; okie01; MEG33
and no one is willing to call the USA on this matter YET but it is coming

OOOOOhhhhhhh. You got me scared of a coming "Regime Change".

14 posted on 05/10/2003 6:23:34 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (FReepers discover the TRUTH, and distribute it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
The UN sanctions (along with precluding Iraqi possession of WMD's) ALSO included a respect for human rights, a fair and equitable distribution of Iraqi oil wealth, and an end to political hegemony by the Bathists.

walkingman's statement, not mine.

15 posted on 05/10/2003 6:23:50 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
There are also questions about our possession of WMD's, our respect for human rights, (particularly since we imprison more people proportionately than any other country) and our political hegemony by the Republicrats

There are questions only from the very ignorant, or leftists.

Do we in the United States have a fair and equitable distribution of our own oil wealth?

A question worthy of Ralph Nader.

What's eating YOU?

16 posted on 05/10/2003 6:27:27 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Nick Danger
People could die. But to these jerks, it's all about "gotcha." What scum they are.

Yeah, they are, but on the other hand, many of the Bush supporters are now saying it wasn't even about WMDs......LOL!

What political horse crap....

18 posted on 05/10/2003 6:33:29 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
If weapons of mass destruction are not found, someone in the intellegence services who mislead this president, will pay the price. Count on it!

If they are not found it does not mean that they were not there. There is much information from the captured cards and other prisoners that the stuff was all hidden and/or moved to Syria. If so, it will be found, but not so soon,

19 posted on 05/10/2003 6:37:38 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JBBooks
However, at this time the issue being posed is if there were, in fact, no WMD in Iraq, how could US intelligence have been so wrong?

I am sure the intel waas accurate at some point before invasion and probably not long before. There are suggestions that it was buried so deep that it could not be retrieved in the time between invasion and Baghdad or between invasion and the point at which the relevant commanders (if still alive) determined that all was lost and split.

20 posted on 05/10/2003 6:41:28 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson