Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate
RichardPoe.com ^ | May 26, 2003 | Richard Poe

Posted on 05/26/2003 9:43:13 AM PDT by Richard Poe

CHINA WILL LIKELY replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Most Americans have heard of the so-called "Chinagate " scandal. Few understand its deadly import, however. Web sites such as "Chinagate for Dummies" and its companion "More Chinagate for Dummies" offer some assistance. Unfortunately, with a combined total of nearly 8,000 words, these two sites – like so many others of the genre – offer more detail than most of us "dummies" can absorb.

For that reason, in the 600 words left in this column, I will try to craft my own "Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate," dedicated to all those busy folks like you and me whose attention span tends to peter out after about 750 words. Here goes.

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented no threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. They could barely reach Taiwan and would likely miss their targets once they got there.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.

China probably has suitcase nukes as well. These enable China to strike by proxy – equipping nuclear-armed terrorists to do their dirty work, while the Chinese play innocent. Some intelligence sources claim that China maintains secret stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons on U.S. soil, for just such contingencies.

In 1997, Clinton allowed China to take over the Panama Canal. The Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa leased the ports of Cristobal and Balboa, on the east and west openings of the canal respectively, thus controlling access both ways. A public outcry stopped Clinton in 1998 from leasing California’s Long Beach Naval Yard to the Chinese firm COSCO. Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

How did China catch up so fast? Easy. We sold them all the technology they needed – or handed it over for free. Neither neglect nor carelessness are to blame. Bill Clinton did it on purpose.

As a globalist, Clinton promotes "multipolarity"– the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others.

To this end, Clinton appointed anti-nuclear activist Hazel O’Leary to head the Department of Energy. O’Leary set to work "leveling the playing field," as she put it, by giving away our nuclear secrets. She declassified 11 million pages of data on U.S. nuclear weapons and loosened up security at weapons labs.

Federal investigators later concluded that China made off with the "crown jewels" of our nuclear weapons research under Clinton’s open-door policy – probably including design specifications for suitcase nukes.

Meanwhile, Clinton and his corporate cronies raked in millions.

In his book The China Threat, Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz describes how the system worked. Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs. Janet Reno and other counterintelligence officials stood down while Lockheed Martin, Hughes Electronics, Loral Space & Communications and other U.S. companies helped China modernize its nuclear strike force.

"We like your president. We want to see him reelected," former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung.

Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

Clinton recieved funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others.

Commerce Secretary Ron Brown served as Clinton’s front man in many Chinagate deals. When investigators began probing Brown’s Lippo Group and Chinagate connections, Brown died suddenly in a suspicious April 1996 plane crash.

Needless to say, China does not share Clinton’s enthusiasm for globalism or multipolarity. The Chinese look out for Number One.

"War [with the United States] is inevitable; we cannot avoid it," said Chinese Defense Minister General Chi Haotian in 2000. "The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war."

Bill Clinton has given them a good start.

_________________________________
Richard Poe is a New York Times bestselling author and cyberjournalist. His book The Seven Myths of Gun Control is due out in paperback in August 2003. Poe’s forthcoming book, The New Underground: How Conservatives Conquered the Internet will be available soon.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1996; bahamas; billclinton; billclintontantrum; billgertz; ccp; charlietrie; chihaotian; china; chinagate; clinton; clintonlegacy; hazeloleary; hillary; jamesriady; janetreno; jishengde; johnhuang; johnnychung; lippogroup; longbeach; mariahsia; mochtarriady; moctarriady; panama; richardpoe; ronbrown; tedsioeng; treason; vancouver; wangjun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Alamo-Girl
"Welcome to Free Republic..."

Thank you very much.
bttt

41 posted on 06/18/2004 5:18:50 PM PDT by StellarOne (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/917940/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: StellarOne

bump to read later


42 posted on 06/18/2004 5:43:58 PM PDT by Betteboop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Betteboop

bttt


43 posted on 06/26/2004 12:13:47 PM PDT by StellarOne (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/917940/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Bump it up!


44 posted on 02/22/2005 9:28:00 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Got Rope?

BTTT

45 posted on 09/26/2006 11:03:59 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Got Rope?

BTTT

46 posted on 09/26/2006 11:04:06 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

This story has got exactly ZERO coverage up here in the news media. Shocking?


47 posted on 09/26/2006 11:17:02 AM PDT by Catholic Canadian (Formerly Ashamed Canadian - thank you Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catholic Canadian
It didn't get much (if any) coverage down here either.

...a story that dwarfs Watergate in significance by a country mile.

48 posted on 09/26/2006 11:19:23 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

For it to get coverage would mean the leftist media would have to sell out one of their own. Can there be any more proof that the MSM has a leftist agenda? This is absolutely shocking.


49 posted on 09/26/2006 12:47:21 PM PDT by Catholic Canadian (Formerly Ashamed Canadian - thank you Stephen Harper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

An excellent summary, including links to more detailed notes.

Nicely done.

As I would like to circulate this summary, I have a question. Could Hazel O’Leary declassify documents? I thought that was something that only the POTUS can do (or by his designated proxy).


50 posted on 09/26/2006 12:56:48 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Ho hoooooo! Now here's a keeper. Bookmarked.


51 posted on 09/26/2006 1:42:07 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This is the issue that got me to join FR. This is why I will forever hate the Clinton Presidency and despise anyone who defends him. I don't think history can recount any act of treason that comes as close as this. The potential of all of this is the deaths of many 100s of millions of people. Many hundreds.


52 posted on 09/26/2006 1:54:39 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
re-bump and correction:

"I don't think history can recount any act of treason that comes close to being as heinous as this."

53 posted on 09/26/2006 1:57:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Visualize dead terrorists! (don't let the libs tell you it's against the Geneva Convention))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Wasn't it something like 200 witnesses who were miraculously "unavailable" for the investigation?


54 posted on 09/26/2006 2:21:54 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

Is there any evidence of Chinese nuclear missiles or other military forces being based in Panama, Vancouver, or the Bahamas?

55 posted on 09/26/2006 2:23:22 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Man, we've time-warped right back into the 90s all over again...

Bookmarked this one.

56 posted on 09/26/2006 6:29:35 PM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS) Gun owners have illustrated rights are individual and can be protected by individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Is there any evidence of Chinese nuclear missiles or other military forces being based in Panama, Vancouver, or the Bahamas?

With the technology Sick Willy gave them they can do it from mainland China.

57 posted on 09/28/2006 12:59:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (I am a kind and lovely person. I am compassionate to mice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
With the technology Sick Willy gave them they can do it from mainland China.

That's true enough, but Poe also alleged that the Chinese have missiles based in Panama, Vancouver, and the Bahamas.

58 posted on 09/28/2006 2:48:48 PM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

bump!


59 posted on 03/03/2007 10:11:33 PM PST by Sun (Vote for Duncan Hunter in the primaries. See you there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bttt


60 posted on 12/17/2012 2:51:19 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson