Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blzbba
There are - what - 2 states that allow homo marriages?

For now. It's coming up in practically every state in the union. Lots of other states and municipalities already allow "same-sex partner benefits." That is, taking your forcefully collected tax money and pouring it down the rat-hole of health benefits for some guy's butt-buddy-of-the-month. And this is just the tip of the iceburg of what's coming.

Yet every state and the Fed. collects income tax...forcefully, if necessary, and the people who enacted these laws initially weren't a bunch of homosexuals.

I agree. But you've got to understand that the homo-promo types who can broach no criticism and who are willing to create laws that will have people arrested for criticizing their "deathstyle" (see Sweden and Canada for starters) are part and parcel of the corrupt government you decry.

Scumbag elected officials who pander to whatever PAC fills their pocketbooks are a FAR greater threat to me personally than any flaming homo.

That's only because you're looking at the surface issue. The homos are attempting to radically change 2000+ years of Judeo-Christian civilization and get us to accept things that were considered anathema a mere 40 years ago. They are not doing it by legislative vote but by judicial fiat for the most part. When the issue is put to a direct vote, even in California, they lose. If you don't see this trend as tyrannical, I can't help you.
41 posted on 05/27/2003 8:06:48 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Antoninus
"That is, taking your forcefully collected tax money and pouring it down the rat-hole of health benefits for some guy's butt-buddy-of-the-month. And this is just the tip of the iceburg of what's coming."


Yeah, I agree that "same-sex" benefits are a freakin' PC joke, esp. since homos change partners as much as slutty heteros....yet, the unmarried slutty heteros aren't getting their lifestyle subsidized...



" But you've got to understand that the homo-promo types who can broach no criticism and who are willing to create laws that will have people arrested for criticizing their "deathstyle"

Very true- these folks' skin is paper-thin when it comes to criticism. This tactic is also used in racial discussions, but I'm sure you've noticed that. This "If you disagree with me, you're a homophobe/racist/anti-Semite" crap prevents me from taking any of their sides very seriously. I get the same reaction when I discuss Israel/Palestine with people.



"When the issue is put to a direct vote, even in California, they lose. If you don't see this trend as tyrannical, I can't help you. "

They also had a vote in Colorado a few years back about same-sex issues....something to do with forceful employment or benefits or something...anyways, the measure was shot down and yep- you guessed it - the homos complained. The real problem with all this is that we're letting a minority group act as though it was the majority.


I guess I don't consider it a huge problem (yet) because I see so many other issues of morality and ethics that are directly impacting me. Enron, Global Crossings, and WorldCom's misdealings cost me FAR more money that these assclown buttpirates have. Thanks for the conversation!
47 posted on 05/28/2003 6:26:39 AM PDT by Blzbba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson