Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JFK's liaisons, Jackie's pain
New York Daily News | 5/18/03 | TRACY CONNOR

Posted on 05/18/2003 6:53:16 AM PDT by kattracks

They say a woman always knows - and Jacqueline Kennedy was no exception.

The queen of Camelot was heart-wrenchingly aware of the sexual affairs President John Kennedy engaged in during his years in the White House, a new book reveals.

In "An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963," author Robert Dallek details how the President tried to satisfy a voracious appetite for sex by bedding a string of party girls and staffers.

In "An Unfinished Life: John F. Kennedy, 1917-1963," author Robert Dallek details how the President tried to satisfy a voracious appetite for sex by bedding a string of party girls and staffers.

The bio also unveiled John Kennedy's long-secret affair with a teenage intern, unmasked by the Daily News last week as Marion (Mimi) Beardsley Fahnestock, now a Manhattan divorcee.

John Kennedy's glamorous young wife was pained by his flagrant philandering, to the point where she made snide or angry remarks about it in dangerously public settings, the book says.

"Isn't it bad enough that you solicit this woman for my husband, but then you insult me by asking me to shake her hand!" she sniped at two aides after spotting one of her husband's sex partners on a receiving line.

Another day, during a tour of the White House, she told a shocked French journalist, "This is the girl who supposedly is sleeping with my husband."

No secret

Edward Klein, author of the 1996 book "All Too Human: The Love Story of Jack and Jackie Kennedy," agrees that JFK's extracurricular activities were no secret to his wife.

"It wasn't a mystery to her that all the young, attractive women in the White House were fair game as far as her husband was concerned.

"Jackie was completely aware her husband was a hopeless philanderer, and when he did it privately and without her knowledge, it bothered her far less than when he would fail to hide it in public."

Before he was elected President, John Kennedy could be cruelly blatant about his skirt-chasing.

"At a dinner party, he would often disappear with a woman who was sitting at the table with them," Klein said.

"It caused a lot of heartache and tension, but she [Jackie Kennedy] was accustomed to men who behaved like that," Klein said, referring to her father, Jack Bouvier, a notorious womanizer.

"Jackie came from an upper class where this kind of behavior, though not applauded by women, was widely expected by them," he said. "Nonetheless, it wasn't easy to live with."

Jackie Kennedy's own alleged love affairs may have salved her wounds. Klein says she carried on with Fiat heir Gianni Agnelli; other accounts say she had a revenge romance with movie star William Holden.

In researching his book - a scholarly tome that for the first time reports how ill John Kennedy was in office and how much medication he took - Dallek hoped to see a 500-page oral history recorded by Jackie Kennedy.

Her daughter, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, blocked access to the papers, which are locked up at the Kennedy Library in Boston. She did not return a call from the Daily News.

Dallek did, however, see reams of letters written by a young JFK to his close friend Lemoyne Billings.

He was 17 years old when he boasted in one letter about his success with girls - decades before his rumored romance with Marilyn Monroe.

"I can't help it. It can't be my good looks because I'm not much handsomer than anybody else," he wrote. "It must be my personality."

Dad's dalliances

Dallek suggests Kennedy's Casanova complex was rooted in the infamous infidelities of his own father, Joseph Kennedy, and a rivalry with his older brother, Navy pilot Joseph Kennedy Jr., who died at age 29 when his plane exploded over the English Channel during World War II.

John Kennedy's constant illnesses, and predictions that he would die young, also may have spurred him on - though his frail health didn't interfere with his sex life.

"The nurses here are the dirtiest bunch of females I've ever seen," he wrote to Billings during a 1934 hospital stay. "One of them wanted to know if I would give her a workout last night. ... I said yes, but she was put off duty early."

During another illness, he whined about being in Boston.

"Millions of beautiful misses arrived in Palm Beach daily so I am getting rather fed up with the meat up here, if you know what I mean," he wrote.

He bragged about having sex with one woman in a bathtub, and told how an aide to his father lined up willing dates for him and his football buddies on Cape Cod, Mass.

By the time he was at Harvard University in 1937, he was known as "Play-boy," and had too many girlfriends to remember their names.

As an unmarried congressman, he had a "smorgasbord of women" - mostly one-night stands with flight attendants and secretaries, the book reports.

Election to the Senate, his marriage to Jacqueline Bouvier and even the spotlight on the Oval Office didn't deter him. If anything, the presidency whetted his thirst.

"Kennedy's womanizing had, of course, always been a form of amusement, but now it also gave him a release from unprecedented daily tensions," Dallek writes.

During a 1961 meeting with British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan, he confided that he got headaches if he went three days without sex.

His mistresses included Pamela Turnure, Jackie's press secretary; Mary Pinchot Meyer, Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee's sister-in-law; two secretaries nicknamed Fiddle and Faddle, and mob moll Judith Campbell Exner.

JFK & intern

Then there was a 19-year-old "tall, slender, beautiful" White House intern.

Her identity remained a secret until last week, but JFK came close to having several other "other women" publicly named during his time in office - including Ellen Rometsch, a suspected East German spy who romped naked in the White House pool. While Kennedy's tomcatting has long been a source of fascination, Dallek doesn't believe it altered history.

"As far as I can tell," he wrote, "Kennedy's dalliances were no impediment to his being an effective President."

Originally published on May 17, 2003



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beardsley; jackiekennedy; jfk; mimi; robertdallek; smorgasboard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last
Chapter three: the part of this saga where we're supposed to compare the "long suffering hillary! with Jackie.
1 posted on 05/18/2003 6:53:16 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Jackie came from an upper class where this kind of behavior, though not applauded by women, was widely expected by them,"

Upper class? I guess that depends on what the meaning of "class" means.

2 posted on 05/18/2003 6:57:11 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
See..Clinton's not so bad and Hillary is a saint.
3 posted on 05/18/2003 6:58:51 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
No big deal Jackie was French and the best part of it she was a Democrat. Democrats have no morals, no rules, no laws, they kill babies and have no God.
4 posted on 05/18/2003 7:00:58 AM PDT by Nagual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple; StarFan; JulieRNR21
ping
5 posted on 05/18/2003 7:02:17 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I do believe the dear boy forgot to mention the East German spy Kennedy was messing around with. Oh well, we can't put anything in there that might impact negatively on national security can we...

When I was a kid I thought Kennedy was 'the guy'. It's been a rather slow process over the years, but I've come to the conclusion that Kennedy was a moral wasteland. Aided by the press his true character was hidden and a make-believe version honed to build him up.

Look at the trash leaders the Democrats have foisted off on this nation in the last forty-five years. And people are upset about Bush????? He may not be perfect, but he's no John Kennedy, thank God.
6 posted on 05/18/2003 7:08:33 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I guess Jackie had a "boys will be boys' outlook. What could she do? Sad. I hope Father Oscar Huber was quick with the Last Rites thing in Dallas.
7 posted on 05/18/2003 7:11:22 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Kim Jong Il had ANOTHER bad underwear day . He found "decapitate" in his English-Korean dictionary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We may pity the long-suffering Jacqueline Kennedy, but she knew the deal going in. The Kennedy clan was no mysterious cult among those of their social level, they were bad boys, and all the interested parties were aware of their reputation. All this only made them interesting, but not deities. The God-personas were conferred upon them by the relatively ignorant (not a few of whom were and are in the national mass media).
8 posted on 05/18/2003 7:19:18 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
I guess Jackie had a "boys will be boys' outlook.

A boys will be boys outlook where the "boy" constantly abuses his wife (as in flaunting his girlfriends in front of her) seems to be somewhat over the line, imo. I guess one learns to put up with these "little annoyances" when the reward is power and prestige and fawning from an adoring public who have absolutely no idea of the disgusting truth behind the myth.

9 posted on 05/18/2003 7:22:21 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I am sure this hurt Jackie quite a bit, and I think she expected him to cut it out after their marriage. Perhaps she believed she could change him. Instead she shopped and spent his money like water, which annoyed the heck out of JFK, and she spent 4 day weekends out of Washington and away from the shenanigans at the WH and on JFK's overseas trips. She also made sure to be seen occasionally in the press with rich, dashing men, like when she was in Italy with Caroline and John, she and hung out publically with Gianni Agnelli, which bugged JFK.

She kinda "did her own thing" when she was First Lady, a term she hated. She said it sounded like a show horse. She refused to attend many official functions, preferred to stay in bed all morning and hang around the WH in casual clothes. She was a borderline upper-crust beatnik in a way. A fascinating woman IMO.

10 posted on 05/18/2003 7:33:14 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
sounds like Hillary to me. They bear equal responsibility, though.
11 posted on 05/18/2003 7:41:48 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Kim Jong Il had ANOTHER bad underwear day . He found "decapitate" in his English-Korean dictionary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Spare me! Jackie was the highest priced hooker America has ever known. Old Joe Kennedy paid her [big bucks] to marry Jack and make him look responsible so he could becaome president (with Joe and the mob's help). Then, Onasis paid her big bucks to be his trophy wife.

What did Jackie care about Jack getting some on the side? He didn't bother Jackie and she was able to do what she wanted. Same as when she became JackieO.

Jackie is one of those media creations left over from their imaginary Camelot, a fable created by the left wing media to help ease the country into socialism. We will never know JFK's true agenda but Jackie was never a "partner," merely an ornament.

12 posted on 05/18/2003 7:44:58 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The article mentions the East German spy of Cold War era, but not the Nazi spy he diddled with 20 years before. I seem to recall reading about a campaign worker he impregnated in the 1950s (right on a desk in his Boston campaign office), whom he forced to have an abortion.
13 posted on 05/18/2003 7:47:11 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
I guess Jackie had a "boys will be boys' outlook. What could she do?

Come on, him being a "bad boy" was the initial attraction. Why do you think "bad boys" have so many women throwing themselves at them.

14 posted on 05/18/2003 7:48:53 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I am sure this hurt Jackie quite a bit, and I think she expected him to cut it out after their marriage.

Probably. That's kinda the standard outlook -- a high attraction level for the "bad boy" type and then an expectation that they'll reform once you marry them.

15 posted on 05/18/2003 7:51:20 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Thanks for pointing that out. I guess I missed it. I hadn't heard about the NAZI spy or the abortion.
16 posted on 05/18/2003 8:02:03 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Please provide proof that Joe Kennedy paid Jackie "big bucks" to marry JFK. Hard proof.

While it's true that Jackie needed and wanted money, if your husband was murdered and then your brother-in-law was murdered, you too might seek the comfort, privacy, and security someone like Onassis could provide, especially if you feared for the lives of your children.

Whatever their relationship, Jackie spent months and months after JFK's murder crying and mourning. I have done extensive research on the Kennedys, read most of the books written about them, (including a very interesting and revealing one by Jackie's personal WH assistant Mary Barelli Gallagher) and while the marriage was on some levels a strange one, not unlike the marriages of other "bluebloods", I have come to conclusion that Jackie loved JFK, whatever other ambitions she had which made him attractive to her.

17 posted on 05/18/2003 8:12:28 AM PDT by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I can't help it. It can't be my good looks because I'm not much handsomer than anybody else," he wrote. "It must be my personality."

And being a multimillionaire had nothing to do with it, right? < Extreme heavy Sarcasm with a capitol S. >

18 posted on 05/18/2003 8:13:52 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I knew Jack Kennedy, and you Sir are no Jack Kennedy

Dan Quale should have stood up and bragged that he wasn't. Maybe he should send an autographed copy of this book to all of the slobbering hypocritical democrats that criticized him with a notation that includes, I am no Jack Kennedy, I am better than this.
19 posted on 05/18/2003 8:20:17 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
..."sounds like Hillary to me."

I'm sure at least that Jackie spoke to WH employees and that no one was afraid to look her in the eye. As well, Jackie's office wasn't down the hall from the Oval Office, nor did she probably play a role in making policy decisions.

20 posted on 05/18/2003 8:36:19 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Total agreement on the UPPER CLASS comment. Mara Liasson (sp?) made the UPPER CLASS comment on FOX NEWS WATCH yesterday. So I guess UPPER CLASS now means:

You cheat on your wife.
You take drugs.
21 posted on 05/18/2003 8:41:01 AM PDT by Concerto in D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
"We may pity the long-suffering Jacqueline Kennedy, but she knew the deal going in"

She was no better, her cousin (my wifes uncle) called her the biggest whore in DC.

The only reason that she stayed with him was that Joe was paying her $one million a year to stay and stay silent. When he became incapacitated she went to Rose to demand her million for the year (her cousin was in the house at the time) Rose refused to pay her. She immediatly went upstairs, came down less than 5 minutes later and told Rose to shove it, she was marrying Onassis.

22 posted on 05/18/2003 8:43:13 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I really really really object to people giving JFK a pass for his cruelty and treachery.

"Boys will be boys" is pure BS.

I, too, feel Jackie's grief was genuine and profound.

People that do what he did might as well drag razor blades over the flesh of their 'loved ones', for all the pain he so eagerly delivers.

He was an animal without a conscience...a glamourous and gifted one, no doubt.

I loved him when I was a kid...lived in Dallas when he died, was deeply marked by the event.

As the years pass, the affection for him has been tempered by rage and disgust.

He never knew the meaning of the words Semper Fi.

He kept faith only with himself and his ambition.

When I look at him, I see a cruel and deceitful liar without respect for people or principle.
23 posted on 05/18/2003 8:44:18 AM PDT by jwfiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Kennedy's womanizing had, of course, always been a form of amusement, but now it also gave him a release from unprecedented daily tensions," Dallek writes.

Dallek calls it "release", I call it wallowing in the mud.

24 posted on 05/18/2003 8:45:32 AM PDT by cyncooper (The New York Times is not a source for truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Isn't it bad enough that you solicit this woman for my husband, but then you insult me by asking me to shake her hand!" she sniped at two aides after spotting one of her husband's sex partners on a receiving line.

To use the word "snipe" describing Jackie's remarks is odd. "To snipe" carries a negative image of the complainer. It seems she would be justified in her complaint.

25 posted on 05/18/2003 8:52:02 AM PDT by cyncooper (The New York Times is not a source for truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Concerto in D
I don't think we should even mention the name "Hillary" when we also talk about Jackie. There's a BIG difference between these two ladies.

Now I'm not one of those diehard Kennedy lovers, but we have to give Jackie credit. She played the role of trophy First Lady and was a good ambassador for America when she traveled abroad. She was also a good mother, devoted to her children. And from articles I've read, she made herself available to Jack on a steady basis, and the White House staff knew to give them privacy in the afternoons. They were considered a loving young couple. I believe Jackie tried hard to keep her marriage strong.

Hillary, on the other hand....well, we all know her story (Barf).

26 posted on 05/18/2003 8:53:54 AM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Everybody does it.

It's all about sex

Can't we move on?

27 posted on 05/18/2003 8:58:23 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is bs. Jackie Kennedy was just as guilty as Hitlery for ignoring their husbands actions. These two, in my opinion, are and/or were not couragous women. They were, more like, what can you do for me. Long suffering, my you know what. It is total bs. They each expect and expected a payoff.
28 posted on 05/18/2003 9:17:23 AM PDT by freekitty (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The New Image(a highly informed one) coming to light about Kennedy (and that whole literally damned family) is that the Kennedy Familia made a deal with Hollywood, the burgeoning Television industry as well as media elites of the NE corridor to portray a possible sex addict and serial philanderer as a Great Man after only 3 years or so in office.

Kennedy we know was for media purposes a show President who behind the wholesome and athletic image of American family, was in fact a mild cripple (Addison, his back, lots of drugs, Marilyn Monroe, Mimi, etc.).

The above combined with the eldest Kennedy male dying during a near impossible WWII mission, Ted Kennedy's Chappaqua, RFK's targeted assassination, and capping it all off in the 90's with a skiing accident and death and a plane crash killing two women on board, would seem conclusive enough proof that the Kennedy legacy was largely fabricated and that Kennedy men carry a gene which predisposes them to self destruction,along with dubious impact on the American culture.

The Myth was made possible by a huge endowment made to American Liberal Institutions which continue to propagate this Myth.

By the way, why are Liberal Democratic Presidents of this era referred to by their initials: RFK, JFK,LBJ and Republican Presidents are not: Ford, Nixon, Regan and the first President Bush.

Thankfully we are doing the liberal historians a turnabout: GWB

29 posted on 05/18/2003 9:21:32 AM PDT by Helms (Californication Beyond California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
It's worse than that.

I remember reading ages ago in some bio or other, that Jackie was going to leave JFK before the election of '60, but the old man, Joe, bribed her with $1 million if she'd hang in there.

And she did of course.
30 posted on 05/18/2003 9:30:08 AM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"While Kennedy's tomcatting has long been a source of fascination, Dallek doesn't believe it altered history."

"As far as I can tell," he wrote, "Kennedy's dalliances were no impediment to his being an effective President."

So, if it was so insignificant, how come the media gave JFK such a pass? Hmmmmmmm?

They never even alluded to it, let alone name names. If it had been a republican president, you can believe they would have blatted it all over the world, complete with interviews of the women included.

31 posted on 05/18/2003 9:38:55 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yeah---looks like Jackie was in some ways the forerunner
to Hillary. BUT, the difference between the Kennedy political couple and the Clinton couple ends there. Kennedy was a sophisticated and intelligent man who actually had some real experience in life that shaped his personality, and was in fact a good President. Clinton is,
well, Clinton.
32 posted on 05/18/2003 9:47:27 AM PDT by willyboyishere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
...the part of this saga where we're supposed to compare the "long suffering hillary! with Jackie.

Let's not forget that we could also say, the "long suffering Bill" can be compared with Jackie too, as I'm sure that Hitlery has had as many female romps in the WH -and surrounding areas - as Bill has.

33 posted on 05/18/2003 9:49:29 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Marion (Mimi) Beardsley Fahnestock, now a Manhattan divorcee.

I wonder how much that job pays.

34 posted on 05/18/2003 9:50:06 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helms; All
Joe Kennedy picked Jackie, Joe Kennedy was Jackie's Svengali. Joe Kennedy even picked out Jackie's wedding gown(and she hated it). I have seen the video of a young Jack Kennedy and Jackie, being interviewed. It was eerily reminiscent of a Prince Charles and Princess Diana TV interview,a few years later.I think Jack and Prince Charles were both coerced into marriage by self serving fathers.It was well known that Jackie smoked, to keep her svelte figure, yet how many pictures do we see of her smoking. The whole facade was built on Joe Kennedy's marketing of JFK and Jackie as being perfect as American's own royality.
35 posted on 05/18/2003 9:56:19 AM PDT by MaggieMay (A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The way I heard it poor Jackie did a deal with dear old dad-in-law to stay married to his son. A lot of Jackie's pain was of her own making.
36 posted on 05/18/2003 9:59:41 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Kennedy's and Bill Clinton are serial woman abusers. Why are Demonrats and their fellow-travelling Radical Leftists allowed to get away with giving them a free pass? I thought they believed in protecting women's human rights? Or do they? Expecting a Leftist to be intellectually honest and consistent, is like expecting Arafat to convert to Judaism.
37 posted on 05/18/2003 10:10:49 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY (((Resist the Leftist Media Brainwashing Machine)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Howlin; Liz
"Isn't it bad enough that you solicit this woman for my husband, but then you insult me by asking me to shake her hand!" she sniped...

Can't wait to hear what the Hildabeast spewed. Everything should be in her new book.

38 posted on 05/18/2003 10:17:24 AM PDT by Libloather (And it STILL isn’t safe enough to vote DemocRAT or Liberteen…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"As far as I can tell," he wrote, "Kennedy's dalliances were no impediment to his being an effective President."
The myth continues.
39 posted on 05/18/2003 10:20:56 AM PDT by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; Libloather
including Ellen Rometsch, a suspected East German spy who romped naked in the White House pool.

Rumors have it that he actually married her and when he began his political career, old Joe pulled out all the stops to get that story killed and threatened everybody in Washington, literally.

If I am not mistaken, that very episode is the origination of the phrase "scorched earth policy."

40 posted on 05/18/2003 10:28:32 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: veronica
And a smoker, to boot!

Not to mention that at her death, she, too, was involved with a married man.
41 posted on 05/18/2003 10:29:56 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Everything should be in her new book.

Aren't you the dreamer.

42 posted on 05/18/2003 10:30:33 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
this woman sends shivers down my spine just listening to her speak, while I would just as soon let the clintons, jfk's and other dems continue their self immolation, it does my heart good to read your posted article and her column that newspapers apparently have not seen fit to publish :^(...rto

PS: has anyone noticed the similarity in   behavior, i.e., young girls, of jfk, bjc and saddam. and it's also interesting that the baath party was helped into power in '63 by the kennedy administration.

43 posted on 05/18/2003 10:30:34 AM PDT by visitor (Thank God George Bush Won)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Jackie came from an upper class where this kind of behavior, though not applauded by women, was widely expected by them," he said.

Where do I find this kind of upper class and can I get information on membership?

44 posted on 05/18/2003 11:05:18 AM PDT by Randjuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Exactly! Another re-write of the x42 legacy! That's all this book is for ... by the way!!
45 posted on 05/18/2003 11:14:07 AM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Jackie came from an upper class where this kind of behavior, though not applauded by women, was widely expected by them," he said. "Nonetheless, it wasn't easy to live with."

She stayed for the money --- "doing it" for the money makes you a whore. Jackie knew he didn't love her ---the marriage was for mutual financial/political gain. Just like the Clinton's ---it's a sham but Hillary is in it for what she hopes to get from it.

46 posted on 05/18/2003 11:22:23 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Class is realy a couple like the Reagans or George and Laura Bush. Plenty of other examples too. I can't imagine Nancy Reagan ever having the lack of class that she would have put up with affairs --and vice versa. Kennedys are white trash that just have big money ---and that was from bootlegging and other criminal activities.
47 posted on 05/18/2003 11:26:49 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Helms
By the way, why are Liberal Democratic Presidents of this era referred to by their initials: RFK, JFK,LBJ and Republican Presidents are not: Ford, Nixon, Regan and the first President Bush.

Because you had to be able to tell the Kennedys apart and Johnson was often referred to by all three of his names.

I would be one of the last persons on this board to defend the Kennedy family but there's nothing sinister in this. I'd expect GWB will get the same shorthand to tell him from his father.

48 posted on 05/18/2003 11:33:20 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("When Iraq is free, they will despise those who marched to keep them in hell." - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg
Defend the Kennedys??? I've scrapped higher-class gunk off my toilet bowl jets. The only Kennedy with any value was Rosemary. And you know where that got her.
49 posted on 05/18/2003 12:24:22 PM PDT by whereasandsoforth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
I guess Jackie had a "boys will be boys' outlook. What could she do? Sad. I hope Father Oscar Huber was quick with the Last Rites thing in Dallas.

What could she do ? Apparently she had the scruples of Hillary Clinton. They were both whores for power and Jackie for fame and money. She relished the spotlight, and now looking back, I feel no sympathy for this woman who the pee-ons were weeping for..." POOR JACKIE !! " She put up with it because she wanted to !

She probably knew it when she married him and did it anyhow to gain the fame. What a bottom of the barrel we scraped, and oh how they fooled an entire nation. (Well, some at least.)

Heck, with that crowd I wouldn't put it past them to drive off a bridge with a little plaything , and let her drown....and grow up rewarded to serve FOREVER as Senator !!

50 posted on 05/18/2003 12:47:47 PM PDT by Neenah (Good mornin America....How are ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson