Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US plans death camp
Herald Sun ^ | May 26, 2003 | Anon

Posted on 05/26/2003 12:16:13 AM PDT by BlackVeil

THE US has floated plans to turn Guantanamo Bay into a death camp, with its own death row and execution chamber.

Prisoners would be tried, convicted and executed without leaving its boundaries, without a jury and without right of appeal, The Mail on Sunday newspaper reported yesterday.

The plans were revealed by Major-General Geoffrey Miller, who is in charge of 680 suspects from 43 countries, including two Australians.

The suspects have been held at Camp Delta on Cuba without charge for 18 months.

General Miller said building a death row was one plan. Another was to have a permanent jail, with possibly an execution chamber.

The Mail on Sunday reported the move is seen as logical by the US, which has been attacked worldwide for breaching the Geneva Convention on prisoners of war since it established the camp at a naval base to hold alleged terrorists from Afghanistan.

But it has horrified human rights groups and lawyers representing detainees.

They see it as the clearest indication America has no intention of falling in line with internationally recognised justice.

The US has already said detainees would be tried by tribunals, without juries or appeals to a higher court. Detainees will be allowed only US lawyers.

British activist Stephen Jakobi, of Fair Trials Abroad, said: "The US is kicking and screaming against any pressure to conform with British or any other kind of international justice."

American law professor Jonathan Turley, who has led US civil rights group protests against the military tribunals planned to hear cases at Guantanamo Bay, said: "It is not surprising the authorities are building a death row because they have said they plan to try capital cases before these tribunals.

"This camp was created to execute people. The administration has no interest in long-term prison sentences for people it regards as hard-core terrorists."

Britain admitted it had been kept in the dark about the plans.

A Downing St spokesman said: "The US Government is well aware of the British Government's position on the death penalty."

Herald Sun


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cravingzot; gitmo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last
This article is from an Australian newspaper.
1 posted on 05/26/2003 12:16:13 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Kill em. Kill em all.
2 posted on 05/26/2003 12:22:10 AM PDT by zarf (Republicans for Sharpton 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Death camp would be ideal for the scum who wrote this hit piece.
3 posted on 05/26/2003 12:22:13 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
"The administration has no interest in long-term prison sentences for people it regards as hard-core terrorists."

And the problem with this is??? Humanity has no interest in keeping "hard core terrorists" incarcerated for long terms. It's all just a lot more simple in every respect to make them martyrs - exactly as they originally desired. We're providing a service to them.

4 posted on 05/26/2003 12:23:55 AM PDT by 11B3 (We live in "interesting times". Indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
The plans were revealed by Major-General Geoffrey Miller, who is in charge of 680 suspects ...

Is this from a press conference? Is it being discussed in America?

5 posted on 05/26/2003 12:23:56 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Cant this be pulled???
6 posted on 05/26/2003 12:24:28 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Could be. But it is a discussion piece.
7 posted on 05/26/2003 12:25:32 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Why pull it?
8 posted on 05/26/2003 12:26:28 AM PDT by 11B3 (We live in "interesting times". Indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
The British newspapers are trash and most of what they print are lies.
9 posted on 05/26/2003 12:30:47 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Calling for censorship?
Not in America!
10 posted on 05/26/2003 12:33:01 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Very sorry.
11 posted on 05/26/2003 12:35:08 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
They should be tried under Islamic law.

Then put to death in accordance with that law.

12 posted on 05/26/2003 12:35:39 AM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
That particular newspaper is Australian, although they are quoting British sources. Herald Sun is widely read - a tabloid - will reach a lot of people in Australia.
13 posted on 05/26/2003 12:37:41 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
And here's just the machine for these "Death Camps"!

It's a huge tub grinder, appropriately named "HOGZILLA".

14 posted on 05/26/2003 12:39:14 AM PDT by 11B3 (We live in "interesting times". Indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
No that would be crule and unususal.Cant treat them like they treet our POWs.
15 posted on 05/26/2003 12:40:46 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Let the anti-Teliban Afghanis and anti-Saddam Iraqis deal with them. Ship them all over this week and lets move on.
16 posted on 05/26/2003 12:41:35 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Cruel and unusual?

What planet are you on?

Islamic law would dictate the penalty for the crimes these people have committed. Tried in a court using the very law they proclaim to be following would be pure justice.

17 posted on 05/26/2003 12:44:15 AM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Should have put a sarcasim thing up there huh.Read up.
18 posted on 05/26/2003 12:47:21 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
This is really upsetting:

I bet the gubmint will ignore the gender and minority guidelines when hiring contractors to build this thing 'cuz they're outside the jurisdiction of the US civil courts.

Pisses me right off. /sarc

19 posted on 05/26/2003 12:50:21 AM PDT by dasboot (Everything that should be up, is up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
"It's a huge tub grinder, appropriately named "HOGZILLA"

That expensive machine would be a waste of taxpayers money. They should take an example from the San Diego chicken farmers using a chipper for disposal of their unwanted chickens as a reasonable solution to a "death chamber". They wouldn't even have to buy one, just go to the local rental yard and rent one for a couple of days.
20 posted on 05/26/2003 12:59:51 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
If it was up to me any captive that is not in a uniform should be shot in any war.Dont go to war if you dont have a uniform.Even in our revolution our troops were wearing colors that said who we are.
21 posted on 05/26/2003 1:03:15 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
the move is seen as logical by the US, which has been attacked worldwide for breaching the Geneva Convention on prisoners of war since it established the camp at a naval base to hold alleged terrorists from Afghanistan.
The Geneva Convention is crafted to give nations at war incentives to limit the barbarity of their behavior. The US has used the rhetoric of "war" internally, but in fact al Qaeda is the very parody of the nation at war subject to sanctions and protections of the Geneva Convention. There is no such thing as an al Qaeda symbol or armband, let alone a uniform; al Qaeda does not even claim an address, so far as I know.

So the notion that al Qaeda operatives deserve consideration and sanction against a country which summarily punishes them, is itself an attack on the Geneva Convention.

We are of course quite accustomed to facing enemies who are contemptuous of the Geneva Convention; Germany and Japan had extremely limited adherence to it and the behaviors of North Korea and North Vietnam were similar. And the former regime in Iraq reportedly used most of mosques, schools, and hospitals in the country as military centers--and misused faux or captured US military uniforms to trick its own soldiers into revealing an intention of surrendering against its orders. And of course who could forget the siting of military installations in residential areas?

Such tactics are violations of the Geneva Convention, specifically designed to increase the brutality of war--and, as often as not, to besmirch the reputation of a nation which systematically plans to meet the Geneva Convention's strictures.

The truth is, of course, that for a nation like Iraq to militarily oppose the US is essentially a violation of the Convention from the ground up, since opposition has no prospect of affecting the result in any sense other than the extent of the destruction and mayhem which the conflict imposed almost exclusively on Iraqis.


22 posted on 05/26/2003 1:10:16 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
What's a tub grinder?
23 posted on 05/26/2003 1:17:30 AM PDT by Atchafalaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Most of the prisoners in Gitmo are from Al-Queda, a criminal organization not representative of a formal government.

The Taliban used a non-descript uniform that was only identified by a blue head dress. Hard to tell military personel from civilian.

Regardless of what the military wore or looked like, criminals are tried under a completely different set of laws according to Islam.

Hanging, stoning, beheading are all appropriate sentences as the religious ramification, no entrance into Paradise, is the goal.

After the executions, the corpse should be wrapped in pigskin and buried.

24 posted on 05/26/2003 1:24:12 AM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: BlackVeil
The plans were revealed by Major-General Geoffrey Miller . . .

Whose plan was revealed? Does it have a name? Who wrote it? From which department did it come? Why not give us some more information on this "plan"?

General Miller said building a death row was one plan. Another was to have a permanent jail. . .

Oh...I get it. A reporter asked a ton of questions and General Miller finally said, "well we could do this or we could do that". That what happened? Seeing as we have no real information about this "plan" somebody or other wrote or maybe did not write, a reasonable person might conclude the reporter is trying to get attention with a incindary headline about a "Death Camp"

The Mail on Sunday reported the move is seen as logical by the US . . .

I'm familiar with the "Talking White House" as in "The White House said today..." do we now have an entire country which talks with one voice? Or more likely, did the writer simply express his own opinion of what he thinks "the US" sees as "logical"?

26 posted on 05/26/2003 1:27:23 AM PDT by DPB101 (The first Lawyer elected Speaker of the House of Representatives was arrested for treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Tell me more,I spent 9 months in that stinking cesspool.
27 posted on 05/26/2003 1:27:58 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
The military always has contingency plans, it doesn’t mean that execution will take place – only that if our esteemed politicians deem it necessary the military can implement it.
28 posted on 05/26/2003 1:29:56 AM PDT by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Also was stationed in the state from where you are from.Let me tell you your state sucks.I voluntered for Iceland to get away from Clovis NM and Cannon AFB.
29 posted on 05/26/2003 1:33:58 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Sorry last post was meant for PISTOLSHOT.
30 posted on 05/26/2003 1:38:20 AM PDT by noutopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
These are irregulars and irregulars should be executed.
31 posted on 05/26/2003 1:39:37 AM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Capture the ringleaders and extract info, execute their irregulars on the spot. It won't be over until every al-qaeda is dead.
32 posted on 05/26/2003 1:44:43 AM PDT by frosty snowman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
I have a pretty good notion we're not hearing all the story here.
33 posted on 05/26/2003 2:52:49 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noutopia
Even in our revolution our troops were wearing colors that said who we are.

True only of the regular troops on both sides.

In the South Carolina back country the war was fought mostly by Tory and Patriot irregulars, neither of whom wore uniforms.

In a few battles this lack of uniforms worked to Patriot advantage as they were able to infiltrate Tory lines and use surprise to win victory.

Partisans and Redcoats: The Southern Conflict That Turned the Tide of the American Revolution by Walter Edgar

34 posted on 05/26/2003 2:53:34 AM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I should say so! Is this a current story in the US? Is anyone talking about it?
35 posted on 05/26/2003 2:56:59 AM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Yeah, really, who in America spells their name Geoffrey?
36 posted on 05/26/2003 3:03:43 AM PDT by FoShizzol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
although it might "feel good" executing terrorists is generally a bad idea, when you have a foe who wants to be "martyred" they should be kept alive at all costs,

Terrorists, and bad dudes in general are usually forgoten about in prison, executed terrorists aren't, in a way they live forever.

do you know who Niyow Ayad and Akhman Ajjaj are? (no Google, that is cheating)

Do you know who Timothy McVeigh is?

Has anyone ever asked themselves the question why Israel doesn't execute imprisoned terrorists?

37 posted on 05/26/2003 3:14:46 AM PDT by ContentiousObjector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort

38 posted on 05/26/2003 3:54:06 AM PDT by ALS ("We are the president." Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
"The administration has no interest in long-term prison sentences for people it regards as hard-core terrorists."

Neither does the American public.

These animals are learning the hard way.........................they f**ked with the wrong country at the wrong time, and they are learning that we when we finally fight back, may God have mercy on your soul, because your a** belongs to us.

39 posted on 05/26/2003 4:06:33 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atchafalaya
"what is a tub grinder?"

Never seen one but it looks one could cook up a helluva pot of Gumbo in it!

40 posted on 05/26/2003 4:08:26 AM PDT by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
This article is from an Australian newspaper......


'ang 'em 'igh!
41 posted on 05/26/2003 4:10:07 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
This service could be outsourced to Castro.
42 posted on 05/26/2003 5:05:43 AM PDT by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
I should say so! Is this a current story in the US? Is anyone talking about it?

This is the first that I've heard of it. I would find it quite disturbing if this turned out to be true.

43 posted on 05/26/2003 6:19:39 AM PDT by willowpar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
I equate death camps with concentration camps, Nazis and gas chambers...an outrageous term to use.If it was meant to inflame,it worked. I'd like to flog the writer.
44 posted on 05/26/2003 6:20:58 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
Ah, yes. The Americans as Nazis. Or at least the Bush Administration. Reality be d*mned, once some people's minds are made up, everything is argued from that point of view. Facts only get in the way.

But the scourge that was International Socialism, the greatest critics of National Socialism, has been largely in retreat around the world, EXCEPT in Castro's Cuba, in Kim Jong-Il's North Korea, and the People's Republic of China. One might arguably state that International Communism began crumbling when they faced the implacable Islamic militants, a rag-tag army on a mission. Fresh from that victory, the militants thought they could tackle the Great Satan, the United States. And at first, their strategy seemed to be working. But then came 9/11, a series of acts so egregious, so reckless, so disrespectful, that the sleeping giant stirred into action. Advice, freely given to all who will listen. Don't p*ss off the Americans.

The Islamic militants found out they had just stepped into a meat grinder. The Americans were highly selective in their targets, using almost surgical skill in taking out specific human elements. The opposition was so shattered that they simply folded, fleeing for their lives. But one by one, these cringing rodents are being flushed out, by patient applicantion of human intelligence and artful dialogue. Not negotiation, only a simple statement, come out and surrender. Or suffer consequences, which may or may not involve gunfire exchange.

Justice with mercy, or justice without mercy. Either way, the wages are the same.
45 posted on 05/26/2003 6:30:03 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
(A duplicate thread for this article was deleted as I was composing this reply to its poster, "RepublicanRightOrWrong." I could address it to you, though, as well.)

I'd like to flog the writer.

Why, what's upsetting you? That some observers abroad are, once again, merely calling U.S. government hypocrisy by its right name?

That a government devoting prime real estate in the heart of its capital city to a museum decrying a Bergen-Belsen can, nonetheless, put up its own similar facility at Guantanamo Bay? (Note that the article refers to "death camp," not "extermination facility." There's a difference.)

Or is it, I would sincerely hope, that you'd retch as I would at contemplating both of the above?

Or is it, as I fear, applying to neither of the above? Will any effort used to prosecute this conflict or suppress dissent, no matter how much it tramples on individual rights of due process (which are universal, not just American), be cheered by you?

Every empire "needs" some place to slay those it wants removed with impunity, and without strictures of law. This happened with spiritual empires, such as Torquemada's having his way in Spain against all the Moors, then all the Jews, then all the disobedient Catholics, and if some odd "witches" were put through the wringer or the rack, who'd notice? And it's happened with temporal empires of all sorts that want to preserve public opinion at home.

And now it's "our" turn, apparently, to practice such savagery with impunity. And I doubt that you're surprised.

46 posted on 05/26/2003 6:35:03 AM PDT by Greybird ("War is the health of the State." -- Randolph Bourne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Humanity has no interest in keeping "hard core terrorists" incarcerated for long terms.

Assuming that one can trust government's honesty and infallibility in finding if someone is a terrorist. The judicial process with lawyers, juries, appeals, etc has a number of functions, including one to reduce the erors.

47 posted on 05/26/2003 6:35:11 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
May I suggest....


48 posted on 05/26/2003 6:40:51 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
Oh, Please.A specious argument at best!
49 posted on 05/26/2003 6:45:03 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Greybird
That a government devoting prime real estate in the heart of its capital city to a museum decrying a Bergen-Belsen can, nonetheless, put up its own similar facility at Guantanamo Bay?

I must have skipped history class that day when they were telling us about how the Jews had declared Jihad against the Germans and attacked them on a regular basis for 50 years and even highjacked German airliners and crashed them into office buidings in a coordinated attack killing 3000 innocent Germanss at one time.

50 posted on 05/26/2003 6:45:50 AM PDT by putupon (nothing more to read here, move along)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson