Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janeane Garofalo Calls It Like She Sees It: An interview with famed provocateur and pop pundit
Movie Poop Shoot ^ | May 16, 2003 | By Thom Fowler

Posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:00 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

While I know and love Janeane Garofalo for her charmed comedy career, many Americans came to know her recently as a media spokesperson for the anti-war movement. While she, along with Susan Sarandon, the DIXIE CHICKS and Jessica Lange became the poster-women of hate for the anti-intellectual and insubstantial talk show hosts such as Bill O’Reilly who are more interested in good TV than good debate, she was also lauded for taking the anti-war message to the mainstream media. Garofalo made an interesting comment about being attacked by the right wing as much for being a woman as for being feminist and progressive. Come to think of it, Tim Robbins didn’t take nearly as much of a beating even though he was just as involved as his wife, Susan Sarandon.

Her interest in progressive social and political issues have been a strong motivator in her life and in her stand-up. I interviewed Janeane Garofalo to hear more of her side of the anti-war message without interruption or criticism and her personal interest in living, voting and supporting the progressive values platform.

This is a lengthy introduction but I hope it helps to provide the proper context to develop a deeper understanding of the point of view of Janeane Garofalo and where she and many others like her, fit into these larger stories about our ever evolving culture.

TF: What is your personal commitment to the progressive movement and why is it so important for you?

JG: I am a progressive, liberal person. I vote that way and I live that way. That is the way I believe is the ideal way for society to function in a liberal, tolerant, egalitarian way. I contribute money towards causes that espouse that. I believe anyone who values their civil liberties would think it is important especially women and people of color had better vote Democrat, especially the more liberal wing of the Democrats because this radically right-wing administration seeks to keep the playing field very unlevel. Askew, if you will.

I think anyone that’s concerned about their freedom and their future and their child’s future and the economy had better vote Democrat. And had better vote for the more liberal Democratic candidates. All this partisan flag-waving isn’t going to save the economy. It isn’t going to make you more secure from terrorists and it isn’t going to stop the corporate scandals. It isn’t going to stop the tragedies inherent in the globalization movement sponsored by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

If you say that oil is a big motivator, a prime mover of the Bush Jr. Administration’s foreign policy agenda, people who discount any attempt to tell an alternate version of the story of the Bush Administration will say, “Oh, that’s crazy, that’s a ridiculous thing to say.” And that’s what proves that it’s oil. Why would they get so hyper about it? If it wasn’t oil, they’d just be like, easy going about it if people mentioned oil and said, “No, it isn’t.”

I equate this, before I quit, I quit drinking in 2001. Before that a lot of people would say, “You’ve got to quit drinking.” I would be like, “Why? I don’t have a problem with alcohol.” And they’d say, “You have to quit drinking alcohol.” I would say, “Alcohol is not the problem. I don’t have a problem with alcohol. I was adamant about that. And then my friend Amy said, “I need you to quit eating oranges. And I went, “Okay.” And then she said, “Do you see? I just asked you to quit eating oranges and you were fine with that. And when I asked you to quit drinking you make a big deal that drinking is absolutely not a problem.” I equate that, if that makes any sense, with the oil issue. If you bring up oil, you are somehow some kind of wing nut.

TF: If the Bush Administration is so keen on liberating the oppressed, as is now the Pentagon sponsored, media-driven, story about our foreign policy towards Iraq, why is the Vice President so against racial integration, gay rights and equal rights for women?

JG: Because they are not into liberation. They aren’t. It’s the politics of exclusion. I’m sure everybody is thrilled that Saddam is gone. There is no question about that. Nobody has a problem with that. Perhaps a lot of these guys that have been around since Gerald Ford shouldn’t have been supporting Saddam in the first place. And perhaps Halliburton shouldn’t have been doing business with him until 1998. But be that as it may, a lot of nations are guilty of supporting questionable regimes. Not just America. That’s a worldwide business-is-business issue.

TF: Why doesn’t that story get told in the mainstream media?

JG: It does in dribs and drabs. But the mainstream media has decided to be self-censoring. I suppose it’s because they don’t want to appear to be unlikable, un-American, or its because their corporate masters decree that they tow the party line or tow the establishment line and then of course you have THE NEW YORK POST and Fox whose job it is to not give the whole story.

TF: But Fox’s journalism is Fair and Balanced as they like to remind their viewers dozens of times every day.

JG: According to their definition. My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News because of the words “fair” and “balanced.”

TF: In STEAL THIS MOVIE, you played the wife of the controversial Viet Nam era agitator, Abbie Hoffman. In that movie, federal agents seem to have much more power to openly bully anyone who was critical of the Nixon administration or the Viet Nam war. What was it about Abbie Hoffman that was so threatening that the government did anything they could to shut him up.

JG: It wasn’t just him. They were doing it to so many people. They followed and had files on people who were the most innocuous. There would be no reason in the world to have a file on them. Like Granny D [Doris Haddock] and Martin Luther King’s children.

I think that they saw in a guy like Abbie Hoffman a guy that really, charismatically, moves people. And he’s a guy who’s not afraid of them. And that’s what scares them the most when there are people that aren’t afraid of “them.” That aren’t afraid of the power base. That aren’t afraid of Cointelpro. Aren’t afraid of the government. Aren’t afraid of Joe McCarthy. I know he’s before Abbie Hoffman but they aren’t afraid of guys like Joe McCarthy. And when you are not afraid of McCarthyism and you are not afraid of repressive regimes and you are not afraid of Big Brother, then they wanna know about you.

(Excerpt) Read more at moviepoopshoot.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apology; barf; garofalo; liar; traitor; who
Basically the entire interview is two extreme leftist complaining about how eeevile Republicans are and how censored Garafalo is.

Of special note is her attack on Fox (one of the few places that had her on) for being biased and her glee that one of her friends is suing the network for calling itself "fair and balanced."

I hope O'Reilly remembers that the next time he defends her as courageous for going on his show.

Of other note is her admission of being a recovering alcoholic. It makes one wonder if she has simply substituted a new addition (the spotlight) for the old.

And if anyone asks "where's the barf alert"...it's an interview with Jeaneane Garofalo. Her name alone is plenty of alert.

1 posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:00 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Movie Poop Shoot. Indeed!
2 posted on 05/17/2003 7:57:26 AM PDT by fat city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Why do people think she's talented? She has only one "role" that she plays over and over.....and it's not funny. She doesn't even have large enough "star power" to make much of a difference, no matter what drivel comes out of her mouth.
3 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:40 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This woman is beneath contempt. She uses her "persona" to let us know her liberal soclialist viewpoint and quite frankly, the fast glib talk she puts out is nothing more than just surface. She doesn't really know anything but can put words together, thus getting the "folks" to listen to her and think she actually knows something. She heads up the Hollywood list of slime.
4 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:58 AM PDT by cousair (aA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Check this out. Had to post it when reading this slop.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2831399046&category=15687
Not even worth a nickel! lol
5 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:18 AM PDT by ozaukeemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Who is Janeane Garofalo??
6 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:20 AM PDT by got_moab?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Of special note is her attack on Fox (one of the few places that had her on) for being biased and her glee that one of her friends is suing the network for calling itself "fair and balanced."

Bubba-Jean Garbarfalo after Brian Kilmeade slam-dunked her as the idiot, liberal panty-waist she is . . .


7 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:50 AM PDT by geedee (It ain't braggin' if the outcome meets or exceeds the outburst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
JG: "There would be no reason in the world to have a file on them."

She must be making a parallel to people like Hillary Clinton and FBI files which are kept in private to be used for extortion and racketeering on innocent law abiding folk like most conservatives.

I've always found it interesting how liberals claim McCarthy was absurd when he suggested covert schemes were afoot in the 50/60s to create a more socialistic America. Do they sincerely believe America is less socialistic and more conservative today than during the era of McCarthy?

IMHO, the evidence would suggest there was something sound in McCarthy's cause. The mechanisms he employed may have had weaknesses, but the cause seems to have been very well substantiated by how socialization has overcome middle America and destoyed so much of our potential.

8 posted on 05/17/2003 8:02:00 AM PDT by Cvengr (0;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: got_moab?
Who is Janeane Garofalo??

Commercial spokesman for ToysRUs . No,thats Jeffrey Giraffe. Sorry.

9 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:36 AM PDT by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
If you say that oil is a big motivator, a prime mover of the Bush Jr. Administration’s foreign policy agenda, people who discount any attempt to tell an alternate version of the story of the Bush Administration will say, “Oh, that’s crazy, that’s a ridiculous thing to say.” And that’s what proves that it’s oil. Why would they get so hyper about it? If it wasn’t oil, they’d just be like, easy going about it if people mentioned oil and said, “No, it isn’t.”

OMG, this is the depth of thought that takes up the majority of space in an otherwise vacuous liberal mind.

10 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:42 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"And I was like ..."
"And he was like ..."
"And then I was like ..."
"And then he was like all hyper and stuff."
"So I got like all quiet cause he was rambling on about freeing the Iraqis and stuff."

... Transcript of Bill O'Reilly's interview with Janeane Garofalo, written by Janeane Garofalo.
11 posted on 05/17/2003 8:15:13 AM PDT by GenXFreedomFighter (Make the liberals angry ... SUCCEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
They and everyone that shares their views can stick their thoughts where the sun don't shine!
12 posted on 05/17/2003 8:15:36 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Basically the entire interview is two extreme leftist complaining about how eeevile Republicans are and how censored Garafalo is"

She and the author seem to think all Republicans are angry white males, too...but Garafolo, Sarandon and Natalie Maines took a far bigger beating from conservative women, because we're tired of these uneduacated, irrational, shallow, hormonally-driven, megalomaniacs vapidly spouting hateful stupidity into the faces of mainstream America, therebye making ALL women look bad.

They seem to have forgotten there is probably no more dangerous creature on Earth than a truely ticked off female.

Just my 2 cents as a conservative woman tired of having these alien beings shoved down our throats as some kind of epitome of womanhood.

13 posted on 05/17/2003 8:16:27 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News

He is one NASTY leftie, I think he's British, an old favorite at CNN. I hope the SCUMBAG LAWYERS charge him double for his idiotic loser lawsuit.

14 posted on 05/17/2003 8:41:46 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Tim Robbins doesn't get "picked on" as much as his lovely lady because most people know he is only mouthing her thought for the day. PS, BLL - I'm from the sauerkraut capital of the area. We're practically neighbors.
15 posted on 05/17/2003 8:48:14 AM PDT by pacobell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
From interview -- JG: According to their definition. My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News because of the words “fair” and “balanced.”

Jon Stewart of the Daily Show recently had Diane Ravitch on as a guest, promoting her new book which discusses how political correctness is destroying the English language. Jon Stewart was fascinated by this topic and clearly enjoyed having Diane Ravitch as his guest. By contrast, JG's friend's lawsuit sound trivial. The promotion of a news show, through use of the words "fair" and "balanced," is not cause for a lawsuit. However, I think a rule or law eliminating such words used that way might be the basis of a complaint about violation of Free Speech.
16 posted on 05/17/2003 8:49:30 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Janeane Garofalo is a human cigarette butt....

Yes, let the Demcrats showcase their loony ideologues -- the Baldwins, Moores, Sarandons, Frankens and Garafalos. With each and every interview a few more Democratic voters realize this party indeed represents the criminally insane.

17 posted on 05/17/2003 9:01:39 AM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
read later bump
18 posted on 05/17/2003 9:03:53 AM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
She is one sick bitch. In the full interview she confesses to purposefully looking like a skank. Who does that? Why?
And I didn't know Cheney was against racial integration. I'll have to think before I vote in 2004!
Ugly, ugly stuff.
19 posted on 05/17/2003 9:06:14 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
BOYCOTT HOLLYWEIRD!!!
20 posted on 05/17/2003 9:07:18 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Askew, if you will

Ergo, Me thinketh she is a pompous ignorant Hollywood idiot with yes, a dictionary and a crack pipe...

21 posted on 05/17/2003 9:11:08 AM PDT by Porterville (Screw the grammar, full posting ahead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
If Garafalo calls things as she sees them, perhaps the "famed provocateur" should consider not keeping her "famed intellectual glasses" up her rectum when they're not in use.
22 posted on 05/17/2003 9:21:07 AM PDT by Wondervixen (Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cousair
"Oh my (he sighs), if I only had one wish......

...no, no one has that kind of luck...

23 posted on 05/17/2003 9:30:03 AM PDT by daylate-dollarshort (http://www.strato.net/~cmranch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The interview shows that Garofalo is so deeply bound up in wrong conclusions based on false premises that it's unlikely she can ever get out. Maybe after she's been sober a few more years she'll have a "moment of clarity" about politics to equal the moment of clarity she had about booze. AA friends have told me that does happen on occasion. But she looks like a pretty hard case.
25 posted on 05/17/2003 9:55:11 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daylate-dollarshort
I wish Scott Peterson would take her fishing.
26 posted on 05/17/2003 9:55:32 AM PDT by got_moab?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: got_moab?
"I wish Scott Peterson would take her fishing."

Nawww...she's too ugly for bait. Even fish have their standards.

27 posted on 05/17/2003 9:58:12 AM PDT by daylate-dollarshort (http://www.strato.net/~cmranch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: got_moab?
I wish Scott Peterson would take her fishing.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!...beer on my monitor and keyboard alert!

FMCDH

28 posted on 05/17/2003 10:34:08 AM PDT by nothingnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I get all of my late breaking news from the 'Movie Poop Chute,' lol-especially from Janene Garafalo!
29 posted on 05/17/2003 10:40:46 AM PDT by ewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinneyhead
His faith. What has JG substituted her alchahol addiction with? Arguably, the feel good shallow cult of liberlism.
30 posted on 05/17/2003 11:15:40 AM PDT by DeepInEnemyTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

To: freepatriot32

Why Am I Always The One To Get Chlamydia?


Op Ed Photo

I don't get it. I'm a good person who lives an honest life and is nice to people, yet for some reason, I seem to have the worst luck: My toast always falls jam-side down, the one day it rains is always the day I leave my windows open, and the one time I have unprotected sex in a public-beach changing room, I end up with chlamydia! What gives?

Yes, every single year, I go for my annual gyno visit and, without fail, I find out I've got chlamydia again. Why am I always the one to get chlamydia? It's just not fair!

It's not like I'm any more sexually active than the average girl. My best friend Susan Suranden has sex with her boyfriend almost every single night, and she's never had it. Me, I'll be lucky if I have 200 one-night stands in an entire year! So if she's having sex at least 10 times as often as me, why hasn't she ever had it? Did I do something wrong in a past life? I don't think I've done anything recently to deserve being cursed with chronic chlamydia. I guess I'm just a chlamydia magnet or something.

I know what you're probably thinking: Susan's so dumb, she never got her first infection cleared up. Well, that's just not true. Sure, I was totally freaked when I first got it and the DNC convention back in 2000. (I thought I was going to go blind or crazy or something.) But when my doctor told me that, if caught early, chlamydia is easily cured with just a day's worth of antibiotics, I was totally relieved. Thank goodness my first experience wasn't like the time I caught that rare strain of Southeast Asian chlamydia. Lying in that hospital bed with my urethra on fire made me appreciate how easy it was to get rid the normal chlamydia I usually get.

I'm not irresponsible, either. I take care of myself, because I totally wouldn't want to spread it to other people. Especially cute guys. There's nothing more embarrassing than getting a call from some hottie you picked up at the bar last month accusing you of giving him chlamydia. Once that happens to you half a dozen times, you start to get real careful and make sure you go to the doctor as soon as you see symptoms.

And it's not like I don't have standards. I tend to go for goth-wanna-be, Micheal Moore-type guys, the kind who'd be very unlikely to have an STD. Plus, I almost always have them use a condom if they don't swear up and down that they're clean. So what's the deal?

We've all been there. I mean, I'm hardly the only one out there having oral, vaginal, and anal sexual contact. I'm just the one who winds up with a pus-like discharge shooting out of my hoo-hoo.

Sometimes, I think it's my family's fault. The Glauber clan is cursed. My dad died in a drunk-driving accident when I was 5, and my mom is just plain crazy. She actually got pregnant when she was 40 after dating a guy she worked with for a week. She even kept the baby. That's why I'm on the pill. I've been more or less lucky on that front (don't ask), yet I've got to admit that this chlamydia thing gets me down. Maybe if I came from a different family, I might have better luck.

Oh, listen to me pissing and moaning: "My family's crazy"... "I wish I was luckier"... "I'm always contracting chlamydia." Everybody's got problems. It's not like I'm starving on the street without a penny to my name. I've got good friends, a good job, and a halfway-decent sex life. Maybe instead of whining about how much I seem to get chlamydia, I should be thankful for the times I don't have it.

I must say, I would probably have a more positive attitude about the whole chlamydia thing if I didn't have it right now. But, as they say, the grass is always greener on the STD-free side of the fence, right?


31 posted on 05/17/2003 11:23:28 AM PDT by ChadGore (It's all an Amish plot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinneyhead
"Your president's a recovering alcoholic. What's he replaced his alcoholism with?"

Dubya is now high on American patriotism -- AND inspiring his people towards disinfecting the world of leftist wing-nuts, self-absorbed poseurs, and pompous nitwits...

Ringing a bell here by chance??

32 posted on 05/17/2003 12:10:57 PM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: spinneyhead
Your president's a recovering alcoholic. What's he replaced his alcoholism with? Ian www.spinneyhead.co.uk
I don't know. But I do know that I have replaced you with Folger's Crystals.

I don't think anyone will notice.

33 posted on 05/17/2003 1:23:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ozaukeemom
you're right. Bidding starts at .02 I'd give her/him/it change for it's worth.

Seller is from L.A. Southern Kapitol for Socialism.

34 posted on 05/17/2003 1:44:36 PM PDT by kstewskis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I think someone needs to buy this woman a drink.
35 posted on 05/17/2003 2:17:49 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Your president's a recovering alcoholic. What's he replaced his alcoholism with?

I guess the real question is who is smarter?

President George W. Bush earned a bachelor's degree from Yale University and an MBA from Harvard Business School; served as an F-102 pilot in the Texas Air National Guard; began his career in the oil and gas business in Midland in 1975 and worked in the energy industry until 1986; elected governor on Nov. 8, 1994, with 53.5 percent of the vote. In a historic re-election victory, he became the first Texas governor to be elected to consecutive four-year terms on Nov. 3, 1998, winning 68.6 percent of the vote, with 49 percent of the Hispanic vote, 27 percent of the African-American vote, 27 percent of Democrats and 65 percent of women.

Janeane Garofalo: Dropped out of college Career: Stand-up comedy/acting - Oh and BTW - Recovering Alcoholic!

Bush replaced his booze with service to his state and to his country and love and faithfulness unto the Lord.

Garofalo replaced her booze with chlamydia from "having 200 one-night stands in an entire year!" Yep this is an idiot I want to listen too!

36 posted on 05/17/2003 2:20:47 PM PDT by Bommer (Tom Dasshole is a Domestic Enemy!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
It amuses me how the Left sees itself as independent thinkers, as skeptics. Yet, they are blindly loyal to the liberal creed- unquestioning of liberal dogma and slavish before liberal leaders like Clinton. They are intellectually uncurious about the inefficiencies of government bureaucracies, about the fact that handouts foster dependence, and how the government controls citizens and buys votes through its welfare state. They surrender power to the federal government at the drop of a hat- money is power and they are always ready to take money from the citizens and turn it over to the government in the form of a tax increase. An independent thinker would not rest his fate in the hands of a bureaucrat- whether it concerns education or health care. Liberalism is a civic religion. There are fundamentalists, like Garofalo, who are unquestioning drones. But there are a few willing to challenge the sysem such as Zell Miller, people are not willing to cast a blind eye to the failings and frequent illogic of the Democrat party. Liberal fundamentalists are so "skeptical" - so eager to point out everybody else's problems- you wonder if they have any time to examine their own.
37 posted on 05/17/2003 4:06:07 PM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Garofalo's fifteen minutes of fame should have ended fifteen minutes ago.
38 posted on 05/17/2003 5:59:11 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (For or against us.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
I equate this, before I quit, I quit drinking in 2001. Before that a lot of people would say, “You’ve got to quit drinking.” I would be like, “Why? I don’t have a problem with alcohol.” And they’d say, “You have to quit drinking alcohol.” I would say, “Alcohol is not the problem. I don’t have a problem with alcohol. I was adamant about that. And then my friend Amy said, “I need you to quit eating oranges. And I went, “Okay.” And then she said, “Do you see? I just asked you to quit eating oranges and you were fine with that. And when I asked you to quit drinking you make a big deal that drinking is absolutely not a problem.” I equate that, if that makes any sense, with the oil issue. If you bring up oil, you are somehow some kind of wing nut.

Uh ... I do think that this girl (and I say that as if I am talking about a little girl, by the way she is lost in her wierd unfounded rationals) needs some serious counsel.

The point is that "oil" is the left's only rational of rock throwing to the right. They have no basis for it other than our president being from Texas has some strong ties to the industry therefore it must be "about oil."

This warped mentality omits that
1 - it is quite clear that for France, it WAS about Oil, and that to keep Saddam in power, was proven to be tied to their strong oil relationship with Iraq and the "bonanza" that they were after with this tie.
2 - They also miss the point that if it was truly "about oil" for the USA, it would be a lot easier to deal with Saddam to buy oil than for some future peoples republic of Iraq that may be more difficult.
3 - If it was about Oil, why did Colin Powell immediately say that ANY funds from Iraq's oil belongs to the Iraqi people and we will hold them in trust until we are gone and we will be gone as soon as possible, which history shows is always pretty damn quick .. sometimes too quick (WW2 coming to mind).

The problem with the Garofalo's of the world is that they simply do not think.... they either make up or simply "parrot" some rationale that they heard that fits with the "anti-Republican" position that they want to hold.

To encourage women and minorities to "vote Democratic" also has no basis in any facts, but that is another subject entirely....

39 posted on 05/19/2003 10:15:05 AM PDT by AgThorn (Go go Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator

Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The guy can't even spell his own name. It should be Tom. Or Clymer.
42 posted on 05/23/2003 2:34:45 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: JournalJunkie
. . . but when Brian started in on her, I was laughing so hard . . .

LOL. Me too. I even taped it so I can play it for friends who didn't see it. He was one mad hombre and she looked like she'd been smacked with a two-by-four.

Welcome to FR by the way. I noticed you're relatively new. Grow thick skin and don't ever let idiots like me run you off. LOL. We're often-times a surly bunch, but it's only because we're so passionate. Hang around and you'll love it.

44 posted on 05/23/2003 5:21:12 PM PDT by geedee (Part of the secret of a success in life is to eat what you like and let the food fight it out inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: AgThorn
"The problem with the Garofalo's of the world is that they simply do not think.... they either make up or simply "parrot" some rationale that they heard that fits with the "anti-Republican" position that they want to hold."

That is the whole premise behind liberals.
They don't use their brains, they usse their emotions.
We can only hope that most of them will grow out of it before it is too late!
46 posted on 05/27/2003 8:19:33 PM PDT by 1IDVET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson