Revealed: U.N.'s Plan for World Government

I agree with your condemation of the movie industry in general and your views on too much government. However, I don't agree with your unlimited praise of G. W. Bush. I believe he is a wolf in sheep clothing. I don't believe the apple falls far from the tree, and his father was the president of the Trilateral Commission, Rockefeller's contribution to the help the Concil on Foreign Relations socialize the world and support the United Nations in taking over the world. Remember Bush Sr.'s Sept. 1990 remark, "This action (Iraq war) is the way the founders of the UN envisioned it." The vision was a world controlled by the UN. The UN charter will subplant the Constitution of the United States, and for all the 'apparent good' Bush has done, if you look at the fact that the HOmeLand Security bill was already printed months before 9/11, and that it takes away more of our freedoms, under the guise of finding terrorists, than all of Clintons executive orders combined, I cannot agree with your unlimited praise.
QED
Alge

if you look at the fact that the HomeLand Security bill was already printed months before 9/11

Where is this fact, documented? How is this statement justified?

I don't agree with your unlimited praise of G. W. Bush

You say this twice. I detest the democrats lies and Bush bashing... One fight, day by day.

Re: Bush being pro-globalization, I have seen him go against the U.N. yet have heard him in a speech to the U.N. Assembly, sound pro-globalization. So the jury is still out on this, regarding where he stands. The time seems ripe to usher in globalization so why is he not full speed ahead?(Gore would have had us worshipping Gaia and trees and the U.N. by now,)The U.N's credibility is at an all time low so they need an anti-christ leader to bring it all home?

a package of 34 treaties, all of which were ratified by a show of hands -- no recorded vote.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a325b3f5d31.htm

America's Military into a agency ofthe United Nations.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39b4276877e8.htm

Annan in historic meeting with Supreme Court &Congress/is believed to be unprecedented.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b0c30a81760.htm

Bilderberg group wants vigorous Atlantic alliance / REUTERS IN A RARE INTERVIEW
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b11d27a10c5.htm

CONGRESS SNEAKS NEW DOMESTIC-TERRORISM BILL THUR
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a397fa1e06ab0.htm

Environmentalists Organizations Exposed {Our Klamath Basin Water Crisis}
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b870f13654c.htm

Lets Understand The U.N.{SPECIAL BULLETIN TO ALL MILITARY MEN AND VETERANS }MUST READ}
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b378b1d0e65.htm

Shadow Government of The United States and the Decline of America
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a37f592f42625.htm

The Federal Reserve - What Is It? Who Is It?
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b13c8401f8f.htm

A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b2aa8747413.htm

----HomeLand Security bill was already printed months before 9/11
Where is this fact, documented? How is this statement justified?

I evidently erred a bit, or at least I cannot find the exact source of the fact. However, the best I could find is the below quote from William Jasper's article in Vol. 18,No.20 of "The New American", "The Action is in the Reaction".
There is further comment in there about Bush's Globalist stance. Note that many if not most of Bush's Cabinet are member of the CFR, whose agenda do you think they are following? America first? Or "a new world Order"?
My bet is on the 'new world order' unfortunately.

"President Bush’s speeches and policies on terrorism are self-contradictory, schizophrenic, and dangerous. They have made us partners with the world’s worst terrorists, ostensibly to fight terrorism. And in his rush to establish a Homeland Security Department, he would demolish our system of checks and balances, sweep away our constitutional separation of powers, and create an enormous police-state apparatus. What can Mr. Bush have in mind with this misbegotten and dangerous crusade? Former Senator Gary Hart offers a clue.

Commenting on the Black Tuesday attacks during a September 14, 2001 meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Hart stated: "There is a chance for the President of the United States to use this disaster to carry out what his father — a phrase his father used I think only once, and it hasn’t been used since — and that is a new world order." The global power elite attending the CFR program knew what the senator meant and, doubtless, heartily agreed with him. According to former CFR member Admiral Chester Ward, the CFR goal of a "new world order" entails "submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government" under the UN. Hundreds of internationalists from the CFR permeate President Bush’s cabinet and entire administration. And as another article in this special issue shows (see page 19), plans for a global war on terrorism and a massive Homeland Security Department were scripted in CFR position papers long before the hijacked planes of 9-11 slammed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the Pennsylvania countryside. Yes, America must fight terrorism with resolute action and unyielding determination, but the Bush-CFR plan ultimately would extinguish the very liberty it purports to defend. That is something the terrorists themselves could never directly succeed in doing."
BTW how do you make some sentences bold?

Once there is a World Government, I'll become a Rebel. I know how to fight and I know how to hide.
---

Thomas Jefferson
From time to time, the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of
tyrants and patriots.

Thomas Jefferson
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and
armed militia is their best security.

Tench Coxe
The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the People.

Edward Abbey
A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.